Shady moms RSS feed

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have it right. We are saying the same thing. Of course, OP is not very articulate so it is difficult to really understand her issue.

My employer posted an ad saying she
is looking for a family to join our group
to do a nanny share. She also said she
had a great nanny who would be caring
for the two families kids.


What is so hard in understanding the above post? You should be the last one on earth talking about anyone not being articulate.


Yes, MB is advertising for a family to join her share. The families responding are inviting OP's MB to join their shares instead. These other families already have nannies they want to keep. Because these other families are as good to their nannies as OP's MB is to her. They want OP's MB to join their share with their awesome nanny. What's wrong with that? These families don't know OP. They know their nannies, who they value highly.


You sound ridiculous these families don't know me or my boss so why try to persuade her to give me the axe? Your comment makes no sense what so ever.


Anonymous
OP, you need to work on your reading comprehension.

No one is trying to persuade anyone to give you the ax. The point of the post you keep replying to (seriously, responding three times to the same post definitely makes you overdramatic) is that there is nothing "shady" or "dirty" about other people wanting to keep their nannies when trying to replace a family in a share--just like it isn't shady or dirty for your MB to want to keep you.

Simple. If you still don't get it, you have a lot to learn in life.
Anonymous
The way the other families are going about it is what is shady. Contacting a family directly that has already stated they have a nanny and aren't looking for a new one. OPs MB is NOT doing the same thing. If you think its the same, you are without scruples and there really isn't any point in continuing to argue with you. OP the normal people understood your post and your offense, but it doesn't matter. Lots of MBs suck, as evidenced here and elsewhere all the time, but yours has your back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OP, you need to work on your reading comprehension.

No one is trying to persuade anyone to give you the ax. The point of the post you keep replying to (seriously, responding three times to the same post definitely makes you overdramatic) is that there is nothing "shady" or "dirty" about other people wanting to keep their nannies when trying to replace a family in a share--just like it isn't shady or dirty for your MB to want to keep you.
Simple. If you still don't get it, you have a lot to learn in life.[/quote

You are so simple minded even if you sat on Mr Rogers lap and he tried to explain it to you slowly including puppets for a full affect you still couldn't comprehend it.
If someone suggests that they should drop their nanny and use theirs what in the heck do you think it implies?This isn't a hear say situation, I see them blatantly asking my boss to ditch me. I can see you just want to argue so argue with yourself!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The way the other families are going about it is what is shady. Contacting a family directly that has already stated they have a nanny and aren't looking for a new one. OPs MB is NOT doing the same thing. If you think its the same, you are without scruples and there really isn't any point in continuing to argue with you. OP the normal people understood your post and your offense, but it doesn't matter. Lots of MBs suck, as evidenced here and elsewhere all the time, but yours has your back.


Thanks even Stevie Wonder can see these moms are shady. I can see this tatic isn't working too well,one offender is in the share post still searching. Just guessing they are desperate for someone to help them with their finances.
Anonymous
Your mb is just as desperate, Op.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Your mb is just as desperate, Op.


There is nothing wrong with being in a care share situation. At least she isn't acting like a mongoose trying to be sneaky.
Anonymous
This thread is hilarious. OP, I'm pretty sure at this point you are just responding to yourself. I wish your MB would see this and drop your unstable ass.
Anonymous
OP, just something to watch out for. If they need to do a share and can't find a family that needs a nanny, these "shady" moms' emails are going to start looking better.

That said, I don't know if shady is the right word I'd use. There is nothing shady about a mom emailing your MB and saying "hey we are looking for a new family for our share. We already have a nanny but if you're interested, let me know". Shady would be badgering your MB convincing her that their nanny is better than you, etc. I think you're overreacting a bit.
Anonymous
This thread is hilarious. OP, I'm pretty sure at this point you are just responding to yourself. I wish your MB would see this and drop your unstable ass.

You probably have an ass like Sponge Bob Square Pants. There is nothing wrong with my post so go somewhere.
Anonymous
OP, just something to watch out for. If they need to do a share and can't find a family that needs a nanny, these "shady" moms' emails are going to start looking better.

No things are looking pretty good, we are trying to decide which family to join our share.
Anonymous
OP, just something to watch out for. If they need to do a share and can't find a family that needs a nanny, these "shady" moms' emails are going to start looking better.

That said, I don't know if shady is the right word I'd use. There is nothing shady about a mom emailing your MB and saying "hey we are looking for a new family for our share. We already have a nanny but if you're interested, let me know". Shady would be badgering your MB convincing her that their nanny is better than you, etc. I think you're overreacting a bit.


to say she is overreacting a bit is totally understating it. op is crazy. all her followups show how crazy she is. i can't imagine why her mb would try to keep her. she is both stupid and mean, as shown clearly here.
post reply Forum Index » General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: