There are several reasons, but a big one is the rampant fear among the lululemon set that if they let their kids actually eat when they want to eat, they'll end up fat. And having a fat kid is just as bad as being fat yourself. Maybe worse. |
It's rude and messy. Do you want to sit next to someone who is eating and crunching while you are working? FWIW, I was a teacher. Kids could bring a snack and eat it outside at recess. Problem solved. |
+1 When I was in ES (70's), we had a recess time where kids would have a snack if they wanted and the lunch, with additional time to play outside if we wanted. In middle school (80's) there was a break called "nutrition" -- only about 15 minutes but, as the name implies, was to allow for a snack if needed, and then lunch was later. |
In 4th grade, my child had the last lunch of the day that was not until 1:15. The teacher incorporated a morning circle time around 11am that included snacks. I imagine the same could be true if a grade has a 11am lunch and instruction goes until 3:30. |
And when I was in France I saw more 4-5 year olds sucking on pacifiers than I could possibly imagine. Why is the French way better than ours? |
So many aspects of our public education system are still stuck in the Middle Ages. |
I'm a teacher and my admin doesn't allow snacks at all, even for the grades who have lunch very early or vey late. We are a high FARMS school, and many students do not have enough food at home to bring in a snack so it would be a case of the haves and have nots. There is also an allergy concern since it's difficult to completely regulate what kids bring from home. Students at my school speak over 20 languages, and some of them are very difficult to find translation for information that goes home to parents.
It would cost a lot of money for the school to provide the snack, so that's out. So they don't have snack and so far everyone has survived. Maybe it's not ideal in all situations, but it's reality. I do think the snacking culture has gotten out of control. We had a sports practice on Friday evening and a few families had coolers full of snacks for their kids (siblings of players) to graze on. Then the players saw their siblings eating so they would walk away from practice to come have a snack too. It happened during the game as well, and the game was at 1pm, so right after lunchtime. Even if they had an early lunch before 12pm they still should be able to wait a few hours before eating again. This was stuff like granola bars and crackers. These kids are being taught that they need to be eating constantly. |
This. |
When was the last time you went to any event where moms were standing around and there were NO Starbucks cups? |
They are awful, though as we learned from our pediatric neurologist, migraines are really a term for any 'unexplained' headache. At least that's how she uses the term. But a first grader who can't stand light, and just wimpers until he is put to bed in a dark room with no sound, is a heartbreaking sight. The fact that making sure to eat some protein at least every four hours seems to keep the worst of the headaches at bay has me firmly in the SNACK-YES camp. |
When I was in elementary school almost 50 years ago, we indeed got a snack time. So the idea that kids should not go too long without eating for optimal educational time isn't a new one. And no one thought of '60s kids as "snowflakes." |
I hate the term "snack constantly"! So sick of hearing it. Having a snack or two in a day around meals does not mean snacking constantly, it means eating every 3 hours. Last time I checked, stuffing yourself past the point of being full so that you can make it to the next meal without being lightheaded and ravenous wasn't good either. Want to get kids to ignore their stopping point? Tell them they can't eat for 5 hours. Then when they're older and more in control of their food choices they'll have the capacity to eat more volume since they had to stuff themselves earlier in life and they won't have the ability to put down their fork when they're perfectly full because they won't know anymore what that means. My kids are in elementary and there's no snack. They wake up early and I try to delay them eating breakfast as long as I can do they can make it to lunch. I am feeding them high protein/high fat meals (i.e. Not a pop tart or cereal) and they're fine but I still worry that all those extra portions they're taking on so they can focus on the class right before lunch properly will mean not that they'll "snack constantly" but they will overeat as adults. There is nothing wrong with 1-2 snacks a day for active kids eating healthy foods! None! |
Ahhh, recess! That would be really nice if we lived in a world where kids still got recess! |
Sad and moronic post. |
Kids still get recess. |