Trump can’t pay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

It was fraud for the Baltimore DA and it was fraud, monumental fraud, committed by Trump for which a monumental fine is monumentally appropriate. I am looking forward to Ms. James seizing Trump Tower and 40 Wall and I hope both go for pennies on the dollar.

[Anonymous]

Has there been anybody in this jurisdiction that was fined that amount of money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

[Anonymous]

Kind of underscores the fact that he’s overvalued his properties for years, doesn’t it?

What a freaking joke this guy is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

[Anonymous]

LOL I thought this was satire until I realized who it was and it's not.

First of all isn't Trump a multi-billionaire?

Second of all, how about Kushner and his wife? Why isn't family helping out?

Too funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

[Anonymous]

Do you know who could pay this?

Taylor Swift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

I see reddit is leaking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

Nope. See Browning-Ferris v Kelco. 8th amendment doesn’t apply to damages in civil cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

Y'all keep saying there were no damages, but that just isn't true. The integrity of the banking system and how are society operates are predicated on a modicum of reality. When people like Madoff and Trump lie and cheat the system, we all end up paying for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:8th Amendment violation on its face. $454 million in assessed damages for no damages incurred or claimed.

They can argue it. Try.

Let’s see what SCOTUS thinks about it.

Why would sCrOTUS have a say?

Because violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be the argument. You're pretty clueless at this, aren't you?


Eighth Amendment

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."