Why is Washington Latin MS now a Tier 2 school?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dramatic much? Catastrophic decline? Hardly.


The decline does look bad, PP.

The percentage of kids scoring Advanced in reading and math at Latin MS increased dramatically in 2010, but has been on the decline ever since.

What caused the large increase in 2010? Was there a surge in middle class enrollment for the 2009-2010 school year? Is that the year Deal stopped taking kids zoned for Hardy? Is there another reason?

Anyway, since 2010, the number of kids scoring Advanced at Latin MS has been on the decline. This decline is not due to the departure of bright kids, though, at least not entirely. The median growth percentile has also been on the decline at Latin MS since 2010:

Year -- Reading MGP -- Math MGP
2011 -- 63.5% -- 52.2%
2012 -- 56.9% -- 44.8%
2013 -- 46.0% -- 46.0%
2014 -- 42.8% -- 39.8%

The MGP data point to a multi-year trend of Advanced kids falling behind at Latin MS. Why is this happening?


I started this thread and I am not sending a kid to Hardy. I hope very much to get one kid into Latin.
But I am concerned.

What was really interesting is that all[b] of the tier I schools I looked at, including Deal, had this huge spike in scores in 2010. Then the question became who kept hold of it, who moved forward, and