Guys why do you like exceptionally petite woman?

Anonymous
For all those saying that 110 pounds is thick for a petite woman, Kelly Ripa (who is short) once got on a scale on a late night show and she weighed 110.

Nobody in their right mind would call Ripa thick or fat.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Men like petite women.

Women like providers.

Film at 11.


I agree this is the majority for sure.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For all those saying that 110 pounds is thick for a petite woman, Kelly Ripa (who is short) once got on a scale on a late night show and she weighed 110.

Nobody in their right mind would call Ripa thick or fat.


People said 110 is thick for someone who is 5 feet- a specific height. Go back and read.

Kelly Ripa is 5'3". Kelly Ripa exercises religiously. She is muscular and has low body fat. No sane person wpuld call Kelly Ripa fat, you're right. The thing is, you're the only person in this thread talking about Kelly Ripa.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I had a femaile boss who was 6'3" without shoes. She wore 4" heels every day. And she was a big woman with a helmet of hair that added a couple more inches. She was a monster but I guess that is what she was trying for. She was single.


LOL I'm glad someone brought this up! We knew one too, people called her Refrigerator Perry. I'm a woman and have seen these types and wonder...what the heck are they thinking. Wear flats, lose weight, go to a good hair stylist, wear clothes that are feminine. Certainly ones that give the illusion of being shorter.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I know for my husband (6 ft 5 inches) he told me he specifically went for girls under 5 ft 5 because he didn't want his daughters to be over 6 ft. He had a niece that height and it was incredibly difficult for her. So he went for petite women in hopes of "evening" things out.


That's another big reason. My niece married a guy 6 ft 7 inches. She is 6 ft, and their 6 year old is looking to be a giant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Men like petite women.

Women like providers.

Film at 11.


I agree this is the majority for sure.

No men like women not little girls who shop in the kids department
Anonymous
I work with a 6' black lady. She's freaking gorgeous in her heals despite carrying some extra weight. Married with 5 kids.

My cousin, on the other hand, is very short. Battling with those last few pounds became her life, because what looks like nothing on an average or tall woman makes her phugly. She is a mother of one, and her pregnancy was very difficult. Apparently, short stature makes it tougher to accommodate a growing human. Doctors refused to deliver her vaginally, so she had to have a section.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all those saying that 110 pounds is thick for a petite woman, Kelly Ripa (who is short) once got on a scale on a late night show and she weighed 110.

Nobody in their right mind would call Ripa thick or fat.


People said 110 is thick for someone who is 5 feet- a specific height. Go back and read.

Kelly Ripa is 5'3". Kelly Ripa exercises religiously. She is muscular and has low body fat. No sane person wpuld call Kelly Ripa fat, you're right. The thing is, you're the only person in this thread talking about Kelly Ripa.

I'm barely 5', very thin boned. When I was 93lbs in my 20s, I looked skinny, tiny, like a kid. I was probably a size 00, but back then, they didn't have a 00, and a size 0 was even kind of lose on me.

I gained weight later in life and now weigh about 113. I look "normal", but still slimish - range from a size 2 to 4. I get comments about how "thin" I am.

So, no, 110lb on 5' woman is not fat. But, yes, 5lb of fat on a 5' person shows easily.
Anonymous
Let's be honest, most men would date a girl with good proportions (which can happen at any height, regardless of what people claim here) and a gorgeous face, regardless of height. The extremes in height might be exceptions, but we're talking about real extremes, like the bottom and top percentile.

Look at celebrities who have choices galore...they tend to date all over the height spectrum.
Anonymous
Petite usually means small everywhere. Petite women have petite vaginas.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Petite usually means small everywhere. Petite women have petite vaginas.


I don't know. My petite vagina managed to push out 2 9lb and 1 10lb baby without needing stitches. One downside to marrying a guy a foot taller than you!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, most men would date a girl with good proportions (which can happen at any height, regardless of what people claim here) and a gorgeous face, regardless of height. The extremes in height might be exceptions, but we're talking about real extremes, like the bottom and top percentile.

Look at celebrities who have choices galore...they tend to date all over the height spectrum.


In theory, yes. In practice, taller people tend to be better proportioned. (I am not talking about weight.) There is a pretty good reason with men and women going out of their way to appear taller, i.e. proportioned like a taller person. I mean who would tolerate the heels otherwise? Who would come up with human growth hormone for perfectly healthy children?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Petite usually means small everywhere. Petite women have petite vaginas.

Balderdash. Married twice, petite and not petite. Not petite is a whole lot tighter by far. The vaginal muscle has nothing to do with height.
ZachF
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Petite usually means small everywhere. Petite women have petite vaginas.

Balderdash. Married twice, petite and not petite. Not petite is a whole lot tighter by far. The vaginal muscle has nothing to do with height.


It has nothing to do with anything and differs from woman to woman of every height and size. There is no correlation. Not even childbirth makes a difference. The tightest I've had each had two children.
Anonymous
Most like feminine woman regardless. However easier to pull of is one is smaller versus larger.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: