| ^ Different folks have different debt tolerances. We paid off our home in 3 years. Mathematically, would it have been more profitable to have stretched it out to 30 and invested the difference? Probably. But we wanted the mortgage gone, and we've got no regrets. |
Logical result of the constant emasculation of boys in schools. They are taught that every male urge they have is wrong and to be suppressed - so, now we have 29 year olds living with Mom with no job or wife/girlfriend, and no desire for either. Sad really. |
+1000 and that boomer giving that millennial the lifestyle where spending was part of everyday life. And the parent not wanting their child to live in a "dangerous" neighborhood. |
+1. Doing the same thing. You cannot replace the security of being debt free. It is not the best move financially, but it has it's own psychic benefit. |
Better yet, let's talk in 5 years. 6% may be too low an estimate but I like to be conservative. But if you really think that way, you ought to pull all that money out of the stock market and buy some gold from William Devane. |
But doesn't this impact your tax rate? Doesn't it help to have the mortgage interest tax deduction? |
Oh, come one. That's a change that happened over 25 years. You're saying no one saw it coming? |
The reduction was less than the interest, if I recall correctly. |
I wish I had $1 for every time I've pointed out that you pay $1 for 30 cents in mortgage tax deduction. Stupid. |
If the stock market averages 6% per year over the next 5 years, I will pull all my money out and give it to you. |
+1. So financially illiterate. An interest deduction is great when you have no choice but to incur the expense of paying interest, like when you take a mortgage to buy a house. Interest is still an expense you pay, real $ going out to the bank. The deduction helps soften the blow, but ideally you don't have the expense at all. |
Right. 6% is such an inflated annualized return. How about this: I am confident that my 35k will have grown to more than 38k in 5 years. If so, my choice paid off. Yes there's risk that I could lose money or be flat in 5 years - the market is risky. I'm willing to take that chance on a relatively small amount of money. When did you purchase your two homes? I can nearly guarantee you you'd have been better off paying the minimum on a loan at 4-5% and investing the difference in an s&p index fund |
| I think here in DC, a lot of these Union Market-shopping hipsters having their parents footing the bills. I went to college in DC and many of my classmates still, at 30+, have parents paying their rent so that they can "afford" to work at non-profits for not much money and use what they do make as play money for international trips. It's pretty common, actually. |
28 years old and I agree. And tbh, I don't think it's that bad of a plan. That's exactly how the rich get richer. I have several friends who's parents allowed them to take unpaid internships that have turned into prestigious, high paying jobs at Vogue, Conde Nast, etc. I also have a friend who's parents' bankrolled a fashion line for her which has been successful and has expanded into multiple cities. I understand the jealousy, because I've felt it myself. But I mean- it makes good sense. |
|
OP, why were you at Union Market? Just to see a new place, have a nice little outing maybe? Has it occurred to you that the people you see there perhaps also just go occasionally, as a treat? You might have seen me there having a $5 coffee and a $12 poke bowl, I've done that. Twice in all the years Union Market has been open.
You might even have lumped me in with "the Millenials" you disparage, I am that age. However, what you don't know is that I am married, have a kid, earn a reasonable living as does my spouse, am a homeowner (haven't lived in my parents home since I was 22!), and even paid off my student loans this year! So don't fret too much about my choices or financial well being, I'm doing just fine. |