Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

Yeah, in his letter, Freedman made clear he was relying on a credible anonymous source, not that he had personal knowledge. In any case, the silence from Team Taylor speaks volumes. She could rescue Blake at any point if this was a big misunderstanding.

The minute she speaks publicly on this, Freedom will claim she's a fact witness and must be deposed.

This whole thing is a plot to try and make her do that.

That's why you haven't heard a peep from Venable or Swift.

Everything you post is batshit and the authoritative tone is comical. You're on here legit 18 to 20 hours a day and you want us to believe you're a seasoned successful attorney? I hope this shilling is at least paying your rent, car note and groceries, otherwise... YIKES.

+1

You are both insane and you are confusing multiple posters again. Also, some crazy Baldoni supporter was on here yesterday (before this news broke) constantly refreshing the thread and posting responses to comments almost immediately, and calling the person they were responding to obsessive, lol! Pots and kettles etc.

[Anonymous]

^ and to repeat what the above poster said, you’re clearly not a lawyer or litigator as you claim sometimes claim. You use language and make illogical leaps that a lawyer just wouldn’t make.

But you go on claiming whatever it is you think you’re doing on here.

[Anonymous]

Also? Which one of you losers posted the thread yesterday about PR firms and celebrity lawyers hanging out on DCUM? lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also? Which one of you losers posted the thread yesterday about PR firms and celebrity lawyers hanging out on DCUM? lol

Who are you calling a loser?

What post? The thread about PR? No one said celebrity lawyers were hanging out here, but this is the typical twisting of facts that we’ve grown accustomed to seeing. And many people agreed that celebrities and others use reputation management trackers and pay others to engage for them for PR purposes. Your efforts to attack and deny this happens are transparent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

Freedman is a show boat as a number of lawyers in that world are, but there was nothing ‘out there’ about that letter if it is based on a credible source. No word at all so far that it wasn’t.

And the far more ‘out there’ move was filing a sham lawsuit against doe parties to deprive people of due process. That’s the move that lawyers across the board agree was highly unethical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

Yeah, in his letter, Freedman made clear he was relying on a credible anonymous source, not that he had personal knowledge. In any case, the silence from Team Taylor speaks volumes. She could rescue Blake at any point if this was a big misunderstanding.

The minute she speaks publicly on this, Freedom will claim she's a fact witness and must be deposed.

This whole thing is a plot to try and make her do that.

That's why you haven't heard a peep from Venable or Swift.

Everything you post is batshit and the authoritative tone is comical. You're on here legit 18 to 20 hours a day and you want us to believe you're a seasoned successful attorney? I hope this shilling is at least paying your rent, car note and groceries, otherwise... YIKES.

+1

You are both insane and you are confusing multiple posters again. Also, some crazy Baldoni supporter was on here yesterday (before this news broke) constantly refreshing the thread and posting responses to comments almost immediately, and calling the person they were responding to obsessive, lol! Pots and kettles etc.

I haven’t seen any ‘crazy’ Baldoni supporters on here. Where?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

Freedman is a show boat as a number of lawyers in that world are, but there was nothing ‘out there’ about that letter if it is based on a credible source. No word at all so far that it wasn’t.

And the far more ‘out there’ move was filing a sham lawsuit against doe parties to deprive people of due process. That’s the move that lawyers across the board agree was highly unethical.

He is accusing a very respected attorney with no history of ethical problems of:

1) trying to extort a witness,
2) who happens to be one of the most famous women in the world,
3) by sending the threat to her attorney, also a very well respected attorney with no history of ethical issues,
4) via email!
5) in order to obtain ... a public statement of support? Not evidence it witness testimony, but a press release?

That letter is INSANE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

Right. I am a DP from above, I’m the PO the Baldoni supporter was talking to, and I also dislike Freedman, but I am one of two or three different posters on here who have questioned his antics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

Freedman is a show boat as a number of lawyers in that world are, but there was nothing ‘out there’ about that letter if it is based on a credible source. No word at all so far that it wasn’t.

And the far more ‘out there’ move was filing a sham lawsuit against doe parties to deprive people of due process. That’s the move that lawyers across the board agree was highly unethical.

He is accusing a very respected attorney with no history of ethical problems of:

1) trying to extort a witness,
2) who happens to be one of the most famous women in the world,
3) by sending the threat to her attorney, also a very well respected attorney with no history of ethical issues,
4) via email!
5) in order to obtain ... a public statement of support? Not evidence it witness testimony, but a press release?

That letter is INSANE.

But what if all those things are true?

[Anonymous]

The judge granted in part Blaked motion to have Wayfarer and justin produce financial documents. The tax returns were denied. Was this posted yet?

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.216.0.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge granted in part Blaked motion to have Wayfarer and justin produce financial documents. The tax returns were denied. Was this posted yet?

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.216.0.pdf

Yes. It just got buried. Go back q few pages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally one of the worse days for Blake since the lawsuit was filed and the Lively supporter is screaming about how can any support Freedman. It’s funny.

