Fed lawyers with homes worth $1 million (even if they bought at lower prices), can afford a 75$/85$ ticket.
|
If you own a house that's worth close to $1 million, you're wealthy, even if you don't feel like you have the cash flow to spend $150 on auction tickets. |
Let's call it as it is. Some wealthy people are cheap about public goods. They'll happily buy an expensive handbag, tickets to Disney, or pay for travel soccer, but 150$ that will go to help someone else's kid, that's "a luxury." |
All the elderly widows holding onto their Capitol Hill rowhouses, which they bought for 100k and could now sell for a million, would disagree. Even I would disagree, and we paid 400k for ours over a decade ago. If we sold, where would we live? |
This exactly. +100 |
|
Why are we picking on Janney? Here are the peer auction prices.
Lafayette: $75 Murch: $75 Janney: $85 Key: $90 Mann: $75 |
Gee. Wherever could you find a home to live with proceeds your 1 million dollar home. P.S. Few elderly widows have Janney aged kids.
|
|
Seriously.
Need help understanding that equity and equality are not the same? https://medium.com/@CRA1G/the-evolution-of-an-accidental-meme-ddc4e139e0e4 |
Um... because the OP posted about Janney. |
BC Janney started the discussion. BC Janney did not indicate that there was any mechanism to ensure that it was possible for those of different means to be able to attend and support the school. If its really about raising $, wouldn't you accept donations to the best of the donor's ability? (FWIW- this is what my school offers, as do cultural institutions like the Metropolitan Museum of NY.) |
Exactly. All of these schools do the same thing to raise funds. I personally have no issue with it, but it's not a school-specific thing. If you want to crap on DCPS PTA rules, fine. But picking on Janney for raising money like everyone else seems weird. |
Not if it doesn't cover the cost of the ticket. And while you are welcome to visit the met for any donation, you are not invited to a met benefit if you can't pay. |
And it's really uncomfortable not to pay full price at a museum even on a Tuesday. They give you the stink eye. |
So true. |
|
I'm comfortable contributing less, but in line with what we can afford. I know others can, and do, pay the full price.
Difference is, I can't afford to pay full price for a ticket + a babysitter + purchase things at the school auction. So I shouldn't be able to go? I'd be happy volunteering- which I already do- and to purchase items as well. But why does it have to be all or nothing? Smacks of elitism. Oh, and I happen to be a teetotaler. Happy not to eat if that would make you feel better. But imposing an artificially high ticket price for entry into an event hosted by and for a public institution SHOULD be accessible to all in the community. If you are so wealthy, why don't you allocate, or purchase extra tickets so the less well off amongst us can also attend? (And no, I'm not on any type of social welfare program, have a job, provide for my child, but can't squeeze out an extra $300 for this.) I know Mundo Verde and ITS get beat up a lot on DCUM, but they have a better way of handling things. As does Ross. I don't feel good about only the rich, disposable income types attending. That is the opposite of community building. Seems like more about building a wall. |