Those of you asking for differentiation in ES have unrealistic expectations

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


I completely agree. I think AAP is ridiculous and over utilized. I have a good friend who is an AAP teacher and she put it this way, which I agree with: an AAP/GT program is not for the truly advanced when half of the grade level is in that program. Then it's just to brag that "my kid is advanced." Most are not, and that's in her experience in a highly rated AAP center school. There are so many ways to press your way into AAP, at this point. I know people who've done it.

My kid did not do AAP. DC was not selected for advanced math in ES (but should have been, but I didn't complain). DC is in 8th. All honors 7th and 8th. Straight A's. And our principal says that the kids taking all honors are taking the same curriculum as AAP kids. So DC is successfully doing AAP work.

I have no gripe with my kid not doing AAP in ES as DC didn't want to do it. I didn't care to push hard. DC was succeeding. And now exceeding most of DC's peers. Hopefully that will continue, but who knows?

I believe ES AAP is not necessary based on our experience and my interactions / knowledge with AAP at our ES. It's a waste of resources. It should be eliminated.


So you're basing your assessment on your child's single non-AAP school experience and secondhand knowledge in maybe a handful of conversations?

Completely worthless opinion then.
Anonymous
Back in the 1990's, public schools also used a real curriculum, including textbooks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honest question: why don’t some of the parents of the gifted/advanced kids look into skipping a grade if school is so boring for them? That’s what the truly advanced kids did when I was in school...
My kid is a September birthday and thus very young for her grade. Skipping her a grade would put a 7 yo in with 9 yos. That seems like a bad idea socially--she's smart, not mature. The challenge is that the math being taught this year is remedial at best. So slow. So basic. So boring. No critical thinking required whatsoever. At least 2/3 of the class is bored out of their minds.


They can spend that time working on their numerals. At 7 kids need tons of exercise to get their hand muscles up to speed.

100% of 2nd grade math in virtual school is on the screen. It's typed only this year. Most of class is spent with kids explaining how they figured out the sum of 7+4 or how they determined the hundreds place in 321. Think 15 minutes per problem. Soooooooo slow.


The pace of ES math this year is galatial. My first grader is basically going to spend the entire year learning numerals up to 110 and how to add numbers 0-9 to each other and subtract the same from each other. SO slow.



Yes, public schools are online but you can still provide a paper and pencil to your kid. My tested at 99th% for math. I make him write equations using the numbers they are working on while he is waiting. Like separating 7 into 2 smaller number and then adding those to 4 etc. etc. Or getting as close to 50 or x using those numbers. He can usually do one thing while the class is talking about the 7+4.
pettifogger
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


I completely agree. I think AAP is ridiculous and over utilized. I have a good friend who is an AAP teacher and she put it this way, which I agree with: an AAP/GT program is not for the truly advanced when half of the grade level is in that program. Then it's just to brag that "my kid is advanced." Most are not, and that's in her experience in a highly rated AAP center school. There are so many ways to press your way into AAP, at this point. I know people who've done it.

My kid did not do AAP. DC was not selected for advanced math in ES (but should have been, but I didn't complain). DC is in 8th. All honors 7th and 8th. Straight A's. And our principal says that the kids taking all honors are taking the same curriculum as AAP kids. So DC is successfully doing AAP work.

I have no gripe with my kid not doing AAP in ES as DC didn't want to do it. I didn't care to push hard. DC was succeeding. And now exceeding most of DC's peers. Hopefully that will continue, but who knows?

I believe ES AAP is not necessary based on our experience and my interactions / knowledge with AAP at our ES. It's a waste of resources. It should be eliminated.


Irrespective of AAP or not, I would urge you to consider checking in detail what your child actually knows vs their gaps. Per your bolded statements it seems that you overly trust what school admins are saying. Doing well in middle school classes does not necessarily translate into doing well high school classes, as there are so many kids who get A's in middle school and end up struggling in high school.

There are so many more factors you need to consider; i.e is the teacher appropriately challenging the kids vs giving them easy assignments, is your kid actually working hard and getting A's or just coasting, is the school and teacher known for academic excellence or just average... etc, etc. The only way to find out all this is to investigate, as well as check your kid's understanding. Peruse the homeworks; is there critical thinking going on, or just basic memorization? Can your kid think independently and do they have some amount of problem solving skills? What do some of the tests they took look like? Are they very basic, or does earning an A on them involve being able to do more than that? Give them logic questions, or some easy math contest questions, or even some SAT type questions... can they figure it out? Or do they quit almost immediately saying something like "we weren't taught that" ? If the latter, and if it's something you believe they should know how to figure it out, then that should raise a red flag with you. These type of things will let you directly glimpse into how they are thinking and approaching problems. To be successful in high school, an 8th grader should be able to display a reasonable degree of problem solving and willingness to figure out something that they don't initially know how to do.

I'm not just saying this; I've tutored many high schoolers in math who were really struggling despite having been good students in middle school, and even having good grades in general in high school. Parents are always shocked and don't know what happened. I work with their kid and pretty quickly by far the most common patterns are a combination of: 1) They don't really understand basic fundamentals, i.e manipulating fractions, or basic algebraic skills, or 2) They cannot think beyond the examples the teacher gave in class; if a problem is even a little different they just shut down, which signifies a lack of any kind of problem solving ability.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honest question: why don’t some of the parents of the gifted/advanced kids look into skipping a grade if school is so boring for them? That’s what the truly advanced kids did when I was in school...
My kid is a September birthday and thus very young for her grade. Skipping her a grade would put a 7 yo in with 9 yos. That seems like a bad idea socially--she's smart, not mature. The challenge is that the math being taught this year is remedial at best. So slow. So basic. So boring. No critical thinking required whatsoever. At least 2/3 of the class is bored out of their minds.


They can spend that time working on their numerals. At 7 kids need tons of exercise to get their hand muscles up to speed.

100% of 2nd grade math in virtual school is on the screen. It's typed only this year. Most of class is spent with kids explaining how they figured out the sum of 7+4 or how they determined the hundreds place in 321. Think 15 minutes per problem. Soooooooo slow.


The pace of ES math this year is galatial. My first grader is basically going to spend the entire year learning numerals up to 110 and how to add numbers 0-9 to each other and subtract the same from each other. SO slow.



Yes, public schools are online but you can still provide a paper and pencil to your kid. My tested at 99th% for math. I make him write equations using the numbers they are working on while he is waiting. Like separating 7 into 2 smaller number and then adding those to 4 etc. etc. Or getting as close to 50 or x using those numbers. He can usually do one thing while the class is talking about the 7+4.
So you sit next to your son and give him a different set of instructions while the teacher is instructing the class? Isn't that disruptive? Don't you have a job? #helicopterparent
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


I completely agree. I think AAP is ridiculous and over utilized. I have a good friend who is an AAP teacher and she put it this way, which I agree with: an AAP/GT program is not for the truly advanced when half of the grade level is in that program. Then it's just to brag that "my kid is advanced." Most are not, and that's in her experience in a highly rated AAP center school. There are so many ways to press your way into AAP, at this point. I know people who've done it.

My kid did not do AAP. DC was not selected for advanced math in ES (but should have been, but I didn't complain). DC is in 8th. All honors 7th and 8th. Straight A's. And our principal says that the kids taking all honors are taking the same curriculum as AAP kids. So DC is successfully doing AAP work.

I have no gripe with my kid not doing AAP in ES as DC didn't want to do it. I didn't care to push hard. DC was succeeding. And now exceeding most of DC's peers. Hopefully that will continue, but who knows?

I believe ES AAP is not necessary based on our experience and my interactions / knowledge with AAP at our ES. It's a waste of resources. It should be eliminated.


So you're basing your assessment on your child's single non-AAP school experience and secondhand knowledge in maybe a handful of conversations?

Completely worthless opinion then.


No less valid that an AAP parent having views on what their child's education would be like w/o it.

And my opinion is actually of value. I've experienced "gen ed" and Honors classes for my child (and the equivalent of AAP in our MS, per our principal). The AAP experience in no way prohibited DC from excelling now. And I have many friends, as well as AAP teachers, who've I've talked with a lot about this.

But, I guess you don't want to hear anything that doesn't confirm your own view.
Anonymous
pettifogger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


I completely agree. I think AAP is ridiculous and over utilized. I have a good friend who is an AAP teacher and she put it this way, which I agree with: an AAP/GT program is not for the truly advanced when half of the grade level is in that program. Then it's just to brag that "my kid is advanced." Most are not, and that's in her experience in a highly rated AAP center school. There are so many ways to press your way into AAP, at this point. I know people who've done it.

My kid did not do AAP. DC was not selected for advanced math in ES (but should have been, but I didn't complain). DC is in 8th. All honors 7th and 8th. Straight A's. And our principal says that the kids taking all honors are taking the same curriculum as AAP kids. So DC is successfully doing AAP work.

I have no gripe with my kid not doing AAP in ES as DC didn't want to do it. I didn't care to push hard. DC was succeeding. And now exceeding most of DC's peers. Hopefully that will continue, but who knows?

I believe ES AAP is not necessary based on our experience and my interactions / knowledge with AAP at our ES. It's a waste of resources. It should be eliminated.


Irrespective of AAP or not, I would urge you to consider checking in detail what your child actually knows vs their gaps. Per your bolded statements it seems that you overly trust what school admins are saying. Doing well in middle school classes does not necessarily translate into doing well high school classes, as there are so many kids who get A's in middle school and end up struggling in high school.

There are so many more factors you need to consider; i.e is the teacher appropriately challenging the kids vs giving them easy assignments, is your kid actually working hard and getting A's or just coasting, is the school and teacher known for academic excellence or just average... etc, etc. The only way to find out all this is to investigate, as well as check your kid's understanding. Peruse the homeworks; is there critical thinking going on, or just basic memorization? Can your kid think independently and do they have some amount of problem solving skills? What do some of the tests they took look like? Are they very basic, or does earning an A on them involve being able to do more than that? Give them logic questions, or some easy math contest questions, or even some SAT type questions... can they figure it out? Or do they quit almost immediately saying something like "we weren't taught that" ? If the latter, and if it's something you believe they should know how to figure it out, then that should raise a red flag with you. These type of things will let you directly glimpse into how they are thinking and approaching problems. To be successful in high school, an 8th grader should be able to display a reasonable degree of problem solving and willingness to figure out something that they don't initially know how to do.

I'm not just saying this; I've tutored many high schoolers in math who were really struggling despite having been good students in middle school, and even having good grades in general in high school. Parents are always shocked and don't know what happened. I work with their kid and pretty quickly by far the most common patterns are a combination of: 1) They don't really understand basic fundamentals, i.e manipulating fractions, or basic algebraic skills, or 2) They cannot think beyond the examples the teacher gave in class; if a problem is even a little different they just shut down, which signifies a lack of any kind of problem solving ability.


Agree (I'm the person you're responding to). That's why I said "hopefully it will continue." I'm well aware that HS is more difficult. But, that doesn't really change that DC is excelling and had no benefit from AAP in ES. Or are you saying only if they were AAP they'll do well in HS? That, I would take issue with.

My child also has a math enrichment tutor precisely b/c it is a HS level class and I was concerned the online would be an issue. I've listened to the class recordings and, by and large, DC's teachers are doing an outstanding job. My one concern is English. But, I've had concerns about how FCPS teaches that for the entirety of my child's time in school.
pettifogger
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
pettifogger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


I completely agree. I think AAP is ridiculous and over utilized. I have a good friend who is an AAP teacher and she put it this way, which I agree with: an AAP/GT program is not for the truly advanced when half of the grade level is in that program. Then it's just to brag that "my kid is advanced." Most are not, and that's in her experience in a highly rated AAP center school. There are so many ways to press your way into AAP, at this point. I know people who've done it.

My kid did not do AAP. DC was not selected for advanced math in ES (but should have been, but I didn't complain). DC is in 8th. All honors 7th and 8th. Straight A's. And our principal says that the kids taking all honors are taking the same curriculum as AAP kids. So DC is successfully doing AAP work.

I have no gripe with my kid not doing AAP in ES as DC didn't want to do it. I didn't care to push hard. DC was succeeding. And now exceeding most of DC's peers. Hopefully that will continue, but who knows?

