6:41 again. For academics, a lot of kids will move to private schools in wealthy districts so if you are in public you just aren't around them till you show up at the more competitive music class or sports program |
Nope, see who is winning all the innovation awards in USA right now: https://science-fair.org/2023/11/03/thermo-fisher-scientific-jic-announces-2023-winners/#:~:text=Congratulations%20to%20Adyant%20Bhavsar%2C%2013,version%20of%20a%20triboelectric%20nanogenerator. https://www.invent.org/collegiate-inventors/finalists |
To be smart first you have to have facts pounded in your head at a young age so you understand the basic grammar of each kind of subject and have a solid foundation. Then your creativity will thrive based on what you already knew. In the western world we used to know that until the "education innovators" started ruining everything as early as the 19th century. |
this is a nice counterpoint although I’d prefer to call it “American” instead of WASP since 1st gen kids adapt to it pretty quickly. America’s strength in education definitely lies in its opportunities and flexibility, and the fact that people don’t have to get on a track and stay there from 5 years old. There’s more room to fail and succeed. that said … I think current educational trends in the US to water down education, especially math and writing, are pretty concerning. we can do a lot better. OP’s kid will be fine, but not kids who need more direct instruction and practice. |
This. |
so true about T1 schools. sh*t hits the fan in MS. A lot of the parents waxing romantic about T1 elementary schools also do not send kids to T1 MS. Or they have a plan and the money to send kids to a private HS. |
Those awards are meaningless and political. Call me when an Asian with Tiger parents invents something akin to electricity. So far all I see are asinine spelling bee champions and a bunch of engineers who can parrot what they’ve been taught but have no creativity to actually invent something groundbreaking. Yes, immigrants have more kids in stem, but their stem results are not impressive. You only need one Edison, not a million mediocre engineers who win stupid yearly prizes. I’m not impressed with Asian inventions to date. Paper and gunpowder were a long time ago, people. |
Sorry you got fooled. Most of their parents hooked them up. It's cool, but not innovation. - immigrant's kid now grown up |
Public school is pretty basic. All they care about is if students are “at grade level.” If your student is above grade level, there will be zero efforts to teach them anything new. On paper (which is what matters most to admin) it already appears teachers have done their job with your kid |
Everyone should read this! My kindergartener is praised over and over for "brave spelling" and never gets anything corrected. Some things really do need to be practiced and yes, memorized. Why can't we correct one or two words per assignment or per week for a 6 year old? It's not going to crush a kid's dreams or self worth. This sort of things drives me crazy. |
Woah this is spot on. We're in 2nd grade and this is exactly what we've found. Our class is doing remedial work with LOTS of pull outs. The part that irks me is that while the other kids are getting pulled out, no other learning is happening (because then those pull out kids would miss the new stuff being taught). The kids who are on grade level spend the majority of their day on their laptops. It makes school such a drag for every one, even the pull out kids. And then every time a new student comes in, the remedial stuff starts over. Just last month we got a brand new student who doesn't speak English and doesn't know how to read/write- and this is 2nd grade! Back to square one for everyone else. Why can't they separate classrooms by ability? Wouldn't that be the best learning for everyone? My kids are not geniuses, but they deserve teacher time too. |
I've love a very strict teacher who has high expectations. Instead we get fun and no expectations. |
Idk what magical title 1 schools you all are talking about. But ours isn't magical. The "enrichment" is just having nonstop tutoring for kids to learn English. It's not what I'd call enrichment. Enrichment = supplemental educational activities to me. Being at a title 1 school means they can't ask parents for any money, so there's never any field trips, playground equipment is old and broken because no one donates to the PTA. Advanced academics?? No, they're struggling to get kids to starting grade level by the time the school year ends. Smart kids have to help the other kids. And because of the high needs population, there's a lot of teacher turnover. I think teachers go into teaching dreaming about classrooms full of kids eager to learn. Instead you have 3 different languages being spoken, kids who can't sit, kids who break anything in the classroom and kids who have never held or opened a book before K. |
OP back. I know, I know... I am writing a novel here with these posts, but I can't help it.
All the "you need to move now" and "You're in a bad district" replies are so depressing. We actually just moved here because the old district wasn't good enough. People rave about this district. I see FB and other posts desperately asking if anyone at all is planning to sell so they can move into the district for school. It took us over a year to find the housing situation we are in and are finally getting settled. We paid way over list price and compromised a lot of wants to be able to live here. I did look 20 minutes away at the REALLY ritzy area of Town B (think McLean, Potomac) and felt othered as a minority and saw a lot of bratty, bro behavior. I didn't want DD to grow up to be a brat. So we settled for Town A somewhere like Arlington, Falls Church were there is still a little diversity and I felt she could have a somewhat balanced outlook. It's still wealthy and educated, Benz and Volvo level rich town whereas Town B is very white, very Vineyard Vines and a Benz or Volvo would be for "the poors." I recently drove to the top music school that is located in Town B and is supposed to have the top youth orchestra opportunities and was again disappointed by their low standards. The open house was full of really old kids maybe about to start guitar lessons, or thinking about starting cello. In my mind, a top school starts their kids at ages 3, 4, 5, and maybe 6 at the latest. Age 8 to be "thinking about maybe looking into violin lessons" seems very late for a top school, and I'd have thought they would be encouraged to look at other teachers. The woman I talked to actually encouraged my kid to switch to Suzuki method at this late stage. Anyway, our current town actually has a good number of Asians, maybe 10%? and also Russians who I know push their kids in a similar way. My neighbors are Chinese immigrants and I know for a fact that they do math supplementation and orchestra for their kids. But we are talking maybe 1 or 2 kids in a class who do this. My DD is that one kid and I feel conflicted and disappointed. I think, am I pushing too much? Should she be on an additional rec sport team with classmates instead of taking instrument lessons or other enrichment? But I'm nowhere near max level pushing and I don't consider myself high pressure. So am I not doing enough? I also worry she is wasting her time and potential by being in this school environment of mediocrity. And I worry she has a false sense of how great she is, based on comparing herself to peers and this relaxed environment. All this to say... I don't think we can move. Spouse is happy as is kid, the housing stock is ridiculously low, and I don't even know where we would move to, unless into the city to put in private school (Spouse if firmly against) or to Town B. Which again... low housing stock and the rich white entitlement problem. |
^ Typo
Town is actually 15% Asian |