Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having a current SS agent who was formerly helping to overthrow the government, seems problematic.

That's why he's now in charge of D&I training

What does that mean?

That's where they put him when he burrowed back into the Secret Service. They couldn't risk him on a detail.

Apparently he was still secret service while he worked for Trump?
How the F is that allowed?
What happens when someone tries this crap again?
What has changed? Talk about Fing grooming. Trump pulls
A few bozos out of the ranks and starts stress testing the weak spots.
Seeing how far he can push them. How loyal they will be.
And everyone just kinda shrugs….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having a current SS agent who was formerly helping to overthrow the government, seems problematic.

That's why he's now in charge of D&I training

What does that mean?

That's where they put him when he burrowed back into the Secret Service. They couldn't risk him on a detail.

Not sure if related, but recall that when Biden first got a USSS detail as the nominee he wasn’t comfortable with them and switched teams so there were more agents with him who had been with him when he was VP. This was right before January 6.
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/31/joe-biden-secret-service-team-trump-loyalty

[Anonymous]

One of the things that stood out to me - Republican people said how respectful the Trumps were to "the help". Not like the Dems, who made them wait (USSS). and "the help" liked the Trumps bc of this respect.

Yet - flinging food across the room? Breaking dishes? Food on the walls? That doesn't seem very respectful.

The first thing I thought - who the heck is cleaning up his mess? Someone who is used to not getting his hands dirty.

Where is the baby Donald balloon when you need it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having a current SS agent who was formerly helping to overthrow the government, seems problematic.

That's why he's now in charge of D&I training

What does that mean?

That's where they put him when he burrowed back into the Secret Service. They couldn't risk him on a detail.

Apparently he was still secret service while he worked for Trump?
How the F is that allowed?
What happens when someone tries this crap again?
What has changed? Talk about Fing grooming. Trump pulls
A few bozos out of the ranks and starts stress testing the weak spots.
Seeing how far he can push them. How loyal they will be.
And everyone just kinda shrugs….

It is something dictators do. They take people who are at the bottom of the abilities and promote for loyalty. These people know their jobs are totally dependent on the dictator and will do anything to stay in the position.

[Anonymous]

Trump attempted a violent coup. I'm glad he failed. Trivia about him throwing ketchup or being mad at his driver is pretty secondary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump attempted a violent coup. I'm glad he failed. Trivia about him throwing ketchup or being mad at his driver is pretty secondary.

Yes, it’s secondary but it proves that people were lying about Trump, as a pp said, he wasn’t respectful or kind and it also proves what a trash human he was anyway. Who tf throws temper tantrums like that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Alyssa Farah also said Ornato lied about something said to her. Before the assault on protesters in Farragut Square she asked Meadows and Ornato if they could warn the press just before the action so they could get out of harm’s way. Meadows of course said no way. When it was investigated later Farah told the story and Ornato refuted her and said that meeting never happened.

Let's apply the same standard to EVERYONE: if you're not testifying under oath, your anecdotes are worthless. Why is Farah not talking to the Committee?

She has. Keep up with what's going on.

[Anonymous]

Liz Cheney at the Reagan Presidential Library:

Donald Trump attempted to overturn the presidential election. He attempted to stay in office and to prevent the peaceful transfer of presidential power. He summoned a mob to Washington, He knew they were armed on January 6th. He knew they were angry. And he directed the violent mob to march on the Capitol in order to delay or prevent completely the counting of electoral votes. He attempted to go there with them. And when the violence was underway, he refused to take action to tell the rioters to leave. Instead, he incited further violence by tweeting that the vice president, Mike Pence, was a coward. He said 'Mike deserves it,' and he didn't want to do anything in response to the 'Hang Mike Pence' chants. It's undeniable.
...
The reality that we face today as Republicans, as we think about the choice in front of us, we have to choose because Republicans cannot both be loyal to Donald Trump and loyal to the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Justin Clark, Jim Clark... what difference does it make anyway?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Justin Clark, Jim Clark... what difference does it make anyway?

What?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Devastating…how will Fox News recover?

[Anonymous]

So for all of those posters who said she was lying and thus her full testimony should be discounted, are you going to stop watching Fox and Newmax and come back to earth, rather than earth prime?

[Anonymous]

and another

https://twitter.com/hunterw/status/1542946668794023936

[Anonymous]

trying again...