Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the PP attacking TSFG and apparently spending thousands of dollars on designer clothes and bags:

Please spend a little less on clothes and bags and a little more on therapy. You have ISSUES, honey. Wow, are you unpleasant.

P.S. I think spending $1000 on a purse is ridiculous. I'm a woman, so I guess you'll have to think of other insults for me (since you can't say I'm angry and bitter about not being able to "provide" an expensive bag for a lady).

Woman: you apparently have some kind of a relationship with this pathetic loser that posts on a woman's forum. You are not worth an insult.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:If it makes me a loser to think it's silly to spend 250 on a paper bag with someones name on it. Something that probably cost them 5 bucks to make, Then call me a loser.

You are a loser for posting in a fashion forum about women's purses. You are a loser for endlessly referencing some useless (and pretty cheap) bag that nobody here ever considered nor recommended. Not every attempt by even a famous designer is a gem, everybody knows this. But what you don't understand is why is that. You, in your boundless cluelessness, think that it's enough to slap a label on whatever crappy bag and it will sell. It is not so.

Designing is hard and it takes a lot of talent to think and make a great bag. Because of that, just like in everything else, in general expensive bags (items) are better than cheap bags (items). Just because you see no difference does not mean that there is no difference, just that you don't know where to look. I don't see a difference among various screwdrivers but if someone with interest and knowledge tells me that there is a difference then I accept it, rather than telling him that he is a fool for wanting something that costs $15 when $1 is just as good.

Btw, which car do you drive? Just curious.

Because that crappy 250 dollar paper bag on that link is sold out. Even if they only made 5 that means that 5 people bought the stupid thing. (not to mention that it is on the mens line of products.)
The difference between one 100% cotton T-shirt selling for 15 and one 100% cotton T-shirt selling for 100 is neglible (except for one was made by a "famous designer" really? you designed a single color T-shirt where do I sign up.
Oh and just to satisfy your curiosity I have two An Olds Alero with 206K miles on it that I drive everyday and a GMC Sierra. I have better things to do with my money

Right. Or you simply have little money and therefore can't attract women so you have to troll here on a fashion forum hoping that someone will PP you.

TSFG is hot, regardless of what he drives, and he's smarter than you are for sure.

Do you know him?

Yes

Anonymous wrote:I have never understood the appeal of bags. Shoes, dresses, jewelry, even sunglasses but bags? No.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never understood the appeal of bags. Shoes, dresses, jewelry, even sunglasses but bags? No.

Me neither. I just want a few functional, neutral bags that go with everything. Dunno about a lot of the crazy posters in this thread, but I put shit in bags. That's what they're for. Find one that you like that holds your shit. Who cares how much someone else spent?

ZenLady wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:If it makes me a loser to think it's silly to spend 250 on a paper bag with someones name on it. Something that probably cost them 5 bucks to make, Then call me a loser.

You are a loser for posting in a fashion forum about women's purses. You are a loser for endlessly referencing some useless (and pretty cheap) bag that nobody here ever considered nor recommended. Not every attempt by even a famous designer is a gem, everybody knows this. But what you don't understand is why is that. You, in your boundless cluelessness, think that it's enough to slap a label on whatever crappy bag and it will sell. It is not so.

Designing is hard and it takes a lot of talent to think and make a great bag. Because of that, just like in everything else, in general expensive bags (items) are better than cheap bags (items). Just because you see no difference does not mean that there is no difference, just that you don't know where to look. I don't see a difference among various screwdrivers but if someone with interest and knowledge tells me that there is a difference then I accept it, rather than telling him that he is a fool for wanting something that costs $15 when $1 is just as good.

Btw, which car do you drive? Just curious.

Because that crappy 250 dollar paper bag on that link is sold out. Even if they only made 5 that means that 5 people bought the stupid thing. (not to mention that it is on the mens line of products.)
The difference between one 100% cotton T-shirt selling for 15 and one 100% cotton T-shirt selling for 100 is neglible (except for one was made by a "famous designer" really? you designed a single color T-shirt where do I sign up.
Oh and just to satisfy your curiosity I have two An Olds Alero with 206K miles on it that I drive everyday and a GMC Sierra. I have better things to do with my money

Right. Or you simply have little money and therefore can't attract women so you have to troll here on a fashion forum hoping that someone will PP you.

TSFG is hot, regardless of what he drives, and he's smarter than you are for sure.

Do you know him?

Yes

PM me. We need to talk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never understood the appeal of bags. Shoes, dresses, jewelry, even sunglasses but bags? No.

Me neither. I just want a few functional, neutral bags that go with everything. Dunno about a lot of the crazy posters in this thread, but I put shit in bags. That's what they're for. Find one that you like that holds your shit. Who cares how much someone else spent?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too funny that people convince themselves that those idiotic labels matter, just like they pretend that thy always wear cute little sundresses to chase kids at the playground.

It's not about the labels - people who don't follow fashion (i.e. most people) don't even know which labels are considered good. It is always on the lower (cheaper) end that logos and such are most prominent. I have people ask me all the time where I bought designer stuff (that they can't afford) because they don't recognize the designers. They just like the way it looks but don't understand that those looks cost.

How much money do you have? Just curious. I mean, invested, not your purse inventory.

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of which, I bought guys wranglers the other day since I needed work jeans. The pockets work! Real live functional pockets! Don't give a damn wha they look like...functional work clothing rocks.

Why are you reading the fashion forum?

Because fashion without function is pointless

Because I'm sick of women's pants without pockets that will even hold a cell phone. It is freaking ridiculous. Men's clothing manages to have nifty pockets, buttons in useful places, and is made to be tailored. At the same price point, women's clothing is cheaply made, has little fake nonfunctional pockets, and is difficult if not impossible to alter without disassembling the entire garment. Women's pants get possibly 3 inseam choices, men get them every inch or two at the most, if they don't come unhemmed to be hemmed to order.


Some of us actually work in clothing: something besides sit in an office and shuffle papers.

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only $250, but looks like much less!

http://www.ln-cc.com/invt/jil0110027car

This one is already sold out!

250 for a paper bag. You people can't be serious.

Stop trolling. Nobody suggested that bag - it was posted by some cheapo convinced her $50 bag looks great.

How is it trolling to point out the silliness of a 250 dollar paper bag with some designers name on it THAT THEY SOLD OUT OF so some fool bought it.
How is it trolling to look on in wonder of people that are willing to spend 500 on a pair of jeans. Sure I do ok even for this area, but I would rather invest or use that money on life expereinces.

I don't think you do ok, actually. Successful men - i.e. men who can buy these bags to their wives without even bothering to think about the whole issue - are too busy to post here at work hours. You do sound like a loser trolling a fashion forum in order to pick up women. Your anger at expensive bags suggests a frustration that women want things you are not able to give them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never understood the appeal of bags. Shoes, dresses, jewelry, even sunglasses but bags? No.

Me neither. I just want a few functional, neutral bags that go with everything. Dunno about a lot of the crazy posters in this thread, but I put shit in bags. That's what they're for. Find one that you like that holds your shit. Who cares how much someone else spent?