What is your take on the Angelina Jolie/Brad Pitt divorce saga? What happened on the plane?

[Anonymous]

She seems mentally disturbed and hasn't he acknowledged a drinking problem?

Took two for this tango.

[Anonymous]

Gosh, time flies. So strange to Zahara as a young adult. She's lovely. Hope she's okay with the video being put out there. Shame about her relationship with her dad. As a PP said, who really knows whether or not he deserves it.

[Anonymous]

Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

She wasn't liquid. A large chunk of her fortune was invested in the French estate. She needed that back to live independently and he did everything he could to block it. She clearly had no problem finding a buyer when he refused to come to reasonable terms. Pretty dumb of him. What did he think she was going to do? Sit back without her money indefinitely? He paid for security and loaned her money toward her new mansion, a loan that was probably intended to be considered part of the eventual divorce settlement. But that settlement still hasn't happened, and apparently he didn't pay actual child support for some reason. That was one of her legal actions. She may be rich enough, but she always gave generously to charity and he's far richer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

She wasn't liquid. A large chunk of her fortune was invested in the French estate. She needed that back to live independently and he did everything he could to block it. She clearly had no problem finding a buyer when he refused to come to reasonable terms. Pretty dumb of him. What did he think she was going to do? Sit back without her money indefinitely? He paid for security and loaned her money toward her new mansion, a loan that was probably intended to be considered part of the eventual divorce settlement. But that settlement still hasn't happened, and apparently he didn't pay actual child support for some reason. That was one of her legal actions. She may be rich enough, but she always gave generously to charity and he's far richer.

I'm flabbergasted as to why this has dragged on in such a painful manner. I don't get why he didn't make a generous financial settlement, quickly, and, though I could see it taking some time and therapy, I don't get why she wouldn't give him reasonable access to the kids at some point. The courts haven't forced either of their hands for whatever reason, so on it goes...

[Anonymous]

Thanks Angie and the PR team for refreshing this thread.
Still not convinced that the mother dearest is not abusive in her own way. Time will tell.

[Anonymous]

He seems to take no responsibility for his life choices. If he wanted sweet, God-fearing milquetoast kids like his nieces and nephews, he should have married a partner who wanted the same things. He married an infamous wild child who wanted the kids to experience the world from a young age and be more artistic and less conventional. She didn't misrepresent herself, and he was all in at first. Having always done more than his fair share of pot and booze, his problems became worse and escalated to addiction and abuse.

He didn't represent himself either. It's actually shocking that a former addict would get into a relationship with someone who drinks and smokes weed on daily basis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He seems to take no responsibility for his life choices. If he wanted sweet, God-fearing milquetoast kids like his nieces and nephews, he should have married a partner who wanted the same things. He married an infamous wild child who wanted the kids to experience the world from a young age and be more artistic and less conventional. She didn't misrepresent herself, and he was all in at first. Having always done more than his fair share of pot and booze, his problems became worse and escalated to addiction and abuse.

He didn't represent himself either. It's actually shocking that a former addict would get into a relationship with someone who drinks and smokes weed on daily basis.

They got together because of pure lust. It was not a rational choice for either one. Plenty of red flags on both sides.

[Anonymous]

Pretty sure Brad is the only one to appear in pubic with a black eye…and that was when the relationship was in good terms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

She wasn't liquid. A large chunk of her fortune was invested in the French estate. She needed that back to live independently and he did everything he could to block it. She clearly had no problem finding a buyer when he refused to come to reasonable terms. Pretty dumb of him. What did he think she was going to do? Sit back without her money indefinitely? He paid for security and loaned her money toward her new mansion, a loan that was probably intended to be considered part of the eventual divorce settlement. But that settlement still hasn't happened, and apparently he didn't pay actual child support for some reason. That was one of her legal actions. She may be rich enough, but she always gave generously to charity and he's far richer.

I'm flabbergasted as to why this has dragged on in such a painful manner. I don't get why he didn't make a generous financial settlement, quickly, and, though I could see it taking some time and therapy, I don't get why she wouldn't give him reasonable access to the kids at some point. The courts haven't forced either of their hands for whatever reason, so on it goes...

She’s dragging it out until all kids are 18.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

She wasn't liquid. A large chunk of her fortune was invested in the French estate. She needed that back to live independently and he did everything he could to block it. She clearly had no problem finding a buyer when he refused to come to reasonable terms. Pretty dumb of him. What did he think she was going to do? Sit back without her money indefinitely? He paid for security and loaned her money toward her new mansion, a loan that was probably intended to be considered part of the eventual divorce settlement. But that settlement still hasn't happened, and apparently he didn't pay actual child support for some reason. That was one of her legal actions. She may be rich enough, but she always gave generously to charity and he's far richer.

I'm flabbergasted as to why this has dragged on in such a painful manner. I don't get why he didn't make a generous financial settlement, quickly, and, though I could see it taking some time and therapy, I don't get why she wouldn't give him reasonable access to the kids at some point. The courts haven't forced either of their hands for whatever reason, so on it goes...

They were only married for two years, he doesn’t owe her anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI report claims SHE attacked him first. The kids either joined in or tried to separate them. I think that might be when, if at all, one of the kids got hurt.

She’s also been warned by the judge regarding parent alienation.

The Pitt’s family goes to Santa Barbara to celebrate family events. The Jolie-Pitt kids have attended. The nieces even took them back to Jolie’s house and Jolie served them lunch. This was on the nieces IG accounts.

So he does see his kids, he just doesn’t parade them around for pap walks.

You're reading sketchy sites, with no evidence. First, you need to reread the report. SHE attacked him, are you for real? He shook her, hitting her head against the wall, screaming at her and pouring beer all over her, then went after one of the kids that tried to protect her. She jumped on his back to prevent him from hurting the child. The judge you're citing was disqualified by the Supreme Court of California for being in Pitt's pocket in terms of business interests. The kids have been sighted all over LA, out and about, but never once with him. We now know his eldest daughter has dropped his surname. Sometimes women are the absolute worst in defending corrupt abusers.

That’s her story, much of the report was redacted.

Hollywood loves Brad and hate Jolie. Why? Because they know both of them and what kind of people they are behind the scene.

And if you follow the nieces, the kids have been at his family gatherings so he is seeing them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He seems to take no responsibility for his life choices. If he wanted sweet, God-fearing milquetoast kids like his nieces and nephews, he should have married a partner who wanted the same things. He married an infamous wild child who wanted the kids to experience the world from a young age and be more artistic and less conventional. She didn't misrepresent herself, and he was all in at first. Having always done more than his fair share of pot and booze, his problems became worse and escalated to addiction and abuse.

He didn't represent himself either. It's actually shocking that a former addict would get into a relationship with someone who drinks and smokes weed on daily basis.

There are a lot of blinds pointing to this "former" status as maybe not all that accurate. I also would not be surprised at all if weed and alcohol didn't "count." She's sober from hard drugs like heroin, but not necessarily everything else. I'd actually be shocked if she were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both Jolie and Pitt are crazy wealthy. How could Pitt punish her financially?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a44724692/angelina-jolie-net-worth/

She wasn't liquid. A large chunk of her fortune was invested in the French estate. She needed that back to live independently and he did everything he could to block it. She clearly had no problem finding a buyer when he refused to come to reasonable terms. Pretty dumb of him. What did he think she was going to do? Sit back without her money indefinitely? He paid for security and loaned her money toward her new mansion, a loan that was probably intended to be considered part of the eventual divorce settlement. But that settlement still hasn't happened, and apparently he didn't pay actual child support for some reason. That was one of her legal actions. She may be rich enough, but she always gave generously to charity and he's far richer.

I'm flabbergasted as to why this has dragged on in such a painful manner. I don't get why he didn't make a generous financial settlement, quickly, and, though I could see it taking some time and therapy, I don't get why she wouldn't give him reasonable access to the kids at some point. The courts haven't forced either of their hands for whatever reason, so on it goes...

Because she is vindictive and grudge bearing. Look at her relationship with her dad, her brother, her non-existent friends, every woman whose fiancé or husband she stole, etc etc etc all the charity stuff came late and appeared like damage control

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He seems to take no responsibility for his life choices. If he wanted sweet, God-fearing milquetoast kids like his nieces and nephews, he should have married a partner who wanted the same things. He married an infamous wild child who wanted the kids to experience the world from a young age and be more artistic and less conventional. She didn't misrepresent herself, and he was all in at first. Having always done more than his fair share of pot and booze, his problems became worse and escalated to addiction and abuse.

He didn't represent himself either. It's actually shocking that a former addict would get into a relationship with someone who drinks and smokes weed on daily basis.

There are a lot of blinds pointing to this "former" status as maybe not all that accurate. I also would not be surprised at all if weed and alcohol didn't "count." She's sober from hard drugs like heroin, but not necessarily everything else. I'd actually be shocked if she were.

PP and I agree with you.