Firebomed HQ complete with Nazi symbol!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That area is 5 to 1 registered Democrat.
It's a hate-fest mecca. They don't need
to be shy about torching their victims.

\

This trolling is so tiresome. We all know that your candidate is the one advocating and condoning violence. We know who promotes hate. We know whose followers are talking about armed insurrection.

We all know that "hate" is a Republican family value. You can keep holding your ears and pretending it's not so, but the rest of us live in the real world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want Hillary to start being truthful.
Why is that too much to ask of her?

Trump lies at least 4 times as much as Hillary. Why is that too much for you to understand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another example of how dangerous liberals are. When will the madness stop?

Another example of how dangerous Trump is. When will the madness stop?

Was Trump in Orange Co, NC on Saturday?

Right. When Trump supporters firebomb DNC headquarters, then we can talk. In the meantime please admit your side is wrong and inciting violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another example of how dangerous liberals are. When will the madness stop?

Another example of how dangerous Trump is. When will the madness stop?

Was Trump in Orange Co, NC on Saturday?

Right. When Trump supporters firebomb DNC headquarters, then we can talk. In the meantime please admit your side is wrong and inciting violence.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another example of how dangerous liberals are. When will the madness stop?

Another example of how dangerous Drumpf is. When will the madness stop?

Was Drumpf in Orange Co, NC on Saturday?

Right. When Drumpf supporters firebomb DNC headquarters, then we can talk. In the meantime please admit your side is wrong and inciting violence.

Exactly.

Republican offices get bombed and Republicans blame all Democrats. Democrats respond by condemning (whoever did it) and starting a go-fund-me to rebuild. See the difference in basic principles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillsborough is NOT near Charlotte. This was down the road from Chapel Hill and Carboro, in Orange County, which is an EXTREMELY liberal part of the state. I am very surprised they would have headquarters there. I used to live there. It is not typical of the type of people who live there to do this.

Yes, I am OP and I made a mistake when I said Charlotte. It is indeed Chapel Hill. So can we all get back to firebombing is nasty business?

Well you made it a point that it was in Charlotte "no less". Not sure if you emphasized that because of the recent riots there, or what, but don't get upset when you are called out on that. I don't think anyone, conservative or liberal, will think firebombing is a good idea or justified. But it is very relevant that the location is in Hillsborough, because it is a very laid back community, like Del Ray in Alexandria, so I highly doubt it was local people and I am not surprised that local democrats have helped the RNC office staff in raising money and in man power by cleaning up with them. That's the kind of place Hillsborough is.

Upset? not at all. Just think it's weird that place makes a difference. It was in the Charlotte Observer and I'm not very familiar with NC localities. It was my mistake.

I'm sorry, after the vid broke yesterday by O'Keefe implicating the Hillary campaign with deliberately inciting violence (part 2 out today), this is no longer even a discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they find the crackpot(s) who did this soon so we can hold them accountable rather than passing blame back and forth.

I appreciate the Democrats that stepped up and donated as that is the party I am proud to be apart of.

Let's all try to exemplify the best of our political parties, rather than our worst. And when members of our parties act in hateful and shameful ways we can be quick to denounce those actions for what they are...which is an affront to democracy.

If Trump had your fair and impartial approach during this election process, he would've been the next president. If he had supported all Americans even those he disagreed with, he would've been the next president. If he had acted presidential instead of dictatorial, he would've been the next president. If Trump had praised women and their accomplishments, apologized sincerely for past indiscretions, and ceased tearing down the democratic voting system, I myself might have voted for him.

Even if he were to do all these things now, too little too late.

No, he would not be. Romney was about a fair as it got - and Reid deliberately lied to keep him out of office, knowing a complicit media would follow suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn Trumpsters! In Charlotte no less!!!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article108627627.html

Why do you say, “Damn Trumpsters?”

Because Trump supporters are supposed to be the Nazis according to liberals. Entire thread on it re: alt-right

And here you a Republican campaign office firebombed and Nazi symbols and slurs written on it. According to liberals, they don't behave like this.

Oh puh-lease, you are obsessed with liberals like they're all the same and live to make you miserable. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.

This firebombing was horrible and everyone should condemn it.

I don't feel sorry for myself. I feel sorry for liberals, actually, because they can't see clearly what I and 'the other deplorables' can. No worries, they will pay for it. But at that point? I won't have much compassion for them.

Still clearly obsessed with liberals, aren't you? You are unable to see people as individuals but would prefer to smear an entire group of people based on the demographic group they belong to. This is a problem with your ability to think critically - not a problem with conservatives, Republicans, or Trump supporters but a problem with you.

Trumpanzees much? Deplorables?

Wrong again. I haven't used that language at all but you want to smear me with it because someone else you didn't like said it. As I said, this error in judgment is on you, no one else.

Are you a liberal? Progressive? Democrat? Or just a sensitive Sally?

Here's the thing - if you vote for Hillary Clinton, it is my opinion that you will be bringing down a fury on this country you cannot even dream of. Take a look at what's going in in Europe right now. You have liberal groups who supported the migrants now admitting they made a dreadful mistake, due to the violence they've seen. We have Podesta and other democrats saying that by signing the Iran deal, they have signed onto nuclear war in the Middle East and relegated us to cleaning it up. All you have to do is look through the Wikileaks dumps to see their opinions in their own words. Instead, the narrative has become 'it's illegal to look at Wikileaks' by some of the media.

I am not into sacrificing American lies on the alter of globalism. Are you?

You want to talk issues, that's fine. But if you're the pp I was responding to, I was objecting to you smearing every liberal based on an egregious act that one or a handful of (perhaps) liberals have committed. Therefore I'm accusing you and no one else of lazy thinking when you do that - because this kind of lazy thinking is not a liberal or conservative thing, it's a problem with individual perception.

I don't care, frankly. We just saw yesterday how dirty the game is in the HRC campaign. ON TAPE, saying that "It's hard to get Republicans going at the rallies because they tend to follow the rules". If you think I'm not talking about you, then I probably am not. But if you watch that O'Keefe tape (and the second that comes out today) and still vote Clinton, knowing how that campaign behaved - with her approval? I don't think much of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That area is 5 to 1 registered Democrat.
It's a hate-fest mecca. They don't need
to be shy about torching their victims.

\

This trolling is so tiresome. We all know that your candidate is the one advocating and condoning violence. We know who promotes hate. We know whose followers are talking about armed insurrection.

We all know that "hate" is a Republican family value. You can keep holding your ears and pretending it's not so, but the rest of us live in the real world.

Do we? Because evidence shows otherwise - on video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want Hillary to start being truthful.
Why is that too much to ask of her?

Trump lies at least 4 times as much as Hillary. Why is that too much for you to understand?

Says who? The biased fact-checkers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn Trumpsters! In Charlotte no less!!!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article108627627.html

Why do you say, “Damn Trumpsters?”

Because Trump supporters are supposed to be the Nazis according to liberals. Entire thread on it re: alt-right

And here you a Republican campaign office firebombed and Nazi symbols and slurs written on it. According to liberals, they don't behave like this.

Oh puh-lease, you are obsessed with liberals like they're all the same and live to make you miserable. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.

This firebombing was horrible and everyone should condemn it.

I don't feel sorry for myself. I feel sorry for liberals, actually, because they can't see clearly what I and 'the other deplorables' can. No worries, they will pay for it. But at that point? I won't have much compassion for them.

Still clearly obsessed with liberals, aren't you? You are unable to see people as individuals but would prefer to smear an entire group of people based on the demographic group they belong to. This is a problem with your ability to think critically - not a problem with conservatives, Republicans, or Trump supporters but a problem with you.

Trumpanzees much? Deplorables?

Wrong again. I haven't used that language at all but you want to smear me with it because someone else you didn't like said it. As I said, this error in judgment is on you, no one else.

Are you a liberal? Progressive? Democrat? Or just a sensitive Sally?

Here's the thing - if you vote for Hillary Clinton, it is my opinion that you will be bringing down a fury on this country you cannot even dream of. Take a look at what's going in in Europe right now. You have liberal groups who supported the migrants now admitting they made a dreadful mistake, due to the violence they've seen. We have Podesta and other democrats saying that by signing the Iran deal, they have signed onto nuclear war in the Middle East and relegated us to cleaning it up. All you have to do is look through the Wikileaks dumps to see their opinions in their own words. Instead, the narrative has become 'it's illegal to look at Wikileaks' by some of the media.

I am not into sacrificing American lies on the alter of globalism. Are you?

You want to talk issues, that's fine. But if you're the pp I was responding to, I was objecting to you smearing every liberal based on an egregious act that one or a handful of (perhaps) liberals have committed. Therefore I'm accusing you and no one else of lazy thinking when you do that - because this kind of lazy thinking is not a liberal or conservative thing, it's a problem with individual perception.

I don't care, frankly. We just saw yesterday how dirty the game is in the HRC campaign. ON TAPE, saying that "It's hard to get Republicans going at the rallies because they tend to follow the rules". If you think I'm not talking about you, then I probably am not. But if you watch that O'Keefe tape (and the second that comes out today) and still vote Clinton, knowing how that campaign behaved - with her approval? I don't think much of you.

I didn't hear about that. (I was too focused on the bribe that State was offering the FBI to remove classified markings.) so you're saying that the Clinton campaign was trying to incite Republicans? There is no depth too low for them.

As far as them acknowledging that Republicans obey the rules, reminds me of when I was working for a liberal organization. Everyone assumed I was a lib, also, and so this guy told me that he was sent to a Republican organization (for sales business) and he said he was amazed. He told me how much more polite and well-behaved they were in comparison to the Democrats. Sure, just his one experience....but interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn Trumpsters! In Charlotte no less!!!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article108627627.html

Why do you say, “Damn Trumpsters?”

Because Trump supporters are supposed to be the Nazis according to liberals. Entire thread on it re: alt-right

And here you a Republican campaign office firebombed and Nazi symbols and slurs written on it. According to liberals, they don't behave like this.

Oh puh-lease, you are obsessed with liberals like they're all the same and live to make you miserable. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.

This firebombing was horrible and everyone should condemn it.

I don't feel sorry for myself. I feel sorry for liberals, actually, because they can't see clearly what I and 'the other deplorables' can. No worries, they will pay for it. But at that point? I won't have much compassion for them.

Still clearly obsessed with liberals, aren't you? You are unable to see people as individuals but would prefer to smear an entire group of people based on the demographic group they belong to. This is a problem with your ability to think critically - not a problem with conservatives, Republicans, or Trump supporters but a problem with you.

Trumpanzees much? Deplorables?

Wrong again. I haven't used that language at all but you want to smear me with it because someone else you didn't like said it. As I said, this error in judgment is on you, no one else.

Are you a liberal? Progressive? Democrat? Or just a sensitive Sally?

Here's the thing - if you vote for Hillary Clinton, it is my opinion that you will be bringing down a fury on this country you cannot even dream of. Take a look at what's going in in Europe right now. You have liberal groups who supported the migrants now admitting they made a dreadful mistake, due to the violence they've seen. We have Podesta and other democrats saying that by signing the Iran deal, they have signed onto nuclear war in the Middle East and relegated us to cleaning it up. All you have to do is look through the Wikileaks dumps to see their opinions in their own words. Instead, the narrative has become 'it's illegal to look at Wikileaks' by some of the media.

I am not into sacrificing American lies on the alter of globalism. Are you?

You want to talk issues, that's fine. But if you're the pp I was responding to, I was objecting to you smearing every liberal based on an egregious act that one or a handful of (perhaps) liberals have committed. Therefore I'm accusing you and no one else of lazy thinking when you do that - because this kind of lazy thinking is not a liberal or conservative thing, it's a problem with individual perception.

I don't care, frankly. We just saw yesterday how dirty the game is in the HRC campaign. ON TAPE, saying that "It's hard to get Republicans going at the rallies because they tend to follow the rules". If you think I'm not talking about you, then I probably am not. But if you watch that O'Keefe tape (and the second that comes out today) and still vote Clinton, knowing how that campaign behaved - with her approval? I don't think much of you.

I didn't hear about that. (I was too focused on the bribe that State was offering the FBI to remove classified markings.) so you're saying that the Clinton campaign was trying to incite Republicans? There is no depth too low for them.

