This isnt a case of assault. It was consenting children playing in an inappropriate way. Both children are "at fault" if you are choosing to view it that way, no one has any higher ground to blame the other. One child harming another is a very different scenario than OP describes. Dont be so dramatic. These are kids who engage in this sort of behavior regularly and it's fine, it just wasn't fine at school in that moment in that environment. The consequence should teach that lesson. Neither of these kids are criminals. |
And they had warned about it before and the parent is questioning the punishment - sounds like a bunch of predictably terrible behaved entitled kids |
Umm, actually the way the law works is that you ARE consulted. Charges means both sides plead their case. The verdict is an agreement. |
| Its interesting how many people use the word "punishment" instead of "consequence". Children learn through consequences. They learn best when those consequences are natural. Very little learning happens from punishment, especially when those punishments involve shame. Punishments are effective at enforcing control and making people feel powerful in a powerless situation though. |
That’s not the way the law works and you don’t understand English. You aren’t there at your pleasure, that’s what the handcuffs are about. You beg and plead for a verdict to your liking but any agreement on it doesn’t necessarily include the defendant. Verdicts are imposed. |
Both of these kids have the potential to be if no one teaches them to control themselves in a way that sticks— with meaningful consequences. Body slamming and hitting isn’t “fine” in almost any case and is never fine at school. The sooner they learn that the safer they — and everyone around them— are. And if one of the kids is hurt his parents won’t care if he “consented” before pressing charges. |