Wrong. Because there 6% of Wooten is black and 7% is Hispanic so Wooten is far more than biracial. Why don't you tell those students that they need to classify themselves as White or Asian because you've decided that nearly 15% of the school population is "insignificant" according to your narrow definition. |
I'm a NP, and I'm from New York, and I don't get your "common sense reasoning." There's incredible diversity within the Asian population--which MCPS classifies as students with origins from the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. They are not white people with yellowish or brownish skin. Wooton to me is diverse, certainly much more so than Whitman. |
PP here. I am actually Asian. Read through the post. In education, diversity does not mean cultural diversity. It means racial diversity. So yes, while there are variations within the Asian continent, in terms of a race, they are considered "Asian" - one race. What you are referring to is ethnicity. Not the same as racial diversity, which again, is what most people consider when speaking of diversity. Again, Wootton is not a diverse HS in MCPS. Certainly, it is more diverse than Whitman, but it's still not considered a diverse school. Stop trying so hard. |
NP here and I agree with you. |
Maybe Wooten is diverse, but Wootton isn't. I could restate it as largely biracial. 6% and 7% are barely above the reportable minimum of 5%. These numbers are not at all representative of the diversity of the county as a whole. I remain correct. |
In the book of diversity, is it specifically written that Wooton is not diverse? Not sure why you're trying to impose your opinions on others when there are clearly many posters who do not agree with you. |
+100 I agree completely. Wootton is not racially diverse. |
+1 A school with those figures is diverse in my opinion. Others may disagree with me, but unlike the PP who thinks that anyone who doesn't agree with her is from Iowa, I don't force my views on others--perhaps because I benefitted from attending a diverse school like Wootton. |
Again, within MCPS, most would not consider Wootton to be a diverse school. I don't care if you personally think it is. You can go on living in your bubble. But by no measure would anyone with common sense consider Wootton to be a diverse school in MCPS. Even niche ranking doesn't consider Wootton to be diverse. https://www.niche.com/k12/rankings/public-high-schools/most-diverse/s/maryland/ RM is #12; Wootton #92. Sure, it's more diverse than Whitman, but Wootton is not considered a diverse school. |
+1 Wootton is diverse, having a population that is majority non-white. |
SMH... that doesn't make it diverse. A HS with 90% Hispanics is also not considered diverse. A HS with 80% Asian is not diverse, either. Racial diversity = as close to 25% of each racial category. |
There is a difference in my mind between major hardship and significant expense. Say you make $1M+ a year-tuition is practically an afterthought and really shouldn't impact what else you can do. Conversely, say you mak $250K. Tuition, especially for more than one kid, is going to be a major hardship (absent significant aid) that will likely require cutting back on retirement, vacations, mortgage amounts, etc. To make it work, it would have to be your number one priority financially. But say you make 5-700k. You could afford to send 2 kids to private school and still save for retirement, vacation, etc. But, the ~$80k in tuition isn't irrelevant to your overall finances. It may impact how much you are saving outside of retirement, cut back a bit on vacation or car expenses, etc. Don't get me wrong, you should still have enough to live a very nice life after tuition payments, which is why I don't think they require a major hardship at that level. But you aren't wealthy enough that $80k after taxes each year for 12 years won't have an impact on your finances such that you have to think about whether private is worth it, particularly given the excellent public options. |
Could it be [shock] perhaps that people have different definitions as to what constitutes racial diversity? |
Not possible. Per the insistent poster above, anyone who does not agree with her definition of diversity lacks common sense or is from Iowa. |
It's a normative term. Maybe to you 99% white and 1% not white is doversirty. That doesn't mean you are right |