Anonymous wrote:Cristol sounds like a nightmare.
She wants to put affordable housing on park land. NO WAY.
The other candidates said they don't think affordable housing should be built on parks, and that park land should be purchased and protected by the county. She's the only one who has said she doesn't think the county should have more parkland and that we should astroturf (?!) the parks we already have. UGH!
Anonymous wrote:From a special needs site:
A state complaint or resolution system considers violations of any state or federal education law. An example would be if a child’s IEP slated him to have speech 1 time a week and no speech was provided for 2 months then a state complaint should be filed.
A due process complaint considers the proposal or refusal to initiate or change the identification, evaluation or educational placement of a child with a disability, or the provision of FAPE to a child. An example would be If a child is placed in a center-based program or given a category of eligibility that the parent(s)/guardian(s) disagrees with, i.e. cognitive impairment, then a due process complaint would be the proper mechanism.
Anonymous wrote:Kyra,
What about state complaints? What can you tell us about how MCPS handles those and whether they result in any change?
Our school has a history of mishandling cases and filing may do a lot of other families some good. The stories we have heard a truly horrific.
Anonymous wrote:I think PP's point is that there are probably a lot of due process complaints that never make it to a hearing in which the parents get at least part of what they are seeking. So parents shouldn't be scared away from filing due to these statistics.
Anonymous wrote:Kyra-V wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the MSDE hearings list may be a bit misleading. Yes, if you actually wind up in court with MCPS, the statistics suggest that you will lose. However, in many cases, I think getting a lawyer and going to CIEP will get you what you want. If MCPS thinks that you have a reasonable chance, they will give in before it gets in front of a judge (and I'm sure there are no official statistics on this). I think they only take cases that far if they're pretty sure they're going to win, so what you're looking at on the MSDE site is a heavily cherry-picked sample with a lot of other factors playing in.
Yes, a huge number of cases resolve as part of the resolution process or at mediation. So filing a due process complaint and request for mediation is a good way to go. But no, I do not think the cases listed are cherry picked. Those are the real stats, at least with regard to cases that go before a judge. And they don't even include all the cases thrown out on motions (though some are included on the web site).
I didn't mean the cases themselves were cherry-picked. I believe those are all the cases that went to hearings before a judge. But I think the amount of disputes (general term) with MCPS that even turn into a legal "case" and a "hearing" is cherry-picked because MCPS doesn't let it get to a courtroom unless they're sure they'll win.
Anonymous wrote:I think the MSDE hearings list may be a bit misleading. Yes, if you actually wind up in court with MCPS, the statistics suggest that you will lose. However, in many cases, I think getting a lawyer and going to CIEP will get you what you want. If MCPS thinks that you have a reasonable chance, they will give in before it gets in front of a judge (and I'm sure there are no official statistics on this). I think they only take cases that far if they're pretty sure they're going to win, so what you're looking at on the MSDE site is a heavily cherry-picked sample with a lot of other factors playing in.
Anonymous wrote:Kyra-V wrote:Just be aware that parents very rarely win these cases.
Untrue.