I think I made it very clear that we are willing to make compromises. I never said in any of my posts the AP just had to "deal." What I said, was that while we are only required to have the car available for meetings and classes, we also plan to have it available for most evenings and weekends but that morning/ early afternoon requires 3 adults to share. Sharing was how it was described to AP, and yes it is sharing, as the entire point of my post is how to schedule that "sharing." The responses I'm getting are that the au pair should not have to share even a tiny bit, that the entire burden of inconvenience falls to us, and that we should buy a car. Which not only adds the cost of the car, but also makes her the primary driver of that car and thus the insurance goes from $400 extra a year to a few thousand. If people participating in the AP program really followed the advice of the AP trolls on this board who seem to think money is no object and the answer is ALWAYS- yes, HF, spend, buy, more, more more etc. then people would just spend $60000 and hire an experienced nanny. Or less and have a live out one. It isn't about sucking out as many hours as possible in our case for the cheapest amount. It is about whether or not the cost is reasonable considering we have other much less expensive options- but prefer to go this route and participate in a cultural exchange. We will hold out for the fact that the program does have appeal even for those of us who don't "need" to hire the cheapest person possible for 45 hours a week. We could definitely spend less money continuing with a local babysitter and summer camp, but are excited about helping this person meet her goals and experience the program. If she shows up and is as entitled and greedy as the the trolls here, it does give me comfort that we spelled it all out in advance and will not be in a position to scramble if AP is not able to share as she has indicated she is or turns out to otherwise be nothing but a pain like many of you here seem to be. From our interviews and informational exchange I believe she is the person she says she is and that she isn't agreeing to our terms but planning to show up and change everything. I will continue to give her the benefit of the doubt until she proves otherwise that she is going to be as problematic and unable to share as the rest of you seem to want to believe. |
I am one of those "actual host families" whose responses you are looking for, and I already replied that while we did this one year while my husband rode his bike to work every single day and yes it was an inconvenience but yes it was a priority so that the au pair could have a car every single day, I strongly urge you to get a third car if you don't want the inconvenience of having to share a car with your husband or pay for uber. It will make you much happier and hermuch happier. We are on our 11th year in the program, and the way we have been so happy with it so long is that we do inconvenience ourselves to make sure that she is happy, just as I am sure she is inconveniencing herself plenty to make sure we are happy. |
If OP wants to think we're all au pair trolls, then good luck to you!
But seriously. Other HFs are tell you "sharing" for nights/weekends is insufficient. There's no magic formula of having a car available during the mornings/afternoons for 2/days a week, while you take both cars for the other 3 workdays, that will keep your au pair happy. Not all au pairs that want a car available to them most of the time are princesses. Many au pairs take advantage of playdates, local parks/libraries, etc. that require car use during working hours (especially in the summer) or doing things like going to the gym for split shift hours. Stop asking here and complaining when you overwhelmingly don't get the kind of response you want... |
If it were possible for my husband or I to ride a bike to work, we would. No matter how much you all are dead set on making us appear to be thinking only our own convenience, the fact still stands that I am looking for an arrangement that is mutually considerate. We could choose to avoid this by only meeting the program requirements of getting her to meetings and classes, but we want to go beyond that and are not only offering a car all weekends and evenings when she will be off, but looking for ways to add additional car time during the week. We are willing to inconvenience ourselves by finding other ways to handle getting to work during the week a portion of the time, but not every single day. If a person can't handle being told there are, for example, 20 hours during the week comprised of 168 hours total, where the car is not available, then they are too selfish and entitled for us. But we screened well for that. I am just looking for a reasonable person who has been in this situation to discuss it with, who does not see purchasing a 3rd car as the only possibly option. While it is great that it was an option for you to purchase a 3rd car, this is not an option for us. We are one time AP HF. we are not planning to cycle through them as our childcare of choice indefinitely. If we were planning this as a lifestyle on a continuing basis then it would surely make sense, but as it is, this does not. |
Not really. Your au pair is not required to stay if she's miserable, and the "minutes" it took you to match would likely have been more if there was no car at all available ever. People are telling you that they tried exactly what you are suggesting, and they, and their au pair, found it to be a long slog of a year far too concerned with who has the car when. And you need to talk to your insurance company anyway. If your au pair is a regular driver, regardless if she is the primary driver, you need to add her to your insurance. |
You need to ask the AP what she would most likely do during her time off during the day from Mon to Fri. If she plans to go out most every day on a regular basis (to the gym, Starbucks, see friends, day classes several times a week etc.) then, you will have a difficult time with 3 people sharing 2 cars during the weekday. If she has a split schedule but all her friends work straight through the day, she won't have friends to go and hang out with anyway. If she doesn't like going to the gym and is more a runner or cyclist who prefers the jogging or biking trails (is there one?) by your house, then she won't need a car. If she is a home body and goes into her room every chance she gets to skype with people back home, then she won't be going out much. Not every AP will desire to go out a lot and need a car with unrestricted access. However, you need to understand your AP's needs and like other PP said, she may have a personality that will be reluctant to tell you what she really wants and her unhappiness just festers until something happens that sets her off and she calls a rematch.
Bottom line is you really won't know until she gets here about what kind of activities she wants to spend her time doing. She probably doesn't have a clue either and whatever she tells you now is only what she imagines anyway. She may imagine a certain kind of life and feels it is okay to not always have access to a car until reality hits and she makes friends with others who have access to a car when she cannot or she finds something she likes to do that she did not know about before but needs a car to get to. If unrestricted access to a car is not feasible, then at least make the car access a regular and dependable schedule so the AP can make plans and not have to check with you every time she wants to take the car out. Having the choice and ability to use or not use a car feeds into a sense of independence and contributes to happiness. |
I agree with OP, some of you are making more of this situation than necessary. Making a car available to the AP at all times so she can shop, go to Starbucks, the gym and hang out with friends is not a priority when 2 working host parents need to prioritize their needs and work schedules. As OP stated, it is not mandatory that a car be provided and she just needs to work out an agreement with AP regarding a reasonable schedule. This situation is best for an AP who does not set a high expectations for use of a car at all times. Being transparent during the search process is key, but suggesting that a family invest in another vehicle just to satisfy an AP is frivolous and unnecessary.
I see it very often that families are providing excessive perks that only create entitled APs. Hence many are having problems with silly tantrums from APs who only want to provide basic care yet expect lavish perks. Having an AP compalin about not have cleaning service for living quarters, fully paid gym memberships, gourmet/expensive grocery items, car access to shop and sip lattes, etc. is a problem that I will never have nor will I engage in that foolishness. Invest your money more wisely in a properly trained nanny as opposed to mindless perks for an au pair. |
Our clunker cost us $2,000. Is inexpensive to insure. Our APs work very hard for us and love our children. So yes PP, it is a priority to me that they can go shop, to Starbucks, the gym or just get in the car and drive.
OP, if you can make it work, that's great. And I sincerely hope it does. Good luck. |
This is the best response you've gotten OP. Listen to it. |
When my children are able to drive, we will all be sharing the family cars and scheduling/organizing who-drives-what-when. I also expect our APs to do the same, especially since they knew prior to matching that we share two cars. Public transportation and car-pooling with friends are always options for resourceful APs. If they can't manage that, then they aren't the right AP for our family. |
Yes I agree but this isn't new .... it is exactly the point of my post. She says she runs, reads, does crafts, etc and does not need to leave house everyday during the morning. This was discussed during the match when I explained the car situation. She says she doesn't need the car at all to be happy. But I think she may change her mind and so am planning for that to happen, as I felt she was being very agreeable but may actually want to know the car would be there for her x number of days. as you said, I feel like a schedule she can count on is best, hence my post about what would be reasonable. I do think we can find out more when she gets here - but I have to start somewhere and think it is important to spell it out in advance as much as possible. I plan to email entire handbook before she gts on plane. That was why I posted, but few people are seeming to understand that I have good intentions. We are not buying a third car that is cheap and unsafe and not able to find the $70/mo pp found on her rental . That's how it goes with anonymous message boards though people live to try to turn anything into drama or some inconsiderate situation that it isn't. |
I am the previous PP. What is "reasonable" is subjective. Ask 10 people and you will get 10 different examples of what a reasonable car sharing schedule could be. Ultimately, it starts with what you can feasible offer to do in this sharing scenario without being resentful that you and your husband are bending over backwards to give this AP car access. You need to figure out your "ideal for you", "compromise that you can live with that will not be too inconvenient" and "the most you can do that will create hardship but for a rockstar AP, it is worth it". Once you know your top and bottom limits, then you can check with the AP on what she really wants (likely have to wait until she gets here since nothing is real until she is living her AP life). Then see how far the gap is between her (what she "wants and would be nice to have" versus "essential to be happy") and your family (your top and bottom limits). Regarding the handbook, I like to send the entire handbook (minus the parts that are not relevant until AP gets here like household appliance instructions) to the AP before match. I want to avoid the AP being "surprised". I err on the side of full disclosure. Of course, some AP will agree to anything to get matched and then complain later. Cannot eliminate that risk but at least, for the AP with good intentions to find the best HF fit, it is better to be an open book before match. I also find that talking about contentious topics like car, vacation, schedule, chores, guests, food etc. on Skype or email in pieces do not yield the same level of comprehension as the AP reading the details word for word in a handbook. Better to send that handbook sooner rather than later. |
My agency said to present it within 3 days of arrival, but my plan has been to get it together and send it before she can choose not to get on the plane so things are very spelled out and in writing, beyond just the multiple emails and skype interviews. I totally agree with you that saying and having them agree in the midst of the excitement of finding a family, is not necessarily going to reflect life down the road once they arrive and start wondering what would have happened if they had held out. Maybe life on a beach seemed worth it at the time, but when reality rolls around the AP would rather be in Oklahoma on a farm and able to drive to McDonalds if she wants an egg mcmuffin between 8 and 1 pm every day. This full disclosure and very clear expectation is exactly what I'm looking for. This is why I told her the car is being shared and asked how she felt about having many daytime hours during the week with no car. She said no problem and was very convincing in that it was not a problem for her due to her interest in other hobbies and the fact that she has plenty of other time to get out.... but yet I do not want her to feel trapped in the house and miserable at any time, and feel she would be happier knowing she could count on the car on a certain schedule. She agreed to having NO car during these hours at all, but I feel that is not an option and so wanted to enter a minimum in the handbook. Yes it is a different situation for different people, (as seen on this board there are APs who never leave their room and buying a 3rd car would be a total waste) .... but the angle of my post here was to see if others out there in the situation (which my agency assured me there are many) have a schedule that has worked well and everyone was reasonably satisfied so I could benefit from their experience in this situation. I thought from their personal experience I might glean a good beginning point to enter into the handbook. I have been getting more concrete advice with less snark and general asshat behavior than most of the posts here (not yours, but obviously the suggestion that my husband is going to have sex with the AP because there are 20 hours a week where her use of the car will fluctuate makes one lose a lot of motivation to take any posts here seriously) from the LCC and other host families they put me in touch with. Their advice is to set the maximum restriction on the use of the car and then let her find it is actually available more than anticipated, so I will continue to digest all of the reasonable responses I've received and come up with something for the handbook. |
OP, I really wish you were registered so that I could know who you are when you post in the future. I took the time to reply twice to your post -- in a reasonable manner, based on my experience as a very longtime HM who did share two cars with three adults but who found it such a challenge that I recommended getting a third inexpensive car. You didn't like what I had to say, though, so you labeled my suggestions and a lot of other replies "unreasonable." I would like to spare myself the time and energy of replying to you in the future, so please make sure to note in your posts that you're the "sharing two cars with three adults" poster, so that I can withhold my advice and experience and save them for people who, even though they may not like what I have to say and may not follow my advice, still appreciate that I took the time and energy to respond at all and don't automatically label anyone who disagrees with what you want to do "unreasonable." |
The OP will be rematch no less than twice in a year. Guaranteed |