I think Andrea Mitchell's plastic surgery is about the best I've seen

[Anonymous]

Andrea Mitchell is 76.

[Anonymous]

Andrea Mitchell is 64. She looks 64.
Pelosi looks very good mostly because of a wig (I believe she wears a wig)

[Anonymous]

Sorry, correction ... ok for 76 not 64, AM does look good

[Anonymous]

She looks MUCH older than 64. So, by definition (assuming she wants to look young) NOT successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She looks MUCH older than 64. So, by definition (assuming she wants to look young) NOT successful.

this thread is THIRTEEN years old. AM was 64 THIRTEEN years ago.

[Anonymous]

Pelosi looks amazing and always has. And I have no horse in this race, am not even American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are the age we are and I think older women who do not dye their hair, have plastic surgery are beautiful just as they are. Jamie Lee Curtis is beautiful and she accepts her age. If I were a man I would find maturity in a woman a plus.

Ladies, we will never be free until we stop trying to look 18 when we are 40.

No, you wouldn't! Men like youth, like it or not.

Some do. Not the kind of men I tend to like though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's 64 and looks great, but not all tight and pulled and unnatural.

She’s 76 and goes look good.

[Anonymous]

Andrea Mitchell is 76 not 64. I guess she looks 64 with the surgery, huh? She will be 80 in 4 years. Good grief.

That isn't her hair color, which was brown, and now gray, either. So what are we praising? Shouldn't it be her work, and not her surgeon's? She doesn't even look like the same person she was when she started in the industry. Pelosi also.

Ladies, explain why we need to have plastic surgery as we age? At what point can we just accept being our age?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My FIL saw Andrea Mitchell at a wedding about 10 years ago and said she had horrible skin. Guess the camera hides that. I think she looks much older than 64 - surprised to hear she was that young.

She isn't 64. But I am so thanks(!) because now I feel young!

[Anonymous]

How did a 13 year old thread get resurrected?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks great. But I seem to remember her as having dark, poorly styled hair and bad skin The person I'm thinking of was a reporter, that I remember. Anyone know?

Yes,
She did. I remember working as a reporter in Philadelphia and seeing her many years later looking so different and great. She was always a no nonsense, top reporter and well respected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's hard to evaluate surgery with one's conception of natural. This is exactly why these women are getting surgery, so they don't look natural. But Andrea Mitchell's face is attractive and when she talks, all her facial parts move. It helps that she has great hair.

You do realize she wears wigs on screen? Her bio hair is nice but not at all that nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andrea Mitchell is 64. She looks 64.
Pelosi looks very good mostly because of a wig (I believe she wears a wig)

You are correct. Wigs are amazing as you age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did a 13 year old thread get resurrected?

Even worse. How do so many people not look at the posting date when they quote a post. 🤦‍♀️