Mika Brzezinski "risky behavior out there that happens to be connected to birth control"

Anonymous
On Thursday’s Morning Joe, Rick Santorum‘s comments about contraception came up for discussion. The show played clips of Santorum explaining his beliefs about the “dangers” of contraception, stating simply that it “is not okay.” Following up, Joe Scarborough asked Mika Brzezinski‘s opinion on the topic, deeming her, “more conservative, I think, than many,” on social issues.

Brzezinski sympathized with Santorum’s perspective “as a father, and a man who’s held public office.” She went on to say:

It’s a conversation probably every family should have, about birth control and its role in society with their own kids. He’s got his own, and he stands by them, and I think he’s an interesting part of the national conversation in terms of where our society is going. And there is a lot of risky behavior out there that happens to be connected to birth control. So there’s a whole other side to this conversation. And not once did I say should it be banned, or should it not be covered by health insurance. But I think it’s OK to have those beliefs or those concerns.

Along with stating her own views of “risky behavior” linked to birth control — a comment many are likely to notice — she also defended Santorum’s right to have his own personal beliefs and concerns.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/mika-brzezinski-a-lot-of-risky-behavior-happens-to-be-connected-to-birth-control/

Santorum's position is no one should have sex unless it leads to procreation. So...Mika it is not about your children getting birth control and engaging in risky behavior. It is about you Mika being on birth control and having sex. In other words, you as a grown woman are not to be trusted with birth control because you might have sex with your husband for fun. WTF
Anonymous
OP, did you watch this live on TV this morning or just read about it later?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:. And there is a lot of risky behavior out there that happens to be connected to birth control. So there’s a whole other side to this conversation. And not once did I say should it be banned, or should it not be covered by health insurance. But I think it’s OK to have those beliefs or those concerns.

Along with stating her own views of “risky behavior” linked to birth control — a comment many are likely to notice — she also defended Santorum’s right to have his own personal beliefs and concerns.
well
maybe he will get many votes.
Sexual immorality that only applies to those that are hetero
Anonymous
14:39 here. Don't know what happened to OP. . .

I watch Morning Joe pretty religiously, and I don't think the clip posted by OP is a fair reflection of Mika's views. When the story about the HHS rules on insurance coverage for contraception broke last week, Mika defended the administration and argued for the importance of birth control access to women's health.

She also has two young teen/tween daughters, and her comments were in the context parenting. She never said she opposed contraception for teens. I think she only meant that parents need to talk to their children about sex, safety, and taking care of oneself.

She did defend Santorum's right to have his own beliefs and opinion about contraception, but she does not believe that it's okay for him to impose them on others in making public policy.

I like Mika a lot and have been really happy to see her be more vocal with her own opinions in the past year or so. If you watch her regularly, she's a good feminist and advocate for women.
Anonymous
There is a lot of risky behavior that is tied to the following things:

*Beer
*High school
*Youtube
*Cheerleading
*Music
*Driving
*Marriage
*College
*The beach
*Cell phones


Anonymous
She said what she said. Its a denial thing that many woman have. I talk to a lot of gynecologist. Their patients sometime talk politics of abortion, IVF, and contraception and where thing are heading. The women are like, you will still treat ME right Doc?? If the law changes, they ain't going to treat you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
She did defend Santorum's right to have his own beliefs and opinion about contraception, but she does not believe that it's okay for him to impose them on others in making public policy.


The guy is running for president-- unless he explicitly starts his sentence with "I would never act on this as president" (and maybe not even then) then I think you pretty much have to assume he is talking about what he would do as president.
Anonymous
WOmen will never admit to being sluts and whores and not worrying about the consequences because they're on the pill. Feminazis have ruined the real cause for female rights.
takoma
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:WOmen will never admit to being sluts and whores and not worrying about the consequences because they're on the pill. Feminazis have ruined the real cause for female rights.

If I might respectfully suggest it, those characterizations show more about your mindset than about those women.
TheManWithAUsername
Member Offline
takoma wrote:
Anonymous wrote:WOmen will never admit to being sluts and whores and not worrying about the consequences because they're on the pill. Feminazis have ruined the real cause for female rights.

If I might respectfully suggest it, those characterizations show more about your mindset than about those women.

I often wonder if you're just F-ing with the yahoos by being over-the-top polite with them.

Re risky behavior connected with birth control, I've noticed that there is a lot of risky behavior connected to life preservers, bullet-proof vests, and space suits.
Anonymous
when you take away a risk (pregnancy) you create a moral hazard. Birth control is a good thing and I completely support it to be used to not over populate but not as a way to condone promiscuity.
TheManWithAUsername
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:Birth control is a good thing and I completely support it to be used to not over populate but not as a way to condone promiscuity.

Can you cite anyone ever using BC "as a way to condone promiscuity?" I'm not sure I even understand what that would look/sound like.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The guy is running for president-- unless he explicitly starts his sentence with "I would never act on this as president" (and maybe not even then) then I think you pretty much have to assume he is talking about what he would do as president.


No no no. Santorum is NOT running for President. He is running for the Republican nomination in 2012 and doing a fine job of it by the way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:when you take away a risk (pregnancy) you create a moral hazard. Birth control is a good thing and I completely support it to be used to not over populate but not as a way to condone promiscuity.


Please go back to 1950.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
She did defend Santorum's right to have his own beliefs and opinion about contraception, but she does not believe that it's okay for him to impose them on others in making public policy.


The guy is running for president-- unless he explicitly starts his sentence with "I would never act on this as president" (and maybe not even then) then I think you pretty much have to assume he is talking about what he would do as president.


To clarify, she is no way supports Santorum's candidacy. She's a diehard Democrat and advocate of women's rights. She has often lamented the parade of ridiculous candidates in the Republican primary because she thinks it's important that elections promote thoughtful and serious conversations about the country's problems and policy and that voters are offered a clear choice. That conversation can't happen with Donald Trump, Herman Cain, Sarah Palin or any other ignorant/vanity candidate. Although extreme, Santorum is a legitimate candidate and his candidacy is having the desired effect (to the Democrats' advantage-- yippee!)

That's also why she's been really excited about the senate race between Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown. (She's a big Warren supporter.)

Not trying to be a Mika cheerleader or anything, but having watched her for so long and knowing about the books she's written for and about women succeeding professionally, I think it's really inaccurate (and unfair) to somehow suggest that she's anything other than a good advocate for women's rights.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: