Oscars red carpet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.

Ugly dress.

I like the dress. Not crazy about the aesthetic enhancements to her face.

Old lady loose skin thin arms...needs longer sleeves.

This is not "old lady loose skin thin arms." I'd kill for this definition.

These are better ángeles for her than the first photo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Demi Moore as well but amazing dress. I don't know how to post pictures from a tablet. It was a black sparkly sheath with feathers for the top.

This is gorgeous, I especially love the green and the earrings with the dress, but did the feathers on top have to be that long?

Yes they did, if she has old lady boobies under there I don’t want to know

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Demi Moore as well but amazing dress. I don't know how to post pictures from a tablet. It was a black sparkly sheath with feathers for the top.

This is gorgeous, I especially love the green and the earrings with the dress, but did the feathers on top have to be that long?

Yes they did, if she has old lady boobies under there I don’t want to know

Demi Moore of all people does not have old lady boobies.

[Anonymous]

I don’t really care about dresses or bodies but I thought best actor was not the right choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really care about dresses or bodies but I thought best actor was not the right choice.

Who do you think should have won? MBJ was really good and I think the voters recognize that playing two separate characters is especially difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really care about dresses or bodies but I thought best actor was not the right choice.

Who do you think should have won? MBJ was really good and I think the voters recognize that playing two separate characters is especially difficult.

People keep saying this, but imo, Lindsay Lohan did a far better job playing twins than MBJ.

[Anonymous]

Best Actor should have gone to Ethan Hawke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really care about dresses or bodies but I thought best actor was not the right choice.

Who do you think should have won? MBJ was really good and I think the voters recognize that playing two separate characters is especially difficult.

People keep saying this, but imo, Lindsay Lohan did a far better job playing twins than MBJ.

This was a funny joke on sm but if you are saying it seriously you are completely nuts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conan isn’t doing a great job; and the presenter banter is awful.

Yes I am really disappointed in his hosting and the crude sledgehammer banter (such as Sigourney Weaver referring to Kate Hudson as. B^^^ch in the odd segment with Baby Yoda and Conan’s update on Casablanca)

Conan is usually brilliant - he seems so stiff and uncomfortable tonight …

Both of those were funny.

If you like sledge hammer humor …

The b—- line works better if you remember it’s a line from Aliens.

I thought Casablanca scene was pretty good but like an SNL skit probably could have been trimmed.

Think pretty much everything the presenters say is scripted for them so not sure you can blame Kidman for the banter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really care about dresses or bodies but I thought best actor was not the right choice.

Who do you think should have won? MBJ was really good and I think the voters recognize that playing two separate characters is especially difficult.

People keep saying this, but imo, Lindsay Lohan did a far better job playing twins than MBJ.

This was a funny joke on sm but if you are saying it seriously you are completely nuts

I’m not on sm, so yes, this is my real opinion, and I don’t think it’s nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.

Ugly dress.

I like the dress. Not crazy about the aesthetic enhancements to her face.

Old lady loose skin thin arms...needs longer sleeves.

This is not "old lady loose skin thin arms." I'd kill for this definition.

Great arms but looks too thin. Is this a wig?

100% it's a wig.

I kind of hate to be a hater, but Nicole Kidman seems unhinged. The obsession with being thin and not aging. Ma'am, we know you're 58. Her banter with Ewan McGregor was so cringey and he was clearly not into it at all. She seems unable to process that she's no longer 30 and simply doesn't know how to mature. It's really bizarre.

Yes to all of this. Plus she has a bizarre need to be the coquettuish sexpot in everything. Yes, Nicole you are the sexiest and you totally look 35. There is nothing wrong with wanting to look attractive over 50 but she seems slightly unhinged and possibly narcissistic. It did not help when she was hauling Keith Urban around and posing like he is her 20 year old son. But now that Keith got sick of her and left she's doubling down on the need to be the sexiest woman in Hollywood.Weird sh-t.

[Anonymous]

Wait! Nicole Kidman is only 58?! She looks like she’s in her 70s! What has she done to herself?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like Conan but I really think that was a terrible broadcast. I watch this every year but this time it really felt like a job. Almost none of the presenter banter worked, even people who are usually funny weren’t and people who aren’t funny tried to be and failed. The opening bit was great but it was all downhill after that.

The memorial - that was a tough job. Billy Crystal made his part all about the Reiners and Barbra made it all about Barbra. If you’ve been to enough funerals where people get up to speak you know the type. Rachel McAdams did great, and everyone in between were well presented - Knopfler’s Princess Bride music was a great choice - although Robert Duvall probably deserved more. With the biggies that they needed to honor they had to fit a lot of people in but I didn’t love the split screen.

Agreed Rachel's tribute was lovely- you could tell she was fighting tears

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait! Nicole Kidman is only 58?! She looks like she’s in her 70s! What has she done to herself?!

I know, I was shocked when I realized this too. She looks way older than 58. It’s sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.

Ugly dress.

I don't think it's ugly. And it's nice to see her wearing a color that is good for her, for once.

Agree totally, that color is really great for her.