You may not agree with Trump but he means business

[Anonymous]

I don't undestand why people are talking about illegal immigration in this thread about removing TPS status.

The people living here under TPS ARE LEGAL. By removing TPS now you're creating 200,000 illegal residents.

[Anonymous]

They work hard, they pay taxes, they worked and helped the economy

[Anonymous]

WTF, is wrong with liberals who can't bring themselves not to defend or rationalize the action of illegals in breaking the law?

In fact, what happened to the liberals and the Democratic party which had a commonsense policy that essentially said that while legal immigrants were welcome, those who entered the country illegally were not welcome and would be deported?

I recall Barbara Jordan arguing strenuously that illegals entering the country put blue collar blacks at a disadvantage. The Democratic party has gone off the rails and they don't even realize that it has happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't undestand why people are talking about illegal immigration in this thread about removing TPS status.

The people living here under TPS ARE LEGAL. By removing TPS now you're creating 200,000 illegal residents.

Which is why there is discussion about illegals ........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't undestand why people are talking about illegal immigration in this thread about removing TPS status.

The people living here under TPS ARE LEGAL. By removing TPS now you're creating 200,000 illegal residents.

They got here illegally. Then TPS granted them temporary legal status. Once TPS is repealed, they are once again illegal and must leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They work hard, they pay taxes, they worked and helped the economy

Do you have any supporting data or are you just spouting off your random thoughts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course democrats want to amnesty as many immigrants as possible given that third worlders would vote for democrats for the welfare.

and of course some Rs want cheap foreign labor since it helps their bottom line. Rs want to make money off their backs, but god forbid they should have any rights.

Yea sure many of the rich ones do. The middle class and poor ones don’t. That’s why trump speaks for the middle class and poor on immigration.

lol.. too funny given that Trump is one of those "rich ones". OMG. You do know that his resorts hire cheap foreign labor from Eastern Europe, and that in his first few months in office he raised those h2b visas by another 15k, and that his first pick for Labor Sec was a man who professed to loving cheap foreign labor? omg, seriously?????!!!!

It’s policy that I care about. If Trump enforces the country’s immigration laws which dem and rep presidents have declined to do for decades, then I’m on the MAGA train.

oh, so, now the story is "policy that you care about" and not the middle class and poor ones. Got it. My how the story changes when you paint yourself into a corner.

I care about policy, too, but I care more that we don't have an unfit person in the WH.

Your post is incoherent.

Yes it’s policy that I care about, the policy that helps working-class and middle-class Americans. The policy of enforcing our laws. That’s why Donald Trump is so wonderful on immigration.

So why is Trump importing foreign H2bs to work on his properties instead of those working class Americans? You're the one who seems incoherent.

Who is going to take the jobs that the Salvadorans leave behind? Americans aren't lining up to take jobs as maids, cooks, fruitpickers and landscapers. Even Trump has said so.

The Trump Organization has secured visas to hire 70 foreign workers who will be employed during the 2017-18 season as maids, cooks, and servers.

Despite running on an ‘American jobs’ ticket, Trump’s former company – which is currently run by his sons Donald Jr. and Eric – has opted to take on foreign labor at the president’s Mar-a-Lago resort, which is dubbed the ‘Winter White House.’

Trump has previously defended hiring workers from outside the U.S., stating back in 2016 when he was questioned by Senator Marco Rubio about hiring foreign labor: “It’s very, very hard to get people. Other hotels do the exact same thing.”

Trump is too cheap to pay wages Americans will work for. And seriously? The excuse is that it's okay because others do it? Your 'logic' fails bigly, dear. But then again, hypocrisy is the only thing Trumpkins have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't undestand why people are talking about illegal immigration in this thread about removing TPS status.

The people living here under TPS ARE LEGAL. By removing TPS now you're creating 200,000 illegal residents.

People are stupid. Like Trump prattling on about the visa lottery as if other nations somehow “give” applicants the right to apply at a US embassy for the chance to secure a visa. The buffoon who can’t read a balance sheet or negotiate the fine points of the tax bill, doesn’t likely understand how a lottery works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They work hard, they pay taxes, they worked and helped the economy

Do you have any supporting data or are you just spouting off your random thoughts?

Are you lazy, stupid, or both?

[Anonymous]

Like I said, all these anti-immigration folks are the sons and daughters of immigrants. It is one thing that makes it so sad.

Also, like I said, I think you will find that most of them came here from countries who do not understand democracy, or why striving for an equal playing field is good. These are the sons and daughters of the strivers--political refugees who looted their own countries on their way out the door. They were raised to treat life as a zero sum game and that's the only metric they understand.

It's pathetic and sad, and mostly I do pity them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like I said, all these anti-immigration folks are the sons and daughters of immigrants. It is one thing that makes it so sad.

Also, like I said, I think you will find that most of them came here from countries who do not understand democracy, or why striving for an equal playing field is good. These are the sons and daughters of the strivers--political refugees who looted their own countries on their way out the door. They were raised to treat life as a zero sum game and that's the only metric they understand.

It's pathetic and sad, and mostly I do pity them.

Like Trump. Married not one, but two immigrants and is also the son of an immigrant. One of the wives even looks to have immigrated illegally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't undestand why people are talking about illegal immigration in this thread about removing TPS status.

The people living here under TPS ARE LEGAL. By removing TPS now you're creating 200,000 illegal residents.

Exactly. Eliminating DACA did this as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like I said, all these anti-immigration folks are the sons and daughters of immigrants. It is one thing that makes it so sad.

Also, like I said, I think you will find that most of them came here from countries who do not understand democracy, or why striving for an equal playing field is good. These are the sons and daughters of the strivers--political refugees who looted their own countries on their way out the door. They were raised to treat life as a zero sum game and that's the only metric they understand.

It's pathetic and sad, and mostly I do pity them.

In a nutshell:
"I got mine, I'm pulling up the ladder, screw everyone else."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They work hard, they pay taxes, they worked and helped the economy

Do you have any supporting data or are you just spouting off your random thoughts?

Are you lazy, stupid, or both?

Just as I thought, no supporting data, just lame insults. But you keep on being a gigantic, hysterical bore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

The Salvadorans came here in 2001 on protected status. Temporary. How many Presidential terms later is it still the same situation? Now the 5th and the 3rd president?

Why call it temporary? If a diplomat is here or some such special visa their children DO NOT get to be US citizens so why did children of these temporary US residents?
[Vienna, Tysons, etc].

Children of diplomats are in fact eligible for green cards.

Children of diplomats [here temporarily] do not get birthright citizenship and neither should other children born in the US to those here on a temporary basis or born to non-citizens.