You may not agree with Trump but he means business

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A bunch of Democrats from mainly blue states want to provide amnesty or continued protection. What a surprise!

When will you guys learn that much of America does not give a crap when it comes to the nonsensical policies that liberals espouse?

lol.. you completely ignored the "bipartisan" part. Selective reading? LOL Let me bold it for you.

Very bipartisan ...... here is the list How many Republicans do you see in the list?

Representatives Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Don Beyer, Jr. (D-VA), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Joe Crowley (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), Darren Soto (D-FL), Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), André Carson (D-IN), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), John Lewis (D-GA), Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NJ), Tony Cárdenas (D-CA), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Val Demings (D-FL), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), José Serrano (D-NY), Beto O’Rourke (D-TX), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Anthony Brown (D-MD), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Bobby Rush (D-IL), John Yarmuth (D-KY), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Bradley Schneider (D-IL), Ruben Kihuen (D-NV), Adam Smith (D-WA), Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Mark Pocan (D-WI), David Cicilline (D-RI), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Richard Neal (D-MA), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Peter Welch (D-VT), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Bill Keating (D-MA), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Jared Polis (D-CO), Rick Larsen (D-WA), David Price (NC), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Ann Kuster (D-NH), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Danny K. Davis (D-IL), Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Dina Titus (D-NV), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Hank Johnson, Jr. (D-GA), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Dwight Evans (D-PA), Bill Foster (D-IL), Joe Kennedy (D-MA), Filemon Vela (D-TX), Katherine Clark (D-MA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), John Delaney (D-MD), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Gerald Connolly (D-VA), Lois, Frankel (D-FL), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI), Al Lawson, Jr. (D-FL), and Nita M. Lowey (D-NY).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Children born here are US Citizens. Sorry if you don’t respect the Constitution, but that’s what it says. Their parents don’t have to be US citizens. The children are. You can stomp your feet all you want about all these people in their 20s and 30s having children, but it happens. Your plan to crew US children because you don’t like their parents is just stupid.

[Anonymous]

*screw not crew

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Children born here are US Citizens. Sorry if you don’t respect the Constitution, but that’s what it says. Their parents don’t have to be US citizens. The children are. You can stomp your feet all you want about all these people in their 20s and 30s having children, but it happens. Your plan to crew US children because you don’t like their parents is just stupid.

See, this is why we people vote for Trump. “Screw” the parents?? I thought we actually provided them an enormously generous opportunity by allowing them to come to America to live and work on a temporary basis. And this is now what we’re told. That because we won’t change the rules and allow them to stay forever, we are “screwing” them.

The fact is, we’d be told we are evil bigots no matter what we did. If we didn’t support the TPS program in the first place, we’d have no heart. If we wanted to end it after five years, that would be way too soon and we’d be heartless. How about telling the temporary immigrants that they can’t have children here to avoid the problem of separating them from their citizen children? Of course not - that would be bigoted. There is no winning with liberals. You give them an inch, they demand a mile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Somehow, I just know you're not eligible for DAR yourself. In fact, if your people were here before the 1960s I'd be surprised.

It is the trend I've noticed: always the children of recent immigrants--maybe insecure about their cultural status as Americans--who are so rabidly anti-immigration for everyone now that they've got theirs. My theory? Your parents brought some pretty ugly nationalist baggage with them from the old country and raised you wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Somehow, I just know you're not eligible for DAR yourself. In fact, if your people were here before the 1960s I'd be surprised.

It is the trend I've noticed: always the children of recent immigrants--maybe insecure about their cultural status as Americans--who are so rabidly anti-immigration for everyone now that they've got theirs. My theory? Your parents brought some pretty ugly nationalist baggage with them from the old country and raised you wrong.

Wait so you just entirely make something up about another poster that you have no idea whether or not is true and use that as a basis for your argument?

[Anonymous]

''So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.''

Great point, you nailed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Somehow, I just know you're not eligible for DAR yourself. In fact, if your people were here before the 1960s I'd be surprised.

It is the trend I've noticed: always the children of recent immigrants--maybe insecure about their cultural status as Americans--who are so rabidly anti-immigration for everyone now that they've got theirs. My theory? Your parents brought some pretty ugly nationalist baggage with them from the old country and raised you wrong.

