New Epstein thread on current charges on other powerful people that got caught in his web

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why have more girls not come out against the others that have abused them? We are focusing on those accusing Epstein, but why aren't we pushing to get the other abusers named by victims as well?


Who says they haven't?
Evidently, after the presser a couple of weeks ago, they heard from more women.
Do you think they are going to announce who else they are investigating? Is this something that NEEDS to be in the press at this time?
Anonymous
I don't care who Dershowitz voted for or supports. He's a sanctimonious prick, and I'd experience a great deal of schadenfreude watching him take a fall for being a pedophile.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I bet some of the blackmail money to Epstein came from the British royal family. They'd do anything to keep Prince Andrew out of this.

I just cannot understand that mindset, if true (and it seems likely), to protect one’s pedophile child rather than protecting children from pedophiles. Do they think it’s exaggerated? Made up? Not that bad if the girl was x?


There are a lot of conspiracy theories around the royals. I'm beginning to think many are true . . .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The elephant in the room is that the wildly successful/powerful/rich/etc get ahead by being indifferent to others. There’s massively more rot all around than DCUM’s monomaniacal obsession with Trump assumes and I’d be very glad if ANYONE guilty of this stuff is caught. All of you should also be glad instead of making up these weird stories about coverups, which sound as stupid as pizzagate!


I think most of us who are “obsessing” over Trump’s involvement agree that ANYONE who is guilty needs to be caught. The focus on Trump is due to the fact that HE IS CURRENTLY THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD!


The publicly available evidence of his involvement is probably the weakest of all public figures so far identified. Given that we’ve seen years of lurid accusations against Trump that are always walked backed, it looks like TDS is still alive and well.

Now, hiring under the table Polish laborers and having them deported before paying them seems more much likely, but strangely less discussed.
Anonymous
He will stay in jail - bail denied.

Thoughts and Prayers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He will stay in jail - bail denied.

Thoughts and Prayers.


Good. I don't know anyone (other than Epstein and his attorneys) who didn't want this decision.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why have more girls not come out against the others that have abused them? We are focusing on those accusing Epstein, but why aren't we pushing to get the other abusers named by victims as well?


There have been, but it's in everyone's best interest for those cases to be investigated before names are made public. The FBI has his tapes. I'm sure they are spending time identifying women and men on the tapes before either pressing charges (if allowed to proceed). In fact, I'm sure that's why they put the call out for women to call in to the FBI. There are probably dozens of different underage girls, now women on those tapes. There are only a handful of women that have gone public. They need to figure out who they are looking at.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I bet some of the blackmail money to Epstein came from the British royal family. They'd do anything to keep Prince Andrew out of this.

I just cannot understand that mindset, if true (and it seems likely), to protect one’s pedophile child rather than protecting children from pedophiles. Do they think it’s exaggerated? Made up? Not that bad if the girl was x?


It would do epic harm to the royal family as an institution, which is the bigger issue.

Queen Elizabeth has worked her entire life for “the Firm.” No, they will not sacrifice what they have for teenage girls.

If he is guilty and gets exposed, it is going to be so much worse for them. So so much worse. I read a lot of royal gossip, so I know about the queen’s devotion to her job, but good god - cut him off and cut him out. If he gets exposed, it might end the royal family (as I understand that fully 50% of British people don’t support the monarchy).


My theory is they can’t control how much information about this would come out so they would prefer it be none at all. If Andrew is a pedophile, it would mean that they have already known and covered it up for decades. And they have enough power and money to still believe that they can control this.

Exactly. It's like the cover up by the Catholic Church in their pedophile scandals.
Anonymous
one of the contractors comes clean . . .

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/former-contractor-jeffrey-epstein-says-quit-over-concerns-041500056--abc-news-topstories.html
Former IT contractor for Jeffrey Epstein says he quit over concerns about revealing pictures and topless young women

A former IT contractor for Jeffrey Epstein who said that he ended their business relationship over personal concerns about gaggles of apparently unsupervised young women on the embattled financier's private island told ABC News that his reluctance to continue working there was underscored by what he said was an extensive collection of photos of topless women displayed throughout the island's compounds.

“There were photos of topless women everywhere," said contractor Steve Scully, who said he worked for Epstein for six years beginning in 1999. "On his desk, in his office, in his bedroom,” Scully, a 69-year-old father of three girls, said of the private island dubbed "Little St. James."


makes me wonder how this went on for such a long time
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The elephant in the room is that the wildly successful/powerful/rich/etc get ahead by being indifferent to others. There’s massively more rot all around than DCUM’s monomaniacal obsession with Trump assumes and I’d be very glad if ANYONE guilty of this stuff is caught. All of you should also be glad instead of making up these weird stories about coverups, which sound as stupid as pizzagate!


I think most of us who are “obsessing” over Trump’s involvement agree that ANYONE who is guilty needs to be caught. The focus on Trump is due to the fact that HE IS CURRENTLY THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD!


The publicly available evidence of his involvement is probably the weakest of all public figures so far identified. Given that we’ve seen years of lurid accusations against Trump that are always walked backed, it looks like TDS is still alive and well.

Now, hiring under the table Polish laborers and having them deported before paying them seems more much likely, but strangely less discussed.

Hot take, trumpster.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He will stay in jail - bail denied.

Thoughts and Prayers.

Good! That’s where the criminal belongs!
Anonymous
Interesting that the IT guy said Epstein had nude pictures all over his walls of his island home. Here is a 25 minute documentary made in November 2018 that shows a lot of pictures I have not seen before. Footage of the local police search warrant of his Palm Beach is interspersed. He has nudes on every available wall. And terrible taste. You would thin he could hire a decorator. This seems to have some connection with RT so view with a critical eye: https://youtu.be/spkcvkgsoIg
Anonymous
Alan Dershowitz: I had a "perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time"
<SHUDDER>
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1152048480594137090?s=21
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Alan Dershowitz: I had a "perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time"
<SHUDDER>
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1152048480594137090?s=21


Dershowitz said he had sex with just one woman -- carefully dodging the fact that the accusations surrounding Epstein and his supporters have to do with girls, not women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Alan Dershowitz: I had a "perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time"
<SHUDDER>
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1152048480594137090?s=21


Dershowitz said he had sex with just one woman -- carefully dodging the fact that the accusations surrounding Epstein and his supporters have to do with girls, not women.


"Relevent period of time" is quite the qualifier.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: