Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
+1000 |
-100000000 |
sure. just like you have a reasonable chance of getting in NBA if you're black and a play body of over 90% blacks. |
-100000000000000000000000000000000000 |
How many Asians apply and how many got in? Let's see what you call "a reasonable chance." If you have evidence that being Asian brings bonus points during TJ admissions, please publish it. |
This is true. It's also true that the GBRS holds a lot of weight, more than it should if the latest AAP report is any indication. Why would a school go out of its way to get rid of the highest scoring URM students? |
| FCPS definitely downplayed TJ admissions this year and not just because of Covid-19. |
|
Part of the benefit of those types of schools is the consistently high caliber of the students. If they start accepting a certain percentage from every race just to be "fair", that defeats the premise of the school. They may as well just have a lottery.
Someone mentioned the NBA, and I agree that it's the same thing. If the NBA was forced to accept a certain % of white and Asian and hispanic players just because that's representative of the population that lives in the area, that defeats the purpose of the NBA. It would be something, but it wouldn't be the same thing as it is now - the best of the best. And like entry to TJ, I'm sure there is some decision-making process that goes on about who should be invited to join a team - it's not just some specific number, it's a whole bunch of things. If there's any evidence of black kids (or white kids, for that matter, if you're talking about TJ) having the scores and extracurriculars to be admitted entry and not getting in, then that would be a problem. They really should do a lottery in that case, for everyone deemed eligible. But unless that is going on, people need to just accept that some things in society are still a meritocracy. |
|
I'm saying the numbers of highly qualified black and Hispanic students applying to TJ will likely be low because they don't buy into the narrative that going to TJ will help them get into a better school. If that group self selects out of applying to TJ, then the numbers won't be great. |
The GBRS make a huge difference in being found eligible. It's not only getting Cs, the narrative that goes along with it matters. |
What's unattractive to others is how much of TJ is now a rat race as opposed to how it was before. Before kids who really enjoyed STEM would find their place at TJ. Now, even if you love STEM, you also need to be prepared for the rat race. My DC is taking multivariable/matrix in 11th at the base school. While that may not be TJ pace, that's wonderful for a STEM kid who doesn't want to be in a pressure cooker environment. When you have those options at the base school, there's no pressing need to go to TJ. For my Asian friends, however, TJ is viewed as the goal, even for nonSTEM kids. DC's friend thinks she wants to be a lawyer, but her mom was insistent that she had to apply to TJ. I don't have a problem with TJ being predominantly Asian. If Asian kids want to go there and are ok with the environment while other races aren't, so be it. Accept it and move on. So many kids from TJ end up at UVA anyway, as do many base school kids. My friend's kids, one went to TJ and one didn't, and both ended up being accepted by top 10 schools. Honestly, pick the right environment for your kid. If it's TJ, great. If it's not, your kid is not disadvantaged by not having gone to TJ. |
Seriously. The NBA is different for a host of reasons, but most importantly it is private whereas FCPS is public. And if you want to hold it up as a pure meritocracy, and not yet another business where eons of progress are yet to occur, I look forward to your defense of its coaching, administrative, and owner demographics. TJ’s admission process and selection criteria is undeniably discriminatory against protected black, Hispanic, and poor students. I would prefer that my taxes did not subsidize discrimination. |
One way I would view TJ as discriminatory is if it factors in what extracurricular activities kids have done. That is highly dependent on financial resources. They should also not value taking Algebra 2 in eighth grade over taking geometry in eighth grade because that is also likely dependent on having outside math help to accelerate. The test also should not include math that is well beyond what someone who's taken and fully mastered Algebra 1 and geometry can handle, because otherwise it perpetuates the bias of having resources to accelerate math because of outside help. My friends' kids were taking CYT math classes in elementary school. No poor kid is doing that. |
| They need to study and work harder. Everyone takes the same test and is held to the same standard. |