Wait so you just entirely make something up about another poster that you have no idea whether or not is true and use that as a basis for your argument?

But it is true, isn't it?

Always so insecure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people have been here a long time. No new people are getting TPS, the have to have been here when the program was open.

They have to apply and pay to stay every 18 months and they can’t have criminal records. Many of them now have US citizen children. Deporting the parent of a US Citizens is bad policy. Often time the family that stays ends up going on public assistance. Most people understand all this. Stephen Miller does not. It’ bad for the families. It’s bad for state welfare programs. It’s bad for the community. But it makes some heartless non-thinking people think they are “winning”somehow.

So wait. We have another crop of anchor babies from these "temporarily protected" illegal immigrants? Great.

And this bit about "deporting the parents of a U.S. Citizen"? Great way to spin it. Come into the country illegally, drop an anchor baby or two. and then cry how bad it is to deport parents of American citizens.

Somehow, I just know you're not eligible for DAR yourself. In fact, if your people were here before the 1960s I'd be surprised.

It is the trend I've noticed: always the children of recent immigrants--maybe insecure about their cultural status as Americans--who are so rabidly anti-immigration for everyone now that they've got theirs. My theory? Your parents brought some pretty ugly nationalist baggage with them from the old country and raised you wrong.

Wait so you just entirely make something up about another poster that you have no idea whether or not is true and use that as a basis for your argument?

But it is true, isn't it?

Always so insecure.

How in the world would I know whether or not he or she is eligible for DAR or when his/her family arrived? Did you eat paint chips for lunch or something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A bunch of Democrats from mainly blue states want to provide amnesty or continued protection. What a surprise!

When will you guys learn that much of America does not give a crap when it comes to the nonsensical policies that liberals espouse?

lol.. you completely ignored the "bipartisan" part. Selective reading? LOL Let me bold it for you.

Very bipartisan ...... here is the list How many Republicans do you see in the list?

Representatives Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Don Beyer, Jr. (D-VA), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Joe Crowley (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), Darren Soto (D-FL), Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), André Carson (D-IN), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), John Lewis (D-GA), Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NJ), Tony Cárdenas (D-CA), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Val Demings (D-FL), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), José Serrano (D-NY), Beto O’Rourke (D-TX), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Anthony Brown (D-MD), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Bobby Rush (D-IL), John Yarmuth (D-KY), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Bradley Schneider (D-IL), Ruben Kihuen (D-NV), Adam Smith (D-WA), Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Mark Pocan (D-WI), David Cicilline (D-RI), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Richard Neal (D-MA), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Peter Welch (D-VT), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Bill Keating (D-MA), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Jared Polis (D-CO), Rick Larsen (D-WA), David Price (NC), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Ann Kuster (D-NH), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Danny K. Davis (D-IL), Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Dina Titus (D-NV), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Hank Johnson, Jr. (D-GA), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Dwight Evans (D-PA), Bill Foster (D-IL), Joe Kennedy (D-MA), Filemon Vela (D-TX), Katherine Clark (D-MA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), John Delaney (D-MD), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Gerald Connolly (D-VA), Lois, Frankel (D-FL), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI), Al Lawson, Jr. (D-FL), and Nita M. Lowey (D-NY).

I see a few Rs. I don't think it has to be 50/50 to be bipartisan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A bunch of Democrats from mainly blue states want to provide amnesty or continued protection. What a surprise!

When will you guys learn that much of America does not give a crap when it comes to the nonsensical policies that liberals espouse?

lol.. you completely ignored the "bipartisan" part. Selective reading? LOL Let me bold it for you.

Very bipartisan ...... here is the list How many Republicans do you see in the list?

