Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now (PART TWO)

[Anonymous]

I agree that it was petty of him to take the blog down, let her have the dumb thing. What I don't get is why it's this huge, dramatic deal when she literally posted on it MAYBE 6-7 times a YEAR. It's not like she was posting every day or making an income off of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree that it was petty of him to take the blog down, let her have the dumb thing. What I don't get is why it's this huge, dramatic deal when she literally posted on it MAYBE 6-7 times a YEAR. It's not like she was posting every day or making an income off of it.

Agreed. Her posting was so sporadic there is no way she was making any considerable income from that thing. And if she hadn't been able to commit to it in the last few years what makes her think all of a sudden it's her big moneymaker? I'm pretty sure her source of income is Kane's salary at this point. Just tired of her whining about taking the "high road" while making vague references to everything that's been going on in almost every single social media post she has made in the last few months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree that it was petty of him to take the blog down, let her have the dumb thing. What I don't get is why it's this huge, dramatic deal when she literally posted on it MAYBE 6-7 times a YEAR. It's not like she was posting every day or making an income off of it.

Agreed. Her posting was so sporadic there is no way she was making any considerable income from that thing. And if she hadn't been able to commit to it in the last few years what makes her think all of a sudden it's her big moneymaker? I'm pretty sure her source of income is Kane's salary at this point. Just tired of her whining about taking the "high road" while making vague references to everything that's been going on in almost every single social media post she has made in the last few months.

ITA. and it seemed so overdramatic for her to make some reference to him taking 'the only thing she was excited about in the future'. don't tell me that now you've suddenly decided to pour your heart and soul into blogging.

all of this is such a mess. the two of them deserve each other because they BOTH can't keep their mouths shut online about something that really shouldn't be discussed in a public forum. sad for the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree that it was petty of him to take the blog down, let her have the dumb thing. What I don't get is why it's this huge, dramatic deal when she literally posted on it MAYBE 6-7 times a YEAR. It's not like she was posting every day or making an income off of it.

I think it's a big deal because

1) it's the biggest platform she has for her voice. He has a radio show with lots of listeners who heard HIS side of the story. Some day she may want to tell HER side of the story, and with the blog being gone, she wouldn't have that space to put it on. She has built a following for her blog, regardless of how often she posted.

2) I'm not saying it's a viable option, but I think Natasha was hopeful that she could grow the blog to be one that produces income, especially now that she will most likely have to produce income to support herself and the girls (in addition to the child support I assume she'll get).

3) it's just a d--- move on his part to take something that she had worked on and loved away.

JMHO

[Anonymous]

i don't listen to the show anymore because it feels like everyone on it hates each other. oh and danni sucks. i just flip between whatever station is actually playing music!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree that it was petty of him to take the blog down, let her have the dumb thing. What I don't get is why it's this huge, dramatic deal when she literally posted on it MAYBE 6-7 times a YEAR. It's not like she was posting every day or making an income off of it.

I think it's a big deal because

1) it's the biggest platform she has for her voice. He has a radio show with lots of listeners who heard HIS side of the story. Some day she may want to tell HER side of the story, and with the blog being gone, she wouldn't have that space to put it on. She has built a following for her blog, regardless of how often she posted.

2) I'm not saying it's a viable option, but I think Natasha was hopeful that she could grow the blog to be one that produces income, especially now that she will most likely have to produce income to support herself and the girls (in addition to the child support I assume she'll get).

3) it's just a d--- move on his part to take something that she had worked on and loved away.

JMHO

I mean if I was pissed off at my ex while still footing the bill for all of her "hobbies" I'd probably try to minimize the expenses I had to shell out for her too. She can't say she didn't see that coming. I don't understand why she didn't have some plan to move the site or transfer ownership before this happened.

[Anonymous]

This is the stupidest topic ever on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Then why are you reading it

[Anonymous]

I'm glad she finally posted somethimng...Kane is a dick. I will never listen to that fake ass show again. I haven't been enjoying the show lately because I question if every caller, bit is fake.

[Anonymous]

I'm guessing Kane lives in the same highrise apartments the couple lived in on The Newlywed Show:the first years? It's near the iPic theater?

[Anonymous]

He took her site down in an effort to assert control. Not cool.

[Anonymous]

First time poster, long time reader.

1) i agree it was a dick move to take her site. But also agree with the other posters, she hasn't posted much content in forever. I also agree with other posters on Natasha should either tell her side of the story or not comment but those vague passive aggressive comments are really annoying. Did you see her sister, or other family member, was posting on P's IG about taking her site. I feel like Nat has her family do her dirty work. Just come out with it already!!

2) The fake bits on the show... I can't believe you guys thought they were real. All major morning shows use these fake bits, elvis duran, Ryan Seacrest, etc. It's a formula for their type of show. It is similar to how Elliott in the morning is just like Howard Stern's show. I don't think they are going to stop doing them. Apparently people across the country love these bits.

3) 100% agree about Rose. I actually enjoy the show when Danni is off and rose is on. I do find Danni to be annoying.

4) I don't like the STM show. I don't know something is off. The funny thing is I think their show reminds me of the earlier days of the Kane Show. The kane show has been broadcasting in the DC Metro area for like 10 yrs. I am curious to see how the STM Show changes once they start getting big sponsors and syndication. I think the issue with the former show members was P trying to blow up the show. After those ppl left he went into syndication in several other networks. He seems to be a perfectionist and that can be difficult to work with/for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here she goes again on the black women breast feeding. "Don't say it's not a racial issue" oh please.

Oh my lord, black women are being discriminated against for breast feeding? By who? White women? Is that why such a "club" exists and is necessary? That is a serious question. I have never in my life heard of such a ridiculous thing.

Its not about being discriminated against dummy, its that not a lot of African american women breastfeed. 20% less than white women, and they just have less support in general when it comes to breast feeding. so before you make ignorant comments like that, maybe you should research the matter first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here she goes again on the black women breast feeding. "Don't say it's not a racial issue" oh please.

Oh my lord, black women are being discriminated against for breast feeding? By who? White women? Is that why such a "club" exists and is necessary? That is a serious question. I have never in my life heard of such a ridiculous thing.

Its not about being discriminated against dummy, its that not a lot of African american women breastfeed. 20% less than white women, and they just have less support in general when it comes to breast feeding. so before you make ignorant comments like that, maybe you should research the matter first.

Well now that hospitals are doing away with the free formula care packages, maybe it will increase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here she goes again on the black women breast feeding. "Don't say it's not a racial issue" oh please.

Oh my lord, black women are being discriminated against for breast feeding? By who? White women? Is that why such a "club" exists and is necessary? That is a serious question. I have never in my life heard of such a ridiculous thing.

Its not about being discriminated against dummy, its that not a lot of African american women breastfeed. 20% less than white women, and they just have less support in general when it comes to breast feeding. so before you make ignorant comments like that, maybe you should research the matter first.

hi danni!