Biden's SOTU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Forgot to remove the Russian comments in the upper corner...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.

Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.

But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.

The person that killed this woman was not supposed to be in the United States. It is illegal for him to be in our country.

It’s ghoulish to allow people in our country that should not be here. They are killing our citizens. There is no reason for this woman to have been murdered. She’s dead because Biden is letting everyone come in.

You are neither truthful with yourself or rational, not about immigrants and not about immigration. Far more American citizens are killing American citizens. Especially with our lax gun laws. You are brainwashed. People like YOU are why this country is going down the toilet.

Your solution is to let more killers in.

No. I would like immigration reform. I just don't demonize and dehumanize immigrants, because I'm not a completely morally bankrupt, lying a-hole who has no common sense and no compassion. Like you and all the other PPs on here making stuff up about illegal immigrants.

This act is a common sense and bipartisan reform that doesn’t demonize or dehumanize immigrants.

The GOP has NO INTEREST in actually participating in legislation addressing immigration reform. They just want to use the issue to whip their base into a froth. They have no credibility at this point. None. Zero. Nada. No matter what the Dems do, if the GOP thinks reform will help the dems politically, they won't participate. It is better for them politically to keep lying and doing nothing.

So spare me.

+3

To add to that: the GOP doesn’t want to fight cancer, or take care of our veterans or make sure that we have safe drinking water. They’re out of step with America.

Yes, yes, that must be it.

Laken (Lincoln) Riley sends her regards.

Republicans spent the last month of the 2018 election campaigning on the “migrant invasion” and Democrats won by 8.6 pts.

We have had quite a change of events since 2018. Seeing that immigration - specifically ILLEGAL immigration is the #1 issue - and given that Joe seems to be more worried about using the euphemisms created by Democrats than he is about actually taking action to stop the flow - I would say the American people see who to trust when it comes to doing something about border security. And, it sure ain't Joe.

PP. OK, let's look at the Feb election for NY-3. GOP ran on tHe bOrdEr and got crushed.

Face it, you got owned by Biden at SOTU. Even Lankford mouthed "it's true" that the immigration bill was strong. But then pappa Don weighed in and MAGA in the House sh i t their pants and called off the vote.

You can cry ILLEGAL all you want but you don't want to do anything about immigration except to round up brown people.
MAGA will lose in Nov. It's just a question of how much.

Here's a little secret..... NY-3 was lost when Santos was kicked out. And, not only did Suozzi have name recognition - HE RAN ON BORDER SECURITY.
Here's another little secret..... what we are seeing at our border is not merely brown people. There are people coming from all over the world..... Chinese, Iranians, Egyptians, ..... you name the country, and we probably have their citizens arriving.
Joe is unwilling to secure the border. He is more concerned with using the accepted terminology instead of protecting the American citizens.

[Anonymous]

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

[Anonymous]

Now Biden wants our military near or in Gaza? Hell no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now Biden wants our military near or in Gaza? Hell no.

Our military is helping the Zionist mass murderers, that’s okay with you?? God forbid our military provides food to dying people, oh the horror!

[Anonymous]

Old Yeller

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Now do every piece of complete BS that has come out of Trumps mouth. We’ll wait.

Pretty much everything he says is exaggeration and outright lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Forgot to remove the Russian comments in the upper corner...

Forgot? Nah. Donald doesn’t care. If he supporters haven’t noticed their party’s treasonous support for Russia yet, they’re not going to notice or care because of some letters on a shared video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
[…]
6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Once again a list showing the extent to which the New York Times’s right wing bent affects their coverage. Republicans are always talking about cutting Social Security.

https://crr.bc.edu/congressional-republicans-want-big-cuts-to-social-security/

Just because the GOP candidates aren’t allowed to discuss the GOP plans to cut social security doesn’t mean the party isn’t constantly working on it. https://crr.bc.edu/congressional-republicans-want-big-cuts-to-social-security/

That’s just one point. The right wing media hates the fact that Biden knocked it out of the park after months of them focusing on his age and alleged decrepitude. They got owned as hard as humanly possible by Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Now do every piece of complete BS that has come out of Trumps mouth. We’ll wait.

Pretty much everything he says is exaggeration and outright lies.

This message board would crash. It wouldn’t have enough memory/bandwidth to deal with the tens of thousands of lies.

[Anonymous]

I think it's safe to say that President Biden absolutely killed it during the SOTU!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it's safe to say that President Biden absolutely killed it during the SOTU!

He did. And you can see the media trying to kneecap him again.

[Anonymous]

Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

“…lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century” is great to you?

Why are Biden supporters so willing to settle for such a dire situation? Put your focus on getting him to retire and get some fresh blood in for this election.