Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THE POINT IS WE NEED TO GET THE MALE PERPS TO TESTIFY: TRUMP, BILL CLINTON, ACOSTA (who warned him off and what did he get out of it?), LUTNICK, AND ALL THE OTHERS.

WHAT SORT OF OPTICS IS IT TO DRAG THE WIVES INTO THIS BEFORE THEIR PERP HUSBANDS???

bill clinton is testifying today

This is excellent, because it ramps up the pressure for Trump et al to be deposed as well. If a former President can be interrogated, then so can others.

No, it's bad because it gets President Clinton on the record, saying, "I didn't do anything. I didn't know anything. I am innocent."

...that is, the exact same things President Trump is saying.

Did clinton draw an image of a prepupescent female for Epstein's birthday book? Did clinton refer to epstein as one of his best friends? Did clinton show up in the epstien files hundreds of thousands of times?

Exactly. There is no proof that Clinton and Epstein were in contact after his first charges, and I bet if there were any, Bondi would have been waving them about since last year! Trump, on the other hand, has some serious allegations of sexual abuse against him, both Epstein-facilitated and other stuff he did on his own, he has been CONVICTED OF RAPE, and there is a strong sense that not all Epstein file information has been released about him.

Trump himself has not been comfortable with Bill Clinton being deposed. He said as much, which, given his detestation of prior Democrat Presidents, is quite telling of his state of mind.

You add that all up and it stinks to high heaven for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a reason Hillary is doing this and not Bill.

I think they both need to talk to the committee, no?

Yes, they do.

Why is Hillary required to testify when she is not mentioned in the files? Should all the spouses of people mentioned in the files be called to testify? What is so special about Hillary that GOP always requires her to testify? And why should the sessions not be public?

Pizzagate. They literally asked her about it. I kid you not.
She wanted the session public, republicans refused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Lefkowitz be next to lose his job:

https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2026/02/04/after-law-school-adjunct-jay-lefkowitz-cc-84-law-87-reached-sweetheart-deal-for-epstein-he-maintained-a-personal-relationship-with-him/

OMG, that guy is gross. I understand all about a lawyer's duty to his client, but come on.

[Anonymous]

"I don't know anything about the Epstein files. I've been fully exonerated."

- Donald Trump

Now, if he didn't know anything about the Epstein Files (which is clearly a lie) then there wouldn't be anything he needed to be exonerated from (and he hasn't been exonerated from this by anybody)

[Anonymous]

analysis on how many time Hillary was mentioned and why - student reporters.

https://thewellesleynews.com/22903/news-investigation/what-the-epstein-files-actually-say-about-hillary-clinton-69/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I don't know anything about the Epstein files. I've been fully exonerated."

- Donald Trump

Now, if he didn't know anything about the Epstein Files (which is clearly a lie) then there wouldn't be anything he needed to be exonerated from (and he hasn't been exonerated from this by anybody)

What every convicted criminal says.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She looks like the Bride of Frankenstein. What nut job like that hair???

She has had a ton of plastic surgery as well as breast augmentation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:analysis on how many time Hillary was mentioned and why - student reporters.

https://thewellesleynews.com/22903/news-investigation/what-the-epstein-files-actually-say-about-hillary-clinton-69/

It would be nice if any Republicans besides Massie scrutinized their own as closely as Wellesley scrutinizes Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THE POINT IS WE NEED TO GET THE MALE PERPS TO TESTIFY: TRUMP, BILL CLINTON, ACOSTA (who warned him off and what did he get out of it?), LUTNICK, AND ALL THE OTHERS.

WHAT SORT OF OPTICS IS IT TO DRAG THE WIVES INTO THIS BEFORE THEIR PERP HUSBANDS???

bill clinton is testifying today

This is excellent, because it ramps up the pressure for Trump et al to be deposed as well. If a former President can be interrogated, then so can others.

No, it's bad because it gets President Clinton on the record, saying, "I didn't do anything. I didn't know anything. I am innocent."

...that is, the exact same things President Trump is saying.

Did clinton draw an image of a prepupescent female for Epstein's birthday book? Did clinton refer to epstein as one of his best friends? Did clinton show up in the epstien files hundreds of thousands of times?

Exactly. There is no proof that Clinton and Epstein were in contact after his first charges, and I bet if there were any, Bondi would have been waving them about since last year! Trump, on the other hand, has some serious allegations of sexual abuse against him, both Epstein-facilitated and other stuff he did on his own, he has been CONVICTED OF RAPE, and there is a strong sense that not all Epstein file information has been released about him.

Trump himself has not been comfortable with Bill Clinton being deposed. He said as much, which, given his detestation of prior Democrat Presidents, is quite telling of his state of mind.

You add that all up and it stinks to high heaven for Trump.

Epstein's painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress was done because...they weren't pals?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:analysis on how many time Hillary was mentioned and why - student reporters.

https://thewellesleynews.com/22903/news-investigation/what-the-epstein-files-actually-say-about-hillary-clinton-69/

It would be nice if any Republicans besides Massie scrutinized their own as closely as Wellesley scrutinizes Hillary.

Thank you Wellesley College students for a real article - they probably uncovered more than Congress will during testifying. Now if only they would interview a few Republicans on this matter instead of targeting Democrats who are no longer in power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bill Clinton’s opening statement

[Anonymous]

Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

[Anonymous]

Trump, who told Bondi to investigate the Clinton's knowledge of Epstein, now says that he is sorry to see Clinton being deposed. Dem members of the Oversight committee have asked Bill if he saw Trump with Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

And you're a Democrat who's trying really hard to reframe Bill Clinton's vile behavior and treatment of women, including his treatment of his wife. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

The accusation is a farce and was discredited by Biden’s FBI. I’m wondering where all you people screaming “release the files” were during Biden’s term. I searched for a thread on here with people insisting the files be released and I couldn’t find it. Hmmmm…..