Trump can’t pay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Also for the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

Because violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be the argument. You're pretty clueless at this, aren't you?


Eighth Amendment

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

You’re pretty clueless. SCOTUS decided long ago that the 8th amendment doesn’t restrict civil damages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

Because violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be the argument. You're pretty clueless at this, aren't you?


Eighth Amendment

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

You’re pretty clueless. SCOTUS decided long ago that the 8th amendment doesn’t restrict civil damages.

Trump's three appointed shills together with Alito. Thomas and Roberts will overturn this decision BUT ONLY for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed."

Gym? Is that you? Now I see why you never passed the bar in any state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL I thought this was satire until I realized who it was and it's not.

First of all isn't Trump a multi-billionaire?

Second of all, how about Kushner and his wife? Why isn't family helping out?


Too funny.

Yeah, where’s Javanka? They minted and are minting money off his presidency.

[Anonymous]

Pathetic human and family. Focus on the vote while NY eliminates Trump and company like they did to Epstein and company. RIH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

Because violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be the argument. You're pretty clueless at this, aren't you?


Eighth Amendment

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

It’s not a fine. It’s the profits he received by committing the fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Because they don’t really care about the issue, they are politically motivated to go after DJT. It’s blatant corruption and hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Also for the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts

The politicians in New York don’t care about those victims because none of them are accusing Donald Trump.

What was the justification for allowing this to expire after only one year?

Where did all the “victim advocates” who helped pass this disappear to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

Because violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be the argument. You're pretty clueless at this, aren't you?


Eighth Amendment

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

But this is NOT a fine, per se. It's a long established formula for disgorging illegally obtained monies. Trump also first needs to appeal through the NY appeals court, NY Supreme Court etc. After all, didn't sCrOTUS refuse to hear the case for Trump's immunity earlier, saying Jack Smith had to go through the proper channels first? Trump can't just leapfrog this case, that would truly show the system is rigged

[Anonymous]

I am wondering if the enforcement of the fraud judgment would affect the Carroll bond? Are some of the assets to secure the first bond up for seizure for the fraud?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL I thought this was satire until I realized who it was and it's not.

First of all isn't Trump a multi-billionaire?

Second of all, how about Kushner and his wife? Why isn't family helping out?


Too funny.

Yeah, where’s Javanka? They minted and are minting money off his presidency.

And this is before the $2B haul from Saudi Arabia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Because they don’t really care about the issue, they are politically motivated to go after DJT. It’s blatant corruption and hypocrisy.

So you are good with some people breaking the law and not being held accountable, but not others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

Except that this is correct. Laws were changed to permit prosecution of Trump and then changed back. It’s sickening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Because they don’t really care about the issue, they are politically motivated to go after DJT. It’s blatant corruption and hypocrisy.

So you are good with some people breaking the law and not being held accountable, but not others?

Lots of developers have talked about how common these accounting processes are. I'm still waiting for the NY Ag to go after other NYC property owners.