That’s not what I’m saying at all and you know it. If he’s not lying, you all have been basically right all along. But if what he is saying is NOT true, why won’t anyone here adjust their opinions because of that? If his information is wrong and he just spread lies via a signed letter on the court docket, why wouldn’t you change your opinion of him?

The irony of this stuns me. It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.

You are so weirdly paranoid. I don’t have inside info. I’m not at the center of this thing lol. I’m an arlington mom!!!

I have said above that I have been defending Lively but that if Lively asked Swift to delete messages or if Gottlieb tried to extort a public statement of support from Swift in clear exchange for sensitive info not getting released that would hurt Swift, I would be done supporting Lively.

And what I do not understand is why any Baldoni people are not saying that if Freedman is all wrong about this, they would stop supporting him. I guess I can see they wouldn’t stop supporting Baldoni. But I would think that if Freedman were going to wrongly accuse Lively’s lead attorney of extortion in a public filing to the judge that he signed, why would you still support Freedman? Seems like such dishonesty and willingness to air out false accusations against counsel on the docket to the judge (if false) should change your opinion of him, at least.

Gottlieb is a well known and respected lawyer. In the last few years, he tried a case in front of Liman, I believe pro bono, where he represented poll workers who were defamed by Rudy Giuliani, and he won. This is the lawyer Freedman is putting his unverified speculation re extortion to the judge about. I find it hard to believe, but like I said, if it’s true, I’m out. But if it’s not true, why on earth would you still be on Team Freedman?

Who said I was talking to you? Anyway, I assume you’re the one who writes long diatribes about freedman and your hatred of him and gloating over minor issues like the PO?? Is that you?

Most people don’t care so much about the lawyers but if we are going to talk about questionable moves, Blake’s legal side has many more of them at this point. I personally don’t think Freedman would totally lie here, and I also don’t think DM would run this without some back up, but either way, I’m not as obsessed with freedman as you are.

Um, you did?! You responded to my comment and said “It’s almost like someone on the BL side is trying to set up freedman to make a huge mistake so they can undermine Baldonis entire case and defense. This poster is so adamant that if freedman is wrong, everyone should also hate Baldoni.”

I understood those two statements to have some logical connection — you were saying that the same person on Lively’s side had set Freedman up to make a huge mistake and then coming here to say if Freedman was wrong, you should desert Baldoni.

If there was no logical connection between the statements, you are just writing indeterminate word salad and shouldn’t be surprised when it confuses people.

So answer my questions. Are you the freedman obsessed poster or not? Again, most people don’t care much for the lawyers but you seem to be obsessed with trying to bash Freedman, while ignoring that BL’s legal team has done some verifiably unethical stuff. You’ve been bashing Freedman for weeks, desperate to have people view him as not credible.

DP but I think you are conflating multiple posters because I think Freedman is a sleaze and have posted things to that effect, but I'm not the poster you're replying to.

Freedman is pretty out there. I've never seen something like the letter he filed yesterday. I think if you pulled a room of 100 lawyers on that letter, his Madison Square Garden statement, and this timeline exhibit he filed, you'd get a third saying it's all fine, a third saying it's crazy but hey lawyering is about zealous advocacy so don't hate the player, and a third who thinks he doesn't deserve to have a legal license. I sit right in the edge of the second and third groups. I know I'm not alone.

Freedman is a show boat as a number of lawyers in that world are, but there was nothing ‘out there’ about that letter if it is based on a credible source. No word at all so far that it wasn’t.

And the far more ‘out there’ move was filing a sham lawsuit against doe parties to deprive people of due process. That’s the move that lawyers across the board agree was highly unethical.

He is accusing a very respected attorney with no history of ethical problems of:

1) trying to extort a witness,
2) who happens to be one of the most famous women in the world,
3) by sending the threat to her attorney, also a very well respected attorney with no history of ethical issues,
4) via email!
5) in order to obtain ... a public statement of support? Not evidence it witness testimony, but a press release?

That letter is INSANE.

And you are accusing a respected lawyer- you may not like Freedman but he’s a decent lawyer- of wholesale making up a *fake source* to make claims he filed in court.

Of course it’s possible he got duped by a source but I highly doubt he’s making it up. There’s something there.

And I’ll remind, Gottlieb is on the side of a client who filed a sham lawsuit to deprive multiple parties of due process, and who used the NYT to tank the careers of multiple people (including the NYT journalist whose career is likely wrecked).

But yeah, freedman is the bad guy here. Got it

[Anonymous]

Bryan Freedman filing standing behind the allegations in his letter and now filing a sworn affidavit:

Opposition to motion to strike: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.219.0.pdf

Sworn affidavit: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.219.1.pdf

wut? this just keeps getting more crazy.

[Anonymous]

So now Gottlieb needs to file an affidavit I guess. Did Gottlieb demand a statement of support from Swift for not appearing at the Super Bowl, and if not granted, Lively would release “ten years” of private texts with Swift? Or anything really close to that?

If this is true or mostly true, Lively will lose lots of support, including me. Freedman is filing a sworn affidavit, so unless he’s being punk’s, which also seems possible (what steps did he take to confirm the person was who they said they were??), this seems very bad for Lively.