Your snowflake doesn't need a snack.

Anonymous
My child has been in two elementary schools in fcps over the last 4 years and every year they have snack time. You send in a snack for your child, or if you don't want them to have a snack, you don't send it. But then the no snack kids convince the snack kids to share with them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kids may not need a snack to survive, but they may need it to concentrate or behave. It is pretty common in elementary school. I think op is making a bigger every deal about it that it needs to be.


Way to teach your child that you should let your emotions and feelings drive eating


Please educate yourself about basic human physiology. First, ability to concentrate isn't an emotion. Second, difficulty with concentration, impulse control and emotional regulation are completely normal, predictable consequences of going too long without eating (and young kids, due to basic differences in physiology, often need to eat more frequently than adults do). What you do in your house is your business, but please keep your eating disorder away from my children and their education.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My child has been in two elementary schools in fcps over the last 4 years and every year they have snack time. You send in a snack for your child, or if you don't want them to have a snack, you don't send it. But then the no snack kids convince the snack kids to share with them.


We have a super strict no sharing policy at our school due to allergies.

That said we are supposed to pack a snack because my 3 rd grade child doesn't eat till 12:40 and my 4 th grade child at 1:00. Since they eat around 7:15-30 I think that's perfectly fine.
ThatBetch
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
ThatBetch wrote:Assume a 4.5 hour gap between the meal and the end of school (it's less, but for argument's sake...).

Let's say the kids are somewhere around 8.


In that scenario I'd be pro-snack. Everyone flags a bit in the afternoon anyway, and being hungry on top of that just seems to stack the deck against them. Will they die of starvation? No. But if a snack revives their energy and gets them across the finish line, why not?

OP, is the problem that you find this mom annoying generally?


I find people in general annoying. These particular people are constantly, erm, "looking for things to improve" is probably a polite way to word it. I have to be "nice" now, lest people here think my sense of snark represents actual angst. Truth be told, I give no actual fscks. My kid won't suffer if class gets interrupted for snack time, nor will my snowflake (which is a no-no word, or so I'm told by someone who thinks "twat" is fair play ) face undue hardship if they're forced to wait until after school to eat more. There are some privilege issues that irritate me, esp. as we're at a high-FARMS school, so "just have everyone bring an organic cheese stick (and a way to keep it cold) and some organic fruit!" is a bit rich. And the "kids do better if they're not hungry" folks, at least those on the listserv, would be horrified if I sent my kid with some Skittles or a Ring Ding (yes!!!) for a quick carbohydrate boost. There are some "Jaysus, don't we already ask enough of our teachers?!" issues, too. Were I to give enough of a damn to post directly, that would be my main point. But ultimately, teachers are adults who can speak for themselves and I don't really care enough either way to get involved. I just thought DCUM might, and you didn't disappoint!

Personally, I've sent my kid with a snack for after school if it's been one of those days or a growth spurt or they've been especially "hangry" of late. But I would never tell my kid to ask to interrupt or leave class to go eat. I definitely wouldn't rally the troops on a school-wide listserv about it.

It's not at all a "we must be rail thin" thing, at least, not from me. More an opportunity to understand that life gets uncomfortable sometimes, and this is an easy way to start teaching kids how to handle that concept w/o actual risk. I recognize I'm in the minority when it comes to seeing that as a valuable lesson; I know plenty of adults who can't handle being uncomfortable!

If you're unmanageably hangry if you don't eat every 4 hours, maybe you should get that checked. I mean, do you wake your kids for night feeds, too?
Anonymous
Boy, OP, I think you sound pretty hangry yourself. Or like your just a shit stirrer and really proud of it. I'm sorry that's your life. Be well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My kids school allows food. It's nice not to have to force feed them breakfast before 8, they just pull out their "snack" when they are hungry.


Blizzard warning.
Anonymous
My kid's elementary school started at 8:50 and in first grade, they ate lunch at 10:45. By around 2:30, most of them were legitimately hungry and distracted. I think it depends on the circumstances.
ThatBetch
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:Boy, OP, I think you sound pretty hangry yourself. Or like your just a shit stirrer and really proud of it. I'm sorry that's your life. Be well.


I think you have me confused with plastic knife guy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it typical of American schools to feed children at odd times or not to feed them a healthy afternoon snack? Perhaps that is why obesity is such an issue.
In our elementary school, kids had to eat at odd times because there wasn't enough cafeteria space to feed them all at actual lunch time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My DD is in K and they eat lunch at 10:30am. No snack and dismissal is after 3. She gets home at 3:45 and is extremely crabby and hungry.

I have an EdD and think it's foolishness to expect anyone to learn when they are distractingly hungry. And yes, a 5-year-old who hasn't eaten anything for 4-5 hours is distracted and can't absorb instruction.

Instruction time lost to snacking would be more than made up in quality of instruction time remaining. 1 hour spent attempting to teach hungry 5-year-olds would be better spent divided into snacking and then using the remaining time to teach nourished, comfortable kids.

Anyone pretending this is a "special snowflake" issue doesn't understand the physiological needs that need to be met for school learning to happen.


Feed her a higher protein lunch.

My kid is in K. Lunch at 10:30 dismissal at 2:30. Home by three, snack (usually what he didn't eat from lunch) then homework then a brief nap.

He is so busy socializing he doesn't eat much some days. He'll learn eventually.

No snack is necessary.
Anonymous
My 8 year old eats breakfast at 7:30 am. Lunch for his age group is 1:25 pm. They allow a 5 minute snack. I eat breakfast with my son, I'm hungry at 11:30, I could never make it until 1:30.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Boy, OP, I think you sound pretty hangry yourself. Or like your just a shit stirrer and really proud of it. I'm sorry that's your life. Be well.


Seriously. And given you sign in (and the id you've chosen) I am going with the latter.
Anonymous
Our children get an afternoon snack. They have since K and she is in older elementary now. It's a non-issue. Seamless.

Frankly, many kids eat constantly b/c they are indeed hungry. Mine does (though you wouldn't know it to look at her). She gets extremely "hangry" when she can't eat.

I don't see what the damn deal is. Give the snacks. JYou revel in your 20 mile walks to school in the snow with no boots. In the meantime, my kid will be enjoying her granola bar and learning more w/o having being distracted by hunger.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My DD is in K and they eat lunch at 10:30am. No snack and dismissal is after 3. She gets home at 3:45 and is extremely crabby and hungry.

I have an EdD and think it's foolishness to expect anyone to learn when they are distractingly hungry. And yes, a 5-year-old who hasn't eaten anything for 4-5 hours is distracted and can't absorb instruction.

Instruction time lost to snacking would be more than made up in quality of instruction time remaining. 1 hour spent attempting to teach hungry 5-year-olds would be better spent divided into snacking and then using the remaining time to teach nourished, comfortable kids.

Anyone pretending this is a "special snowflake" issue doesn't understand the physiological needs that need to be met for school learning to happen.


Feed her a higher protein lunch.

My kid is in K. Lunch at 10:30 dismissal at 2:30. Home by three, snack (usually what he didn't eat from lunch) then homework then a brief nap.

He is so busy socializing he doesn't eat much some days. He'll learn eventually.

No snack is necessary.


For YOUR SON. Just to clarify that you don't speak for everyone's child.
Anonymous
A 5 year old who leaves home at 6:45 and gets home at 3 could certainly use an afternoon snack, especially when lunch is at 10:30 a.m.
post reply Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: