| Different poster here and I get that Davidson is charming and lovely (I thought so when we visited) but most Americans have not heard of it---including many educated Americans who will be someday hiring your child. In contrast Notre Dame and Georgetown are household names. I don't think this is a cut and dry decision. |
I get your point. But just want to say that I don’t think being a “household name” is a good metric. Ole Miss and Ohio state are well known “household names” but that doesn’t make them the most prestigious schools. |
Not to mention Davidson is really small, many kids aren’t looking for slacs. Georgetown and Notre Dams are both in the so-called unicorn size range, 5000 to 10000. |
Good lord. There are a lot more kids at both ND and Georgetown. That means that the percentage of athletes to applicants is diluted and thus it has less of an impact on average standardized test scores. I'm guessing you didn't score too highly, dear. |
Clearly, this applicant is looking at SLACs which is why they are on the list. Just another illogical SLAC hater. Please read before posting. |
Says who? Many go to SLACs. |
|
ND from that list. But I don’t know enough about LSE undergrad.
I think Georgetown SFS is special, but not worth the extra money over ND. |
It’s just a stupid argument — about half the class at Davidson doesn’t submit test scores at all, this presumably includes the athletes you are trying to claim bring thr test scores down. |
A very small percentage compared to the number of kids at universities. It’s just basic math. |
| Rankings and "brand" are important criteria. But honestly, no less important are culture and setting. We have three kids in highly selective schools. In hindsight, the #1 most important criteria we wish we had emphasized for them was -- what kind of place is most likely to make you intellectually curious, happy, and healthy? This is not always obvious when high school seniors are making their choices. The clearest example from our experience is geography. For our crew, it's CLEARLY better to spend four years in a place that you enjoy, rather than four years in a (higher-ranked, better known) place that you do not. For one of our kids, cold dark winters were just not a good thing. The second example is the student body mindset. It's CLEARLY better to spend four years in a collaborative environment, than four years in a (higher-ranked, better known) endless competitive pressure cooker. Don't underestimate how much mental health is a thing at their age. Anyway, to each their own, but that's our experience. Luckily we have a fourth kid in high school and can try to help him get it right. |
Actually, it’s #16 for undergrad teaching. And that’s liberal arts colleges, not universities. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges |
There are more larger schools on the list. Personally know too many kids at s who are bored with the social scene by year three. |
There is no such list on Niche |
Aren’t you tired yet? I have a hs junior and can’t even w all this. |
|
Sigh. I regret entering this rankings arms race. Here's the link showing Davidson as the current #6 USNWR for undergrad teaching. Yes, you are right, it appears to be for LACs. Good catch.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching Peace out. |