You need to go way back to talk about it being a commuter school. Same with Boston College. I don’t know why people need to compare the schools. There are schools all over the country that used to be something else. Does it have a strong program that the student is interested in should matter. Who cares where they rank in retention rate or whatever. |
PP could be a troll or has genuine interest. Whatever the case stop clicking and stop posting if you are not interested. |
Boston college was never a commuter school. Never. |
That's pretty much the only thing hater trolls can attack. However, retention rate is one of the most important metrics. School A: 1 student out of 10 students decide not to return, 90% retention School B: 1 student out of 100 students decide not to return, 99% retention What does it it tell you? It's closely related to the student support/service and satisfaction level. It's one of the important factors in making college decision. |
Really? From BC website "Boston College was founded in 1863 by the Society of Jesus (the Jesuits) to educate Boston’s predominantly Irish, Catholic immigrant community. It opened its doors on September 5, 1864, in a building on Harrison Avenue in Boston’s South End, a “small streetcar college” for commuting students." |
Facts and citations > DCUM trolls |
|
https://beacon.bc.edu/the-long-view/
When Patrick Stokes ’64 first stepped onto the Boston College campus as an undergraduate student in 1961, there were only a handful of residence halls on campus. McElroy Commons was the newest building. Carney Hall didn’t exist. Neither did Higgins Hall, nor Robsham Theater Arts Center, nor the Brighton campus. But by 1964, when he graduated, Pat had begun to see rapid change on the horizon with the opening of three residence halls—Roncalli, Williams, and Walsh—to accommodate the growing number of students who needed to live at the Heights. “Boston College was considered a commuter school back then,” says Pat Stokes. “And now students come from across the country and all over the world,” he continues. “We have some of the top programs, and we are recognized throughout the United States.” |
|
I don't think anyone disputes Northeastern's retention rate is top 10 in the country.
Part of the reason is pretty simple. Some schools, especially larger publics, have to weed out kids. It's the nature of the business. Northeastern admits to the university, and not to a college and/or degree. They just try to get the smartest kids they can. Obviously the ones who show up are academically capable. If you get into Northeastern, you will graduate from Northeastern. |
It was. It began as a school for local Irish Catholic men at a time when Irish immigrants were pouring into Boston and not exactly welcome. They left Boston proper to expand in chestnut hill. They went coed in the 1970s and kept growing. |
Nope…real person sick of this thread |
Stop clicking and posting. |
Unless they are cooking this metric too. NEU tries to get the smartest kids they think will attend. Not the smartest kids. |
+1 |
THIS. |
| Why does it matter if any college was a commuter college 40 or 50 years ago? |