New Epstein thread on current charges on other powerful people that got caught in his web

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"In any case, I am unaware of any democrat who will defend his association with Epstein. Republicans will support trump no matter what he did to little girls."
We know Democrats didn't care about this story and actively ignored it, until they thought Trump was involved. The media sees its mission as covering up facts that are inconvenient to Democrats.

You gotta admit the story became pretty newsworthy after Trump and Barr had Epstein murdered to keep him quiet.

They want to keep that quiet.

Just like how Trump’s name is only anonymized because he’s probably using every single tactic to delay his rape of a child charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"In any case, I am unaware of any democrat who will defend his association with Epstein. Republicans will support trump no matter what he did to little girls."
We know Democrats didn't care about this story and actively ignored it, until they thought Trump was involved. The media sees its mission as covering up facts that are inconvenient to Democrats.

You gotta admit the story became pretty newsworthy after Trump and Barr had Epstein murdered to keep him quiet.

They want to keep that quiet.

Just like how Trump’s name is only anonymized because he’s probably using every single tactic to delay his rape of a child charges.

Good grief. You simply cannot admit that there is ZERO evidence that Trump had any involvement here.
Clinton, however..........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Magas are absolutely beaming today because Trump has not exactly been implicated…yet. The bar could not be any lower. The bar is literally on the floor. If you are planning to vote for someone for President of the United States, and you find yourself to be relieved and proud that he is not proven to be a child rapist (this particular time), you need to RAISE YOUR DANG BAR! Especially since he has already been proven to be a sexual predator, cheater, etc. There’s footage of him with Epstein, groping a young lady and pulling her towards him.

Yes, I am a democrat. Yes, I anticipate seeing democrats on the list. No, I will NEVER vote for anyone associated with Epstein. It’s the very least I can do as a responsible US citizen. The. Very. Least.

Raise your standards.

Newsflash..... Trump will not be implicated as much as you wish he would be.
He has no love of Epstein. He banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after Epstein tried to hit on an underage daughter of a client.
Clinton, OTOH.... lots of photos of him with some of Epstein's underage victims.

Newsflash…I do not hope for Trump to be implicated. Every guilty person=more abuse, which is the most significant aspect of this story. Not politics. If Clinton ran for office again, I would not vote for him. Again, raise your bar. Expect excellence.

Thanks for proving my point. The bar is actually below the floor. The bar hit groundwater.

[Anonymous]

Even if there was glaring evidence Trump engaged in scandal on the island, I seriously doubt that would change anything. His supporters would just rationalize it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"In any case, I am unaware of any democrat who will defend his association with Epstein. Republicans will support trump no matter what he did to little girls."
We know Democrats didn't care about this story and actively ignored it, until they thought Trump was involved. The media sees its mission as covering up facts that are inconvenient to Democrats.

You gotta admit the story became pretty newsworthy after Trump and Barr had Epstein murdered to keep him quiet.

They want to keep that quiet.

Just like how Trump’s name is only anonymized because he’s probably using every single tactic to delay his rape of a child charges.

Good grief. You simply cannot admit that there is ZERO evidence that Trump had any involvement here.
Clinton, however..........

Since when do republicans care about evidence? Lots of people are saying it….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even if there was glaring evidence Trump engaged in scandal on the island, I seriously doubt that would change anything. His supporters would just rationalize it.

Anybody got any evidence that Trump ever flew to Epstein’s Island?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if there was glaring evidence Trump engaged in scandal on the island, I seriously doubt that would change anything. His supporters would just rationalize it.

Anybody got any evidence that Trump ever flew to Epstein’s Island?

Anybody got any evidence that the Jan. 6 committee deleted all the evidence they used to write their report?

[Anonymous]

This is so hilarious Dems think this is a 'gotcha' for Trump. Trump appears in the list 4 times, which is almost the same as ::drumroll:: celebrities like Tony Hawk. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton appears over 70+ times and one survivor of the abuse already is quoted as saying"Clinton liked 'em young".

Clinton goes along with sick liberal Democrats in Hollyweird throughout the decades who abused kids and are pedos. There is something sick in liberal Democrats' brains.

[Anonymous]

Clinton likes ‘em young. - Jeffrey Epstein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so hilarious Dems think this is a 'gotcha' for Trump. Trump appears in the list 4 times, which is almost the same as ::drumroll:: celebrities like Tony Hawk. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton appears over 70+ times and one survivor of the abuse already is quoted as saying"Clinton liked 'em young".

Clinton goes along with sick liberal Democrats in Hollyweird throughout the decades who abused kids and are pedos. There is something sick in liberal Democrats' brains.

Of course this isn't a good look at all for Clinton, but he isn't running for President. He hasn't been President for 23 years. Trump is running. But the reality is that Trump has SO much baggage, that this isn't even a blip. In the scheme of things, this story falls well behind his bad smell and dirty diapers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if there was glaring evidence Trump engaged in scandal on the island, I seriously doubt that would change anything. His supporters would just rationalize it.

Anybody got any evidence that Trump ever flew to Epstein’s Island?

Anybody got any evidence that the Jan. 6 committee deleted all the evidence they used to write their report?

So nobody has an evidence that shows or proves Trump went to Lolita Island, and you are deflecting by posting about Jan 6th? If you can’t tell the truth about this, nobody should believe you about anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if there was glaring evidence Trump engaged in scandal on the island, I seriously doubt that would change anything. His supporters would just rationalize it.

Anybody got any evidence that Trump ever flew to Epstein’s Island?

Anybody got any evidence that the Jan. 6 committee deleted all the evidence they used to write their report?

So nobody has an evidence that shows or proves Trump went to Lolita Island, and you are deflecting by posting about Jan 6th? If you can’t tell the truth about this, nobody should believe you about anything else.

So you don't have any evidence that the Jan. 6 committee deleted all of their evidence, as alleged by Trump? If he can't tell the truth about that, nobody should believe him about anything else.

[Anonymous]

We’ll never get the real list because Clinton had Epstein murdered. Now we know why…50 different trios or meetups with Epstein. That and the fact he stayed Bill “liked then young” we know why he was murdered.

I’m interested to see the Bill Gates connection too. I’m sure there is others and their names should be released.

[Anonymous]

VIA ECF
The Honorable Loretta A. Preska
District Court Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP

Dear Judge Preska,
Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with
Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents
ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until completed. This filing also excludes
documents pertaining to Does 105 (see December 28, 2023, Email Correspondence with
Chambers), 107, and 110 (see ECF No. 1319), while the Court’s review of those documents is
ongoing.
Respectfully,
/s/ Sigrid S. McCawley
Sigrid S. McCawley
cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)

SOURCE https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24253239/1324-epstein-documents-943-pages.pdf

PAGE 112

BY MS. MENNINGER:

17 Q. Donald Trump?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Did you ever massage Donald Trump?
20 A. No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so hilarious Dems think this is a 'gotcha' for Trump. Trump appears in the list 4 times, which is almost the same as ::drumroll:: celebrities like Tony Hawk. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton appears over 70+ times and one survivor of the abuse already is quoted as saying"Clinton liked 'em young".

Clinton goes along with sick liberal Democrats in Hollyweird throughout the decades who abused kids and are pedos. There is something sick in liberal Democrats' brains.

and the times Trump was mentioned he was shown he never met or got involved.

But we do know Clinton “liked them young”