Representatives Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Don Beyer, Jr. (D-VA), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Joe Crowley (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), Darren Soto (D-FL), Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), André Carson (D-IN), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), John Lewis (D-GA), Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NJ), Tony Cárdenas (D-CA), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Val Demings (D-FL), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), José Serrano (D-NY), Beto O’Rourke (D-TX), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Anthony Brown (D-MD), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Bobby Rush (D-IL), John Yarmuth (D-KY), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Bradley Schneider (D-IL), Ruben Kihuen (D-NV), Adam Smith (D-WA), Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Mark Pocan (D-WI), David Cicilline (D-RI), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Richard Neal (D-MA), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Peter Welch (D-VT), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Bill Keating (D-MA), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Jared Polis (D-CO), Rick Larsen (D-WA), David Price (NC), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Ann Kuster (D-NH), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Danny K. Davis (D-IL), Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Dina Titus (D-NV), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Hank Johnson, Jr. (D-GA), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Dwight Evans (D-PA), Bill Foster (D-IL), Joe Kennedy (D-MA), Filemon Vela (D-TX), Katherine Clark (D-MA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), John Delaney (D-MD), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Gerald Connolly (D-VA), Lois, Frankel (D-FL), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI), Al Lawson, Jr. (D-FL), and Nita M. Lowey (D-NY).

I see a few Rs. I don't think it has to be 50/50 to be bipartisan.

LMAO. There are literally two Rs. I guess that’s bipartisan!

[Anonymous]

OK Vladimir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He means business so long as he gets to grab women, continue his grifter ways and be a racist ahole. Way to go Trumpsters!

Please- women have been throwing themselves at trump for decades!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. They've lived here under "temporary" status, and 15 years is beyond temporary.

Being generous is being great, no? That's what the Bible teaches. You must read the Trumpian Bible.

Great idea. We should throw open the borders to anyone and everyone who wants to come to America. That would be the “generous” thing to do after all.

Yup. It's the liberal way. To each according to his needs, no matter what.

That is exactly what the first church did. Do Christian churches no longer read from Acts? What happened to the party of Christian values? Does it only apply to real Americans?

Acts 2:45

45They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.

Acts 4

32All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. 33With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all 34that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales 35and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.

...we don’t live in a theocracy.

If that’s what you want, I hear Iran Saudi Arabia are nice.

Then those so called Christian Rs should keep their "theocracy" out of the government. It works both ways. I've said it before, those evangelical R voters are the opposite sides of the same coin as the hardline Muslims who want their sharia law to be the law of the land. And they should surely stop calling themselves the party of Christian and family values.

From what I see and hear, the Dems actually practice most of the Christian teachings without labeling themselves as Christians, whereas the Rs are just full of hot air about Christian values, but when it comes to actually practicing it not just in their private lives but in how they vote and what policies they support, it's just all talk and no action.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A bunch of Democrats from mainly blue states want to provide amnesty or continued protection. What a surprise!

When will you guys learn that much of America does not give a crap when it comes to the nonsensical policies that liberals espouse?

lol.. you completely ignored the "bipartisan" part. Selective reading? LOL Let me bold it for you.

Very bipartisan ...... here is the list How many Republicans do you see in the list?

Representatives Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Don Beyer, Jr. (D-VA), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Joe Crowley (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), Darren Soto (D-FL), Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), André Carson (D-IN), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), John Lewis (D-GA), Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NJ), Tony Cárdenas (D-CA), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Val Demings (D-FL), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), José Serrano (D-NY), Beto O’Rourke (D-TX), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Anthony Brown (D-MD), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Bobby Rush (D-IL), John Yarmuth (D-KY), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Bradley Schneider (D-IL), Ruben Kihuen (D-NV), Adam Smith (D-WA), Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Mark Pocan (D-WI), David Cicilline (D-RI), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Richard Neal (D-MA), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Peter Welch (D-VT), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Bill Keating (D-MA), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Jared Polis (D-CO), Rick Larsen (D-WA), David Price (NC), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Ann Kuster (D-NH), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Danny K. Davis (D-IL), Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Dina Titus (D-NV), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Hank Johnson, Jr. (D-GA), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Dwight Evans (D-PA), Bill Foster (D-IL), Joe Kennedy (D-MA), Filemon Vela (D-TX), Katherine Clark (D-MA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), John Delaney (D-MD), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Gerald Connolly (D-VA), Lois, Frankel (D-FL), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI), Al Lawson, Jr. (D-FL), and Nita M. Lowey (D-NY).

I see a few Rs. I don't think it has to be 50/50 to be bipartisan.

LMAO. There are literally two Rs. I guess that’s bipartisan!

If it has R support, then yep, it's called bipartisan.