Why are kids with extreme behavior issues being mainstreamed?

[Anonymous]

Addressing pp who thinks kids with special needs should return to the closets they came from:

There are schools in violent neighborhoods, where violence is common. Should they be shut down and remote teaching replace them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

Recommendations please. What is a safe solution that a parent can provide? Remember the solution must be available to all families regardless of their economic circumstances.

No school should have to accept a violent child. Absolutely none. However, publics schools are such a mess that they currently have to.

Parents need to raise their children. In most circumstances, if these kids were properly parented, they would not be violent.

Any parent sending their violent child into an in-person school should accept responsibility for any and all damages.

Safe solutions include virtual school and home school. Shame on any parent who abuses the public school systems.

It's not abusing the public school system. As others have explained again and again, all kids have a right to an education.

If you disagree, then lobby to change the laws. But somehow I doubt you'd be willing to attach your name to your ableist comments.

The laws are wrong. I have no doubt they will change in the next 10 years.

Again, why aren't you willing to publicly lobby to change them? I'm sure you can find a news organization that would *love* to get you on camera making those remarks.

Shame on anyone who wants to keep violent children in public schools.

In other words, you just like to troll internet forums saying things you'd never be willing to say in real life because you know it's highly offensive.

The only thing that is offensive is all the damage you are doing to students and teachers everywhere by tolerating violence.

You should hold a rally. Want me to bring some tagboard over to you so you can make signs?

I don’t need rallies. I spend large sums of money on lobbyists to change the laws.

Might want to look into a different career path; yours seems to be to no avail here.

She's good at trolling, but there's not much money in that. But that's probably the only form of human interaction she has at this point in her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Addressing pp who thinks kids with special needs should return to the closets they came from:

There are schools in violent neighborhoods, where violence is common. Should they be shut down and remote teaching replace them?

Should have been done years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

Recommendations please. What is a safe solution that a parent can provide? Remember the solution must be available to all families regardless of their economic circumstances.

No school should have to accept a violent child. Absolutely none. However, publics schools are such a mess that they currently have to.

Parents need to raise their children. In most circumstances, if these kids were properly parented, they would not be violent.

Any parent sending their violent child into an in-person school should accept responsibility for any and all damages.

Safe solutions include virtual school and home school. Shame on any parent who abuses the public school systems.

It's not abusing the public school system. As others have explained again and again, all kids have a right to an education.

If you disagree, then lobby to change the laws. But somehow I doubt you'd be willing to attach your name to your ableist comments.

The laws are wrong. I have no doubt they will change in the next 10 years.

Again, why aren't you willing to publicly lobby to change them? I'm sure you can find a news organization that would *love* to get you on camera making those remarks.

Shame on anyone who wants to keep violent children in public schools.

In other words, you just like to troll internet forums saying things you'd never be willing to say in real life because you know it's highly offensive.

The only thing that is offensive is all the damage you are doing to students and teachers everywhere by tolerating violence.

You should hold a rally. Want me to bring some tagboard over to you so you can make signs?

I don’t need rallies. I spend large sums of money on lobbyists to change the laws.

Might want to look into a different career path; yours seems to be to no avail here.

She's good at trolling, but there's not much money in that. But that's probably the only form of human interaction she has at this point in her life.

Who is the troll here? The person trying to reduce school violence or the person throwing shade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Addressing pp who thinks kids with special needs should return to the closets they came from:

There are schools in violent neighborhoods, where violence is common. Should they be shut down and remote teaching replace them?

Should have been done years ago.

You are short sighted. Go to an optometrist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Addressing pp who thinks kids with special needs should return to the closets they came from:

There are schools in violent neighborhoods, where violence is common. Should they be shut down and remote teaching replace them?

Should have been done years ago.

You are short sighted. Go to an optometrist.

I see down-range fine. Forced sterilization comes next.

[Anonymous]

Just isolate the fight club kids in a trailer on the outskirts of school property. Safety for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Addressing pp who thinks kids with special needs should return to the closets they came from:

There are schools in violent neighborhoods, where violence is common. Should they be shut down and remote teaching replace them?

The violent kids should be sent home since they aren’t likely to be learning anything anyway. If that cuts the class size in half, even better for those kids who want to learn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

Time for you to go to bed to dream of eugenics and segregation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

Time for you to go to bed to dream of eugenics and segregation.

Stop trolling and consider the safety of innocent students and teachers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

Time for you to go to bed to dream of eugenics and segregation.

Stop trolling and consider the safety of innocent students and teachers.

And the safety of everyone else these kids will interact with as they get older. That means getting schools to provide the necessary supports and services for these kids to develop life skills. Which is the exact opposite of what you've been suggesting.

But it's pretty clear you're not serious. I'm not sure why you continue to post here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

Time for you to go to bed to dream of eugenics and segregation.

Stop trolling and consider the safety of innocent students and teachers.

And the safety of everyone else these kids will interact with as they get older. That means getting schools to provide the necessary supports and services for these kids to develop life skills. Which is the exact opposite of what you've been suggesting.

But it's pretty clear you're not serious. I'm not sure why you continue to post here.

These kids should be in therapy and not an in-person school. The life skills they need are also a prerequisite for in-person school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to start holding the parents responsible. They truly are if anyone is injured or traumatized. The focus needs to be on the parents.

What do you expect the parents to do? The school had custody of the child during this event, not the parents. The parents wouldn't be allowed in the classroom. And they don't don't get to decide supports or placement for the child.

Parents need to raise their kids right. The parents are the guilty ones.

In other words, you don't have even a passing familiarity with neurodivergent individuals. Move along.

That is not an excuse for violence.

And no one said it is. Read the thread.

The thread is about violent children in school and how parents knowingly release these violent children on the public school system.

You realize you are legally required to send kids to school, don't you? And the schools are similarly required to come up with appropriate placements and supports.

The parents are responsible for selecting an appropriate school for their children. Homeschool, virtual school, in-person public, in-person private, etc.

Any parent who just sends their violent disruptive kid into public school knows they are releasing chaos and harm onto all those students.

It is lazy to blame the public schools when we already know they don’t work for these types of kids.

Adults are trying to talk here. Go back to bed.

You sound guilty. Yes, the harm your child does to all the other kids in school is your responsibility as a parent.

Except it's not. You might want it to be, but you'd just be putting parents in even more of an impossible situation when dealing with MCPS.

The parents need to find a safe solution. Public school isn’t the solution.

If the public school isn't able to accommodate a child, then the school is obligated to find and pay for private placement.

That will still be inadequate. Stop looking to make taxpayers burden the costs of your child. Find a safe solution.

DP. Parents are required by law to send their kids to school. Public schools are required by law to provide all kids a Free and Appropriate Public Education. (FAPE). When the school system itself is unable to do this, the child gets a "private placement" in a school that can
provide an appropriate education. When that happens it's not "parents looking to burden taxpayers with the costs of their child". It's actually the school system privatizing its own obligation to provide FAPE because it's cheaper to outsource privately for the smaller number of cases than create the appropriate educational environment in house. It helps the taxpayer pay less overall.

Parents are legally required to send violent children to school and schools are legally required to educate them. The school system can provide FAPE in many different ways. Even violent children have a right to be educated in person - not restricted to online
school. Schools cannot shift the burden of FAPE to a parent and force them to homeschool. or pay for private school. Typical private schools will not accept a violent child. Typical theraputic schools accept many of their kids thru private placement.

Maybe we need to change the law so that violent kids don’t have the right to be educated in person. Violence results in limitations on your participation in society.

Time for you to go to bed to dream of eugenics and segregation.

Stop trolling and consider the safety of innocent students and teachers.

And the safety of everyone else these kids will interact with as they get older. That means getting schools to provide the necessary supports and services for these kids to develop life skills. Which is the exact opposite of what you've been suggesting.

But it's pretty clear you're not serious. I'm not sure why you continue to post here.

These kids should be in therapy and not an in-person school. The life skills they need are also a prerequisite for in-person school.

Wow. So oblivious, yet so willing to share your thoughts. As long as you don't have to attach your name to them, that is.