+1000. Narrowmindness at its best |
Typical white girl thinking that anyone who isn't like her is brainwashed. Go ahead, tell the brown natives what to do. |
What rights? You don't have any right to see other people's faces. You tearing the niqab off the face of a woman who wants to be covered IS violence. Sorry. |
I think any woman who shows her butt crack is being forced into it by society expectations. The same for shortie shorts that offer me a magnified view of the wearer's camel toe. Especially on teen girls. Plus, it makes my skin crawl. I'd like to ban it, please. I don't believe women who wear that are doing it on their own free will. |
I thought sometimes butt crack displays were due to simple fact that some people are overweight. Who knew. |
I'm not telling anyone what to do. I have an opinion about it, but I'm certainly not dictating it. And what "natives" are you talking about? Is it your belief that the Muslims in the U.S. are "natives"? No one's talking about traveling to majority muslim countries and telling them they can't wear niqabs. The debate is about whether they ought to be allowed to in countries where they are most certainly not natives. And yes, I do think it's brainwashing. I think that in order to believe that the sight of your fact is sacrilegious, you must be convinced that you are to be controlled and minimized. Your power is diminished. |
As a skinny girl, I thought it's because of the dearth of non-ultra-low-rise pants. Although I guess that's societal. I'd be happy to ban them. |
If there were a religion telling them they had to do that, I'd agree with you. As it is, I find it distasteful, but not brainwashing. |
I know you're kidding, but they actually are banned in some places in the U.S. I'm fine with that. I don't want to see your butt. |
If you tell a woman that she must wear a niqab or be subject to violence, that;'s a violation of her rights. Duh. And I do think I have a security interest in being able to see the face of a person I'm encountering in a public place. I could care less what people do in the private sphere (their homes, private schools, whatever), but in public places, yes, I think it's a security issue. |
That's your interpretation. Women who cover their faces may very well believe that you aren't special enough to see them. The sight of their face is reserved only for special people, and you aren't one of them. The "native" part is not about citizenship in any particular country. It's about you believing that people who believe different things from you must need enlightenment. |
Statistically, the highest evels of domestic violence correspond to the highest levels of gender inequality. I would like to see less abuse. If you call that enlightenment, okay. |
What makes you think women who cover their faces do it out of fear of violence? You know there's no requirement for it in religion or in the law. You are incapable of believing that a woman may choose to cover her face, and that makes you small-minded. Well, I don't think you have a security interest in being able to see the face of a person in a public place. You may prefer it; it may make you uncomfortable to not have it, but your opinion or comfort level are not relevant to public policy. It's simply none of your business. |
Somewhere in DC, right now, there's a woman being slapped around, and she's uncovered. You have no way of showing niqabs correlate with domestic violence. You just made that up. |
Absolutely. In my opinion, these complete coverings serve the purpose of isolating women from broader society and making them only interact with those of their own religious community of believers. |