Anonymous wrote:Kathy,
We appreciate your interest. The INA problems being raised on this board are not about educational opportunities. No one disagrees with the benefits of continuing education for all.
The issue is that the INA is supposed to be a nanny organization, not a self-promoting agency marketing scam.
Actually, I believe the quoted poster is confused about what INA is, and always has been.
http://nanny.org/mission
"INA's mission is to serve as the umbrella association for the in-home child care industry by providing information, education and guidance to the public and to industry professionals."
Anonymous wrote:
The INA is supposed to be the International Nanny Association. If you are not a nanny, why are you sitting on the board of this group? Why are you even a member?
www.nanny.org
Again, this shows confusion about the mission of INA - it is an umbrella organization that welcomes all aspects of the nanny industry - nannies, agencies, educators, special service providers, and even families who employ nannies.
From the Mission Statement linked above:
"The International Nanny Association (INA), a nonprofit organization, serves as the umbrella organization for the in-home child care industry. INA members include nannies, nanny employers, nanny agencies, educators and industry service providers.
Since 1985, INA has worked to professionalize the industry by setting high standards for industry professionals and nanny agencies. INA leverages the expertise of industry professionals from around the globe to help increase awareness about the industry, to develop the professional skills of nannies, and to educate parents about the benefits of hiring a qualified nanny to care for their children."
Perhaps you are confusing INA with the former NAN (National Association of Nannies)? INA has never been a nanny only organization, and it was organized originally by nanny educators and a small handful of placement agencies to try to establish and articulate norms and standards for the industry, and provide educational opportunities for all parties active in the in-home childcare industry. I was welcomed warmly in 1993, and nannies and agencies alike understood the benefits of professional compensation, which included the proper payroll treatment of the nannies/employees.
Anonymous wrote:
How many nannies are on the board of your nanny agency organization?
www.theapna.org
Zero. Why?
You don't even allow nanny or family membership, let alone be on the board. Why?
Please explain your "no nannies or families allowed" policy, in your own association, but demand to control the "nanny" organization?
Why no equal "balance"?
1. Non-nannies should step down from the INA board. Until you do, there is no hope for any real advocacy for nannies and the families they care for. The priority of agency business owners, is their profits. This is a distinct conflict of interest with nannies and families, who strive to provide the best possible childcare. Few, if any, agency owners have any significant training or extensive experience in childhood development, beyond their own families. Many agency owners are smart business people who recognized a lucrative business opportunity. Some are even attorneys and MBA's who capitalized on the naive nature of nannies and parents in disparate need of childcare.
2. Your own exclusive nanny agency club, should open its membership to nannies and families. If you want to maintain your membership and voting privileges in the International Nanny Association, you should extend the same options for nannies and families in APNA.
Also, it would be worthwhile for you to disclose the current breakdown of the INA membership. What are the current numbers for:
1. Nanny Agencies and other businesses
2. Actual Nannies
INA was started originally started by a group of nannies before it got over run by agency business owners, from what I understand. Let it return to being, what its name says:
The International Nanny Association
This is factually wrong. INA was never established by nannies and then over run by agencies. Again, I suggest you might be confusing INA with NAN, which was by nannies, for nannies, and folded in large part because there were not enough nannies willing to step up and volunteer and lead, something every association needs to stay viable.
I am very proud to work side by side on the INA board with nannies, agencies, and newborn care specialists. We respect each other, work together very cooperatively, hear each other's different points of view, and put forth a lot of effort to improve the professionalism of the entire industry.