As far as them acknowledging that Republicans obey the rules, reminds me of when I was working for a liberal organization. Everyone assumed I was a lib, also, and so this guy told me that he was sent to a Republican organization (for sales business) and he said he was amazed. He told me how much more polite and well-behaved they were in comparison to the Democrats. Sure, just his one experience....but interesting.

You didn't hear about it because the mainstream isn't publishing the video. Matter of fact, Twitter tried to delete the entire account but the public overwhelmed them and they had to reinstate. Reddit kept deleting it from their pages as people put it up there. Amazing stuff. I suggest you watch the video and THEN we can continue the conversation. Unless they are expert ventriloquists, it's pretty damning.

Look, I like you. I think you are a reasonable individual. Understand that when people say libs, they referring to kneejerk progressive liberals, not folk like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn Trumpsters! In Charlotte no less!!!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article108627627.html

Why do you say, “Damn Trumpsters?”

Because Trump supporters are supposed to be the Nazis according to liberals. Entire thread on it re: alt-right

And here you a Republican campaign office firebombed and Nazi symbols and slurs written on it. According to liberals, they don't behave like this.

Oh puh-lease, you are obsessed with liberals like they're all the same and live to make you miserable. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.

This firebombing was horrible and everyone should condemn it.

I don't feel sorry for myself. I feel sorry for liberals, actually, because they can't see clearly what I and 'the other deplorables' can. No worries, they will pay for it. But at that point? I won't have much compassion for them.

Still clearly obsessed with liberals, aren't you? You are unable to see people as individuals but would prefer to smear an entire group of people based on the demographic group they belong to. This is a problem with your ability to think critically - not a problem with conservatives, Republicans, or Trump supporters but a problem with you.

Trumpanzees much? Deplorables?

Wrong again. I haven't used that language at all but you want to smear me with it because someone else you didn't like said it. As I said, this error in judgment is on you, no one else.

Are you a liberal? Progressive? Democrat? Or just a sensitive Sally?

Here's the thing - if you vote for Hillary Clinton, it is my opinion that you will be bringing down a fury on this country you cannot even dream of. Take a look at what's going in in Europe right now. You have liberal groups who supported the migrants now admitting they made a dreadful mistake, due to the violence they've seen. We have Podesta and other democrats saying that by signing the Iran deal, they have signed onto nuclear war in the Middle East and relegated us to cleaning it up. All you have to do is look through the Wikileaks dumps to see their opinions in their own words. Instead, the narrative has become 'it's illegal to look at Wikileaks' by some of the media.

I am not into sacrificing American lies on the alter of globalism. Are you?

You want to talk issues, that's fine. But if you're the pp I was responding to, I was objecting to you smearing every liberal based on an egregious act that one or a handful of (perhaps) liberals have committed. Therefore I'm accusing you and no one else of lazy thinking when you do that - because this kind of lazy thinking is not a liberal or conservative thing, it's a problem with individual perception.

I don't care, frankly. We just saw yesterday how dirty the game is in the HRC campaign. ON TAPE, saying that "It's hard to get Republicans going at the rallies because they tend to follow the rules". If you think I'm not talking about you, then I probably am not. But if you watch that O'Keefe tape (and the second that comes out today) and still vote Clinton, knowing how that campaign behaved - with her approval? I don't think much of you.

I didn't hear about that. (I was too focused on the bribe that State was offering the FBI to remove classified markings.) so you're saying that the Clinton campaign was trying to incite Republicans? There is no depth too low for them.

As far as them acknowledging that Republicans obey the rules, reminds me of when I was working for a liberal organization. Everyone assumed I was a lib, also, and so this guy told me that he was sent to a Republican organization (for sales business) and he said he was amazed. He told me how much more polite and well-behaved they were in comparison to the Democrats. Sure, just his one experience....but interesting.

I have been to Kerry and Bush rallies. The Bush supporters were much more polite, letting me and my short family stand ahead of them to see. The Kerry supporters routinely cut in front of me.

[Anonymous]

Did I read that this happened again? Indiana?

Terrorism tactics, for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want Hillary to start being truthful.
Why is that too much to ask of her?

Trump lies at least 4 times as much as Hillary. Why is that too much for you to understand?

Says who? The biased fact-checkers?

Yes, the facts according to George Soros!