|
Depends on the kid! I am a parent of SWW grad and a big 3 grad. SWW wouldn’t have liked private and vice versa. SWW kids were a cut above, though, academically and without any of the tutoring and supports the private kids have. It is inspiring.
SWW grad is very sporty and yes there are no athletic facilities on site. But it is part of the charm and as a result that child knows how to find a team / field / gym wherever they are. On the other hand, private school kid loves the convenience and ease of top of the line everything. This DC sees a very different world. |
There’s absolutely nothing charming about not having on-site athletic facilities. You’re trying too hard. |
Can you elaborate |
| What did you decide? |
OP's kid is finishing sophomore year in college now. If they chose Walls, they spent half of high school on line. |
Ha- funny. Asking the parents who revived the thread this year. |
| The reason I wouldn’t be excited about public for high school if my kid had the chance for private is the amount of time spent on standardized tests. I work with public and charter schools throughout the city, and even in a school like Walls, their ranking in the city matters. And so not only is your kid spending unnecessary hours prepping for and taking standardized test that don’t even matter for their own learning and growth, but the teachers have this stress pulling at them too. instead of thinking, how can I get my students really into this content that will give them an enriching academic and life experience? they are thinking about that stuff. |
| Just declined TJ for Big3. Not a hard choice for us. |
No, and you should read this thread to see why declining a Big 3 spot for Walls is a bad idea: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1272252.page |
|
It depends on the kid. My oldest kid, attending a Big 3, would have hated Walls. The second kid, also attending a Big 3, might have liked Walls, but is thriving where she is.
|
The brightest kids don't spend much time prepping for standardized tests, because standardized tests are typically easy for this group. Therefore teachers do have lots of time to give them engaging content. |
That’s not typically what happens in a public school classroom and you know it. Those bright kids are seated in the back of the class and either given busy work or ignored. I personally have a combined 18 years of experience with DCPS to back this up (in “the best” WotP public schools). That’s why we moved our children to private schools for high school. |
|
If DC doesn't get into Sidwell or BIM, we will consider SWW.
https://www.niche.com/k12/search/best-private-high-schools/m/washington-dc-metro-area/ |
Stop it, BIM Booster! 🙄 |
But the poster isn't talking about bright kids in DCPS generally, but about kids at SWW. Did you have kids at Walls? I wouldn't find it strange if teachers there don't have to spend a ton of time teaching to the test (except for AP's), because all the kids there are selected from a pool of high performers. |