Yes, no point in seeking advice to get it from the school. |
.....
If true, I have no idea why your friend was given a second chance to prove his child's fluency, and others were not. There is also another side to this story. Btw, why do YOU think that some of your native speaking friends, acquaintances, etc. are being accepted, and other are not? What differences have you observed personally? Please refer to 5 reasons to get in. Answer is 3. |
Wow, of all the silly claims I've seen on this thread, this is the most egregious. |
Sorry, you misunderstood me. What I meant when I said "this type of issue comes up all the time" had NOTHING TO DO WITH OYSTER. I meant that in my professional life working with DD kids, litigation is very common and FERPA/FOIA requests are sometimes part of that as parents of special needs kids try to get clarity about school district decisions about how their kids will be served. I am not aware of any litigation or threat of litigation whatsoever related to Oyster. |
If true, I have no idea why your friend was given a second chance to prove his child's fluency, and others were not. There is also another side to this story. Btw, why do YOU think that some of your native speaking friends, acquaintances, etc. are being accepted, and other are not? What differences have you observed personally? Please refer to 5 reasons to get in. Answer is 3. Then your friend should try one of the other four options. |
#5 needs to be done ASAP. |
Of course. There are many misconceptions about learning a language (including from inside O-A). Some parents may make an extra effort and others may have more resources, knowledge or even expertise on the issue, but if they are not testing for it (or not properly and/or fairly) it does not make a difference. |
Oral history as an argument is stronger than the dominant discourse of the power elite (which just tries to discourage change). The more stories from people from different backgrounds, experiences...the stronger it gets. |
On the bright side, you may be better off staying away from Oyster the upcoming year as there will be changes that nobody can explain to you (90% Spanish copy cat from Marie Reed for instance). Do I want my child to be a guinea pig? I attended a parent meeting for kinder and decided to look for another school. My IB friend has not made up her mind either and parents who know about language learning will have doubts. Watch the spots for changes and report back.... |
Can you explain this 90% Spanish thing? Is that for kinder? |
Yes. This is an approach common in other dual immersion programs including Marie Reed and Mundo Verde here in DC. As they lay the foundation for the acquisition of Spanish the initial focus is on Spanish. |
But why not 100%? Or why did the prior post make it seem like a change? Just don’t follow if it is new. |
Yes, it is new. 90% because some “specials”, such as music, are in English. |
Oyster’s switch to a 90/10 (Spanish/English) model in PK4 and K is based on research and best practices: https://carla.umn.edu/immersion/acie/vol10/may2007_researchminority.html “ELL students in 90:10 programs attain the same levels of proficiency in English and the same or higher standards of achievement in reading/language arts and math (measured in English) as ELL students in 50:50 programs. Thus, more exposure to instructional time in English does not lead to an improvement in English language proficiency or achievement in reading/language arts and math as measured in English.“ Btw, WIS follows the 90/10 model in PK and K as well. At WIS, 1st through 5th is 50/50. |
You can always find evidence for anything (50:50, 80:20, 90/10...) if you look for it. Nothing convincing was given to us and this "research" you linked is just a summary (no references) more than 10 years old intended for ELL (English Language Learners) not to drop out of school (in San Jose, California?). Would you try a treatment that a doctor gives you based on so called "evidence" that is not up to date? I would not. |