I believe ES AAP is not necessary based on our experience and my interactions / knowledge with AAP at our ES. It's a waste of resources. It should be eliminated.


Irrespective of AAP or not, I would urge you to consider checking in detail what your child actually knows vs their gaps. Per your bolded statements it seems that you overly trust what school admins are saying. Doing well in middle school classes does not necessarily translate into doing well high school classes, as there are so many kids who get A's in middle school and end up struggling in high school.

There are so many more factors you need to consider; i.e is the teacher appropriately challenging the kids vs giving them easy assignments, is your kid actually working hard and getting A's or just coasting, is the school and teacher known for academic excellence or just average... etc, etc. The only way to find out all this is to investigate, as well as check your kid's understanding. Peruse the homeworks; is there critical thinking going on, or just basic memorization? Can your kid think independently and do they have some amount of problem solving skills? What do some of the tests they took look like? Are they very basic, or does earning an A on them involve being able to do more than that? Give them logic questions, or some easy math contest questions, or even some SAT type questions... can they figure it out? Or do they quit almost immediately saying something like "we weren't taught that" ? If the latter, and if it's something you believe they should know how to figure it out, then that should raise a red flag with you. These type of things will let you directly glimpse into how they are thinking and approaching problems. To be successful in high school, an 8th grader should be able to display a reasonable degree of problem solving and willingness to figure out something that they don't initially know how to do.

I'm not just saying this; I've tutored many high schoolers in math who were really struggling despite having been good students in middle school, and even having good grades in general in high school. Parents are always shocked and don't know what happened. I work with their kid and pretty quickly by far the most common patterns are a combination of: 1) They don't really understand basic fundamentals, i.e manipulating fractions, or basic algebraic skills, or 2) They cannot think beyond the examples the teacher gave in class; if a problem is even a little different they just shut down, which signifies a lack of any kind of problem solving ability.


Agree (I'm the person you're responding to). That's why I said "hopefully it will continue." I'm well aware that HS is more difficult. But, that doesn't really change that DC is excelling and had no benefit from AAP in ES. Or are you saying only if they were AAP they'll do well in HS? That, I would take issue with.

My child also has a math enrichment tutor precisely b/c it is a HS level class and I was concerned the online would be an issue. I've listened to the class recordings and, by and large, DC's teachers are doing an outstanding job. My one concern is English. But, I've had concerns about how FCPS teaches that for the entirety of my child's time in school.


Nope, not at all, irrespective of AAP. Too many people on these forums are getting a bit too distracted by the AAP program, when they should be more concerned about the lack of rigor and challenge/enrichment fading from the classrooms, across both AAP and not.

The data really does speak for itself in terms of how much money is being poured into tutoring, not just during COVID (which makes sense) but during normal years. If the tutors are mostly doing enrichment, then it's great; it indicates the child is interested and wants to learn more, or perhaps overly agitated parents (hopefully the former). But if the hiring of tutors to help keep up with homework is a pervasive thing in the area, it really says that something is not working correctly in the school and classroom.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honest question: why don’t some of the parents of the gifted/advanced kids look into skipping a grade if school is so boring for them? That’s what the truly advanced kids did when I was in school...
My kid is a September birthday and thus very young for her grade. Skipping her a grade would put a 7 yo in with 9 yos. That seems like a bad idea socially--she's smart, not mature. The challenge is that the math being taught this year is remedial at best. So slow. So basic. So boring. No critical thinking required whatsoever. At least 2/3 of the class is bored out of their minds.


They can spend that time working on their numerals. At 7 kids need tons of exercise to get their hand muscles up to speed.

100% of 2nd grade math in virtual school is on the screen. It's typed only this year. Most of class is spent with kids explaining how they figured out the sum of 7+4 or how they determined the hundreds place in 321. Think 15 minutes per problem. Soooooooo slow.


The pace of ES math this year is galatial. My first grader is basically going to spend the entire year learning numerals up to 110 and how to add numbers 0-9 to each other and subtract the same from each other. SO slow.



Yes, public schools are online but you can still provide a paper and pencil to your kid. My tested at 99th% for math. I make him write equations using the numbers they are working on while he is waiting. Like separating 7 into 2 smaller number and then adding those to 4 etc. etc. Or getting as close to 50 or x using those numbers. He can usually do one thing while the class is talking about the 7+4.
So you sit next to your son and give him a different set of instructions while the teacher is instructing the class? Isn't that disruptive? Don't you have a job? #helicopterparent


No, I told him what to do if he is done before everyone else by a far margin. He writes extra equations on a paper instead of complaining he is bored. And yes, I do have a job.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


So, you went to elementary school in the 90s? Separating kids into different classes based on ability was allowed back then.


Why isn't it now?
Anonymous
How is everyone's kid "gifted"? Can people just accept the fact that this area is full of highly-educated, well-off people and as a result their offspring tend to do well academically. Yes, there are truly gifted kids that need differentiation but I am sick and tired of hearing about Larlo being gifted when they are just a DC/NOVA average smart kid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


So, you went to elementary school in the 90s? Separating kids into different classes based on ability was allowed back then.


Why isn't it now?


Because there was a disproportionate tracking of white and high SES children, while poor and/or children of color were tracked into lower groups. It also was shown to be difficult to move between groupings, so the child's educational track was determined in 3rd grade. They now prefer to cluster kids of differing abilities into each classroom, and allow for kids to be grouped and re-grouped as needed in various subject matters or even units of study within a subject. In theory more equitable, in reality it also means the kids who are truly able to cover advanced material are at the mercy of the teacher who has to differentiate among 25 children with knowledge spanning possibly three or more grade levels.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


So, you went to elementary school in the 90s? Separating kids into different classes based on ability was allowed back then.


Why isn't it now?


Because there was a disproportionate tracking of white and high SES children, while poor and/or children of color were tracked into lower groups. It also was shown to be difficult to move between groupings, so the child's educational track was determined in 3rd grade. They now prefer to cluster kids of differing abilities into each classroom, and allow for kids to be grouped and re-grouped as needed in various subject matters or even units of study within a subject. In theory more equitable, in reality it also means the kids who are truly able to cover advanced material are at the mercy of the teacher who has to differentiate among 25 children with knowledge spanning possibly three or more grade levels.


This. Exactly this. It’s just too bad that when you give most of your time and effort to the bottom, those who are at the top won’t reach their full potential.

https://interactioninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IISC_EqualityEquity.png
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


So, you went to elementary school in the 90s? Separating kids into different classes based on ability was allowed back then.


Why isn't it now?


Because there was a disproportionate tracking of white and high SES children, while poor and/or children of color were tracked into lower groups. It also was shown to be difficult to move between groupings, so the child's educational track was determined in 3rd grade. They now prefer to cluster kids of differing abilities into each classroom, and allow for kids to be grouped and re-grouped as needed in various subject matters or even units of study within a subject. In theory more equitable, in reality it also means the kids who are truly able to cover advanced material are at the mercy of the teacher who has to differentiate among 25 children with knowledge spanning possibly three or more grade levels.


Yes. Clustering is garbage. I see it on a daily basis.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to an excellent public school system in New England, and we had no differentiation or G&T in elementary school. Honors classes (for a couple of subjects) started in middle school (7th grade), with expanded honors/AP options in high school. I graduated in 2002.

However, the parent population was pretty well educated and kept tabs on their kids. Not many behavioral issues or disruptions to distract the teachers. And class sizes were ~22 kids. Everyone was taught the same lesson though. I felt I received a good education (later went to HYP for undergrad)


So, you went to elementary school in the 90s? Separating kids into different classes based on ability was allowed back then.


Why isn't it now?


Because there was a disproportionate tracking of white and high SES children, while poor and/or children of color were tracked into lower groups. It also was shown to be difficult to move between groupings, so the child's educational track was determined in 3rd grade. They now prefer to cluster kids of differing abilities into each classroom, and allow for kids to be grouped and re-grouped as needed in various subject matters or even units of study within a subject. In theory more equitable, in reality it also means the kids who are truly able to cover advanced material are at the mercy of the teacher who has to differentiate among 25 children with knowledge spanning possibly three or more grade levels.


Yes. Clustering is garbage. I see it on a daily basis.


So have kids live in their own socio-economic bubbles even more so than they already do? Kids need to see other kids with different abilities/backgrounds.
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: