Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

I completely agree with you- it's ridiculous that overly-sensitive people are flipping out because of one person's preference, especially when it's likely they have physical preferences of their own.

The only thing is, at 110 pounds and 5 ft, you aren't petite. You a short, but a husky, sturdy thing.

Anonymous wrote:For some of the PPs who say that taller is better/more attractive, I don't find that to be true for women at all (models excepted). I know so many tall women who can't even get a date, whereas all of the short, cute women I know are swarming with men. I think it is a real disadvantage in this country to be too tall as a woman. Maybe it's fine in the Scandinavian countries, but not in the US.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since sizes vary so widely I go by waist size. I wear a 24" jeans, am 5'3 and 112. I'm very muscular, muscle is heavy.

Muscle is not heavy. It is just more compact so you can weigh more but look thinner if you're muscular. A pound is a pound no matter if it's fat or muscle, it's just that fat is sloppy and big looking and muscle is tight and firm so you look smaller. If you weigh 120 lbs but are muscular you still weigh the same as a 120 lb skinny fat girl. You just look better.

Anonymous wrote:I have a long held theory about this: I think some men are aroused by young girls (like age 11+) but thankfully would never act on that attraction. The answer, then, is petite women.

Anonymous wrote:Because you can flip them around/maneuver into different positions during sex. You feel stronger and more masculine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a long held theory about this: I think some men are aroused by young girls (like age 11+) but thankfully would never act on that attraction. The answer, then, is petite women.

+1, latent pediphilia. Plus small penis. And probably something to do with late blooming, being intimidated by sexually mature-sized women.

Anonymous wrote:I have a long held theory about this: I think some men are aroused by young girls (like age 11+) but thankfully would never act on that attraction. The answer, then, is petite women.

Anonymous wrote:Funny I'm 5'5 and 112 lbs but round and meaty, not petite

Anonymous wrote:I consider Jennifer Love Hewitt to be petite at 5'2". She has an awesome body that could cause a cardiac arrest in a yak. She is why men like petite women.