Calling people freeloaders just because they exercise their freedom of choice is calling them a name. For example you can say "people who don't join the union" and have a more adult argument. |
What would you do differently to hire for the students you have now? Who should he recruited? |
Boom. Def saw that before we left for private. I’m still bitter. Did not move to MoCo with the intent of going private. |
Another boom. So is this just a sign of the general decline of our society? Or is this attributable to a lack of leadership? |
Thank God for them. It is the only way things will change. |
I'm all for this, but it's a pipe dream. Look at the Kemp Mill situation. After all of the press and union "action," the principal, who bullied teachers in PA, is still there. The county will shut it down and again again if it resurfaces. And teachers will leave - perhaps en masse. But the county won't care. I left the county for a smaller system. It's the same there, too. Central office bullies administrators, and they, in turn, bully teachers. No one wants to take responsibility for anything. Until more teachers leave the system entirely or find ways to open their own schools built on tolerance and respect, all systems will eventually implode. It may take longer for the smaller systems to feel the pain, but they, too, will suffer as more and more parents with means find out other options. Right now, I just have to get my kids through school. Their system (not the same as mine) will survive long enough to ensure they'll receive a solid education. This wasn't the case back in MCPS. But while I say that, I feel the doom and gloom, as I always ask, "What about my grandkids?" What protections do we have in place for them? MCPS is too far gone - too large and dysfunctional- to change it from within. My current system offers a bit more hope, but while I see it, those entrenched - those who have been in this tiny system for most of their lives (as both students and employees) - don't see the bigger picture. It's very sad. |
| As voters we can demand change, it honestly just takes raising awareness and this would only take 1-2 stories in the Washington Post. |
What term would you use for people who receive a benefit that other people pay for? |
| I posted the term freeloaders first and stand by it. They are receiving benefits they don't pay for, which in the long run will end weakening the union, meaning eventually ALL will lose benefits. Selfish, freeloader, etc., all acceptable in this situation. |
It's a choice. You can be bitter and call people juvenile names if they don't do what you want them to do but in the end, the union needs to prove their worth if they want to survive. I personally think the system would be better off without a union so I don't join. |
| It is concerning to hear about teachers being bullied by administrators into doing unethical things |
Tax evaders |
I don’t think that’s it. |
|
Here's an idea, if union members do not want non-union members to benefit from their collective bargaining for free, why don't the collective bargaining contracts only cover the union members.
I am confident in my skillset and ability to negotiate a higher wage and benefits than our current union. I wouldn't mind being released from their support of mediocracy in our schools. If I am not happy with the outcome, I can move to the private sector or another public school system that would value what I can do. The United States is a free market society. |
Actually, free riders. That's the definition of "free rider" - someone who uses resources, public goods, or services but does not pay for them. If you benefit from being part of the bargaining unit but you are not a member, then you are a free rider. |