Anonymous wrote:
This looks interesting. Does the website charge sellers to search?
Anonymous wrote:
You realize you are brokering without a license, right? There are all sorts of implications of risk with what you're doing. Someone will sue you eventually.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which site is yours?
+1 it seems like the pp is writing from zillow's perspective?
Anonymous wrote:Steve wrote:The DANGER report seems to indicate 3-5 years, but 14:36's guess of within 7.5 years seems more realistic. (https://www.dangerreport.com/)
When you combine the generations of a single method for an infrequent transaction with the large body of licensed salespersons out there, you can see why it's such an uphill battle.
I think we are the key to solving the current inefficiencies by turning the industry on its head since we let homeowners search for buyers, especially pre-market.
RedFin is just a cheaper brokerage.
Zillow can change the entire game tomorrow if they wanted to. Half or more of the buyers and sellers already use them.
You mean like Zillow's "make me move" pre-market listings?
Anonymous wrote:I am pre-qualified at my credit union but am realizing that I can probably do better with closing costs. They have an almost 5K origination fee, for starters!
Looking to borrow about 400K, and have excellent credit/good income/many existing assets.
Any ideas? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Steve wrote:In the $1m+ range we've been able to get some of our users 2.25% cash back, and they've all been pleased with the results.
Are you a brokerage? What are you? I don't understand.
Anonymous wrote:Steve wrote:Anonymous wrote:If my realtor fails to sell my house I'm going to de-list, wait a while, then post as a Make Me Move (using pictures other than the one my realtor took). I'll think put an asking price 6% less than it currently is and say "buyer's agent welcome: add buyer's agent commission to offer price." Has anyone done this?
You're probably better off leaving the price as is or only dropping 3% since buyers are programmed by agents to believe that sellers pay all of the commission.
You can also note that the price is $x lower without agents but the fact is that most people are represented thanks in part to what I mentioned above. If you don't offer commissions, buyer agents will may steer their clients away from your property since you may be keeping them from a pay check. If you lived in a hot area none of this would matter, but then again, you also wouldn't be worrying about de-listing.
If you choose to list with a phone number, use a Google Voice number so you can screen and easily block calls without fear of endless harassment. If you are harassed, you can just press "4" and Google gives out an audible alert saying, "This phone call is now being recorded."
Good luck and Happy Thanksgiving!
Thanks for the tips! Who would be harassing? Angry agents?
Anonymous wrote:If my realtor fails to sell my house I'm going to de-list, wait a while, then post as a Make Me Move (using pictures other than the one my realtor took). I'll think put an asking price 6% less than it currently is and say "buyer's agent welcome: add buyer's agent commission to offer price." Has anyone done this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't use a traditional realtor and save yourself $18k through reduced commissions.
Thanks but how? We have never sold a house before.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sellers don't read the letters, FYI, OP. We are in a close in suburb, and the sellers not once have read a letter. Don't waste your time.
The only thing you can do is offer above market rate - but then, wouldn't you buy a nicer house with that money????
Uh, a letter just won me a house over a developer. We offered $3K less and didn't waive any contingency. It happens. Some sellers do care what happens to their home after they leave.