Thoughts on the new Churchill principal?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mrs. Heckert is creating a more dangerous safety hazard than currently exists.

Signed - Active WCHS PTSA Member who tries to run the school


fixed that for you . . .


Thank you for your snide comment but do you have anything constructive to add to the conversation? A parent shouldn't be bashed for taking an active role in the school community.

Mrs. Heckert has yet to meet the PTSA community at a meeting. Yet she says she got PTSA input?
Anonymous
Maybe she met with the PTA president? One would hope at least all the officers...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe she met with the PTA president? One would hope at least all the officers...


Even if she met with the officers, the officers don't speak for the PTSA membership unless the issue is discussed and voted by the membership.
Anonymous
Not true at all. If there isn't a meeting, the Board can still give input and make decisions. This isn't about spending PTA funds, the Board doesn't need to consult with the membership on every little thing.

Former PTA Officer and former PTA President
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not true at all. If there isn't a meeting, the Board can still give input and make decisions. This isn't about spending PTA funds, the Board doesn't need to consult with the membership on every little thing.

Former PTA Officer and former PTA President


This is an issue that has a large impact on parents and students. I would hope that the PTSA officers realize that their input is limited unless brought collectively to membership, even if a special membership meeting needs to be held in light the September meeting was canceled.
Anonymous
The statement "I have worked with the PTSA" implies that she worked with the membership. Everyone knows we did not have a PTSA membership meeting since she has been principal so it hurts her credibility to make that type of statement. Not a great way to start a new job.

If Mrs. Heckert only met with the PTSA President or the PTSA officers, then be specific and state that. They don't speak for everyone outside of a vote but they can be individuals with opinions.

Frankly, it is a poor decision to not get community wide input before moving buses to the limited space in the Victory Lane loop.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mrs. Heckert is creating a more dangerous safety hazard than currently exists.

Signed - Active WCHS PTSA Member who tries to run the school


fixed that for you . . .


Thank you for your snide comment but do you have anything constructive to add to the conversation? A parent shouldn't be bashed for taking an active role in the school community.

Mrs. Heckert has yet to meet the PTSA community at a meeting. Yet she says she got PTSA input?


I’m not an administrator and think plenty of them need better skills, particularly in the area of communication, but I still feel sympathetic toward Mrs. Heckert. Parents can be tough! She’s working with a consulting principal since she’s a first year principal—she could get support as needed.
Anonymous
Transportation was supposed to have been reviewed last spring after a student was hit by a car. Why wasn't the bus issue addressed through that process and discussion? It seems like MCPS didn't consider the bus issue till after the start of the school year.

As a parent, I am concerned about the large number of students who are walking through the Victory parking lot at the end of the school day. Mixing buses with students and their cars seems like an accident waiting to happen. If MCPS needs the extra loop for buses, then they should switch the student parking lot with the faculty parking lot. This would cut down on students walking through the bus area to get to their cars.
Anonymous
You all act that the membership of the PTSA are the only ones who can provide input that matters.

Parents make up the PTSA. If parents reached out to her and spoke to her about the issue, then so what if she didn't speak to the precious PTSA.
Anonymous
Give her a chance to get up to speed..you parents are a nightmare! There were complaints about previous principal and everyone is already started with the negative critique of new principal. You overbearing parents beed to stop!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Give her a chance to get up to speed..you parents are a nightmare! There were complaints about previous principal and everyone is already started with the negative critique of new principal. You overbearing parents beed to stop!

+100
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Give her a chance to get up to speed..you parents are a nightmare! There were complaints about previous principal and everyone is already started with the negative critique of new principal. You overbearing parents beed to stop!

+100



Seriously—we’re in year 5 of a terrible principal, but everyone gave him a chance in years one and two to learn the job. If she still sucks in years three and so on, then I’d start complaining. But conserve your energy. Mcps gets rid of no one who can show the most basic level of competence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Give her a chance to get up to speed..you parents are a nightmare! There were complaints about previous principal and everyone is already started with the negative critique of new principal. You overbearing parents beed to stop!

+100



Seriously—we’re in year 5 of a terrible principal, but everyone gave him a chance in years one and two to learn the job. If she still sucks in years three and so on, then I’d start complaining. But conserve your energy. Mcps gets rid of no one who can show the most basic level of competence.


When it is a school safety issue, parents can't afford to be silent. Moving large buses to a small lot with many students walking through the area is a safety issue.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You all act that the membership of the PTSA are the only ones who can provide input that matters.

Parents make up the PTSA. If parents reached out to her and spoke to her about the issue, then so what if she didn't speak to the precious PTSA.


It is her email that implies she received PTSA input that jeopardizes her credibility. No one is served by a principal that has difficulty with being open and honest.
Anonymous
There's a subset of the Churchill families that had disfunctional principals at Beverly Farms, Hoover, and Churchill. The new principal was rubber stamped by the old director in similar fashion as the current Hoover principal was rubber stamped by the director at the time. Parents are tired of how MCPS trains it's leadership to operate. Heckert is falling into the pitfalls of the MCPS training.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: