Pipeline

[Anonymous]

How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

For boys they are amongst the best clubs in the area alongside Baltimore Armour, Bethesda and Arlington. For girls - not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

Where is pipeline dad when you need him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

were they playing just pipeline? pretty sure it was a bunch of clubs at these friendlies hosted by pipeline

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

were they playing just pipeline? pretty sure it was a bunch of clubs at these friendlies hosted by pipeline

yes, it was a mishmash of friendlies with several clubs involved.

[Anonymous]

Pipeline, Bethesda, McLean, Herndon, Arlington, Metro United were all there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How were the scrimmages vs Mclean this past weekend? Is Pipeline really that good and do people think they may be a team worth traveling to?

Where is pipeline dad when you need him?

LOL! I was thinking this! There are pages on pages of pipeline boasting on this forum.

[Anonymous]

I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

Exaggerating somewhat. Even the boys side cannot claim to be competing for best team in the area in all age groups. No club - even Armour or Arlington - can legitimately claim that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

Exaggerating somewhat. Even the boys side cannot claim to be competing for best team in the area in all age groups. No club - even Armour or Arlington - can legitimately claim that.

Not the PP, but he said that of the teams he saw, they could compete for the best team in the area in each team's age group. He didn't claim to have watched every Pipeline team in every age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

Exaggerating somewhat. Even the boys side cannot claim to be competing for best team in the area in all age groups. No club - even Armour or Arlington - can legitimately claim that.

Not the PP, but he said that of the teams he saw, they could compete for the best team in the area in each team's age group. He didn't claim to have watched every Pipeline team in every age group.

Hmm. I've reread what he wrote and find it hard to read in any way bit the way I read it the first time. No biggie anyway - I was being picky. I would certainly agree that the pipeline boys teams are all strong and at least one of them (maybe more - I have not seen all of them play ) would certainly challenge for best in the area in its age group. I don't know much about the girls teams although have seen it suggested that they are not as strong on the girls side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

Exaggerating somewhat. Even the boys side cannot claim to be competing for best team in the area in all age groups. No club - even Armour or Arlington - can legitimately claim that.

Not the PP, but he said that of the teams he saw, they could compete for the best team in the area in each team's age group. He didn't claim to have watched every Pipeline team in every age group.

Hmm. I've reread what he wrote and find it hard to read in any way bit the way I read it the first time. No biggie anyway - I was being picky. I would certainly agree that the pipeline boys teams are all strong and at least one of them (maybe more - I have not seen all of them play ) would certainly challenge for best in the area in its age group. I don't know much about the girls teams although have seen it suggested that they are not as strong on the girls side.

Which boy's team impressed/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Pipeline dad but did see several teams play this weekend. Any parent or coach who saw any of the Pipeline teams play will tell you that those teams are strong and will compete for the best team in the area in all of its age groups. No other club can say that not even my DDs club.

Exaggerating somewhat. Even the boys side cannot claim to be competing for best team in the area in all age groups. No club - even Armour or Arlington - can legitimately claim that.

Not the PP, but he said that of the teams he saw, they could compete for the best team in the area in each team's age group. He didn't claim to have watched every Pipeline team in every age group.

Hmm. I've reread what he wrote and find it hard to read in any way bit the way I read it the first time. No biggie anyway - I was being picky. I would certainly agree that the pipeline boys teams are all strong and at least one of them (maybe more - I have not seen all of them play ) would certainly challenge for best in the area in its age group. I don't know much about the girls teams although have seen it suggested that they are not as strong on the girls side.

Which boy's team impressed/

Not your kids.

[Anonymous]

Folks, Any girls coach or parent knows Pipeline is a very competitive club. Granted, the club is stepping up to ECNL but the club can compete for the top team in most age groups. Again, just ask any coach.

[Anonymous]

To add more fuel to the ECNL > GA fire, half of the Pipeline 04 team played for Baltimore Armour DA last year. It will be interesting to see what Baltimore Armour’s current roster is like. If GA ever publishes rosters.