Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

Anonymous
I think there's evidence that Kane was controlling. Remember when Nat got a chance to be on a soap? She was so excited but he didn't like the thought of her kissing other people, even for work, so she didn't do it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait, are people saying they don't think the court record existed or are you saying you think it was put up there as a prank and then taken down?? Because it was definitely up there... I have been reading this thread and have yet to comment but i can't keep my mouth shut about this one. Saw with my own eyes. Listed their full address so I'm sure thats why Kane got it taken down. Probably knows someone there who did a favor for him.


It's just 1 person and he/she is basically saying the court record doesn't exist and that this is all a radio bit.


I saw it the day this thread started. I looked it up in the morning. It was gone by the evening. But all he had to do was file this and it's shielded from public view.

http://www.courts.state.md.us/courtforms/joint/ccdc052.pdf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If anyone listened today, did Kane say why he was in FL and not in MD? Is he in FL all week?


Yes, he is there all week. The trip was planned before the Friday show (although maybe he planned it knowing he was going to announce on Friday?) Either way, they had been talking about it for at least a few days.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think there's evidence that Kane was controlling. Remember when Nat got a chance to be on a soap? She was so excited but he didn't like the thought of her kissing other people, even for work, so she didn't do it.


I don't know that that's necessarily evidence of 'controlling.' TBH if my husband was gonna be kissing other folk, even for TV, I would not like that either. But I guess maybe if it was one episode I might be okay with it, but...still. =\ It would make me really uncomfortable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think there's evidence that Kane was controlling. Remember when Nat got a chance to be on a soap? She was so excited but he didn't like the thought of her kissing other people, even for work, so she didn't do it.


I don't know that that's necessarily evidence of 'controlling.' TBH if my husband was gonna be kissing other folk, even for TV, I would not like that either. But I guess maybe if it was one episode I might be okay with it, but...still. =\ It would make me really uncomfortable.


But Nat had to deal with Kane partying for work, being around beautiful women (singers etc), etc.
Anonymous
I read a comment from Natasha's mom/sis (? bio.luminesce/becksanne95 I think?) somewhere on Natasha's Instagram coffee mug pic that Kane filed for divorce on Natasha's bday. If that's true - then ouch!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I read a comment from Natasha's mom/sis (? bio.luminesce/becksanne95 I think?) somewhere on Natasha's Instagram coffee mug pic that Kane filed for divorce on Natasha's bday. If that's true - then ouch!


Her bday is may 27 (I think? From what I've read on this timeline), and he filed June 4. I think it's possible he told her on her bday he was gonna file for divorce.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think there's evidence that Kane was controlling. Remember when Nat got a chance to be on a soap? She was so excited but he didn't like the thought of her kissing other people, even for work, so she didn't do it.


I don't know that that's necessarily evidence of 'controlling.' TBH if my husband was gonna be kissing other folk, even for TV, I would not like that either. But I guess maybe if it was one episode I might be okay with it, but...still. =\ It would make me really uncomfortable.


But Nat had to deal with Kane partying for work, being around beautiful women (singers etc), etc.


That's true. But I don't think he kissed any of them, lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I read a comment from Natasha's mom/sis (? bio.luminesce/becksanne95 I think?) somewhere on Natasha's Instagram coffee mug pic that Kane filed for divorce on Natasha's bday. If that's true - then ouch!


Her bday is may 27 (I think? From what I've read on this timeline), and he filed June 4. I think it's possible he told her on her bday he was gonna file for divorce.


I've read time and time again that he told her on her birthday that he was filing for divorce. Ouch indeed, but if she did all the stuff he says she did - it was kind of justified, if a little catty.
Anonymous
Did anyone listen this morning to Kane fawning over Danni for pumping in the studio...gushing over her being a "working mother"? LOL
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are no screenshots. There were no public court postings. This divorce thing is a radio bit. Staged. An act, like Roses, like the Kane Scams. The social media accounts on which all of this has unfolded are also an act. Those of you who don't see this are a bunch of rubes, suckers, marks. You're engaging in parasocial interactions with a bunch of phony radio carnys that you think you really know.


Keep dreaming on the court thing.....I saw the divorce listing myself before it was pulled early afternoon on Friday.


Divorce proceedings are not listed. They are protected by Maryland rules of court access. The link to the website and text from the website is pasted below.


Divorce proceedings are listed when they are filed. I know first hand. With that one statement you proved you know nothing.
Also helps that many of us saw it
Anonymous
All of you people talking about court records and real estate and tickets.... what is wrong with you? Do these people not deserve privacy? How odd and obsessive do you have to be to look up online court filings or real estate or motor vehicle records for a DJ and his wife? You're sick. This reminds me of what happened when Don Geronimo's wife was killed in an auto accident, it brought so many sicko, unhinged 'real fans' out of the woodwork. Life your life, you do NOT know the real 'Kane' or his spouse or any of these people. Do NOT play detective because you think your weird, sad parasocial fixation you have on this man gives you the right or feel the need to know more. If you've done any of these things I just wrote about, please take a deep breath and ask yourself what you're doing with your time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All of you people talking about court records and real estate and tickets.... what is wrong with you? Do these people not deserve privacy? How odd and obsessive do you have to be to look up online court filings or real estate or motor vehicle records for a DJ and his wife? You're sick. This reminds me of what happened when Don Geronimo's wife was killed in an auto accident, it brought so many sicko, unhinged 'real fans' out of the woodwork. Life your life, you do NOT know the real 'Kane' or his spouse or any of these people. Do NOT play detective because you think your weird, sad parasocial fixation you have on this man gives you the right or feel the need to know more. If you've done any of these things I just wrote about, please take a deep breath and ask yourself what you're doing with your time.


I think you need a deep breath yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How do people know kane took out a 1.4M mortgage?


Cuz people know his real name, and property records are public records. <_< Also Natasha posted pictures of the house, and several people posted the Zillow page for it that showed the last sale price and date.


I think the PP may have meant how do we know he took out a 1.4mil mortgage and didn't pay cash?

Its still public record aypt mdlandrec.net
Anonymous
Can you idiots please stop saying "Kane". Just say Natasha, Nat, or N, and refer to him by either Peter, Pete, or P. It's so stupid that he has this "alias" name, what other radio DJ does that?

Elliot Segal doesn't. Howard Stern doesn't, Ryan Seacrest doesn't. It's so childish.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: