Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page
Well, the school in question, WIS, has been open since the beginning of the year[b]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page
Well, the school in question, WIS, has been open since the beginning of the year
Even assuming that is true, that is very different than the "vast majority of privates have been open."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page
Well, the school in question, WIS, has been open since the beginning of the year
Even assuming that is true, that is very different than the "vast majority of privates have been open."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page
Well, the school in question, WIS, has been open since the beginning of the year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page
Anonymous wrote:Allowing DCPS to stay closed while your own kids enjoy in person learning at a top private is unconscionable. I sent him an email with my concerns. I am open to any additional suggestions of next steps. Recall?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the DC council not call for a hearing on schools? Get these officials in the public record?
That is more important than worrying about any one official.
No, they are oversight and will call hearings on schools, spin their wheels and defer DC to the mayor. That's been ok when the WTU has been counting on them but employment of this person is "Good for thee, not for me." At the highest level, to reiterate, we should be holding our elected officials to meet certain standards. Why can we have a DC residency requirement when a salary threshold is met but not a requirement to enroll your kids in DCPS? I'm sure his residence is in DC because it's a condition of employment, when should it be different when you are the highest paid public education official that you not enroll your kids in the very school district you represent professionally?