The 'achievement gap' is a nation-wide, longstanding trend. It's why Atlanta just had an en masse cheating scandal. It's one of the reasons given for Cahill to be abruptly dismissed from Wilson. I am sure Latin is working on closing it - though have any schools in DC with the same SES diversity succeeded totally? |
Yeah, private schools have succeeded! |
Well said pp. Latin is a top notch school with a heart. |
Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please. |
Oh, then you right, Boss. Nobody has succeeded. |
Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that. |
I don't know the weighting, but the DCPCSB Tier system does take retention into account (the satisfaction component). |
Re enrollment is included, yes, but not mid year withdrawals ... those kids just disappear at no cost to the school's rating. And yes, I'm suggesting that the factors are weighted so that, on net, schools are rewarded for sloughing off poor students: they get up to 80 points based on the DC CAS (overall scores, median growth percentile, and "leading indicators," which is just a way of putting extra emphasis on the 8th grade math score). They can get only 10 points for reenrollment. (The last 10 points are attendance.) |
Inspired only has 3 years of testing, first of which was not officially counted. Give it time before you officially brand them permanent tier 2. I bet IT, CMI and MV will all obtain and keep tier 1 status. |
You're wrong, PP. The re-enrollment rate that the PCSB measures is the percentage of kids who were enrolled on count day last year who are enrolled on count day this year. Mid-year withdrawals hurt the re-enrollment rate. |
You're right! Good. It's still a winning strategy to drop a kid who is going to score basic or worse. A 1% reduction in reenrollment is more than offset, under the PCSB formula, by the increase in % of kids scoring proficient or advanced. |
just name me nasty Basis poster: since we have been competing with Washington Latin in Certamen (Latin) competitions, we have consistently beaten Washington Latin I don't think it is emphasis on Latin (although they did tell us it was their way of introducing English grammar, which at Basis is introduced as English grammar - master it or you are fucked) that is hurting Latin I would love to know what it is that is hurting Washington Latin |
I think Latin's "problem" is precisely that they don't going around telling adolescents to learn the material "or you are fucked." That's why parents choose it and that's why students stay, but it is also why its scores are not as high as they would appear if you erased 10% of the lowest-scoring students each year. |
The problem with Latin's scores is not that there are all those low-scoring students that they lovingly nurture and retain -- the problem is that the advanced students are sliding down to proficient. |
You are the "nasty BASIS poster." I and other BASIS parents have asked you to stop. This thread is about Latin - not what BASIS is doing. I think Latin is doing well on educating the whole child. BASIS pushes kids out - and the administration is about the dollars. Next you will be raving about the middle school science team which is composed of all 8th graders with no one else being allowed to compete. BASIS parent who does science projects at home because of the lack of experiments in the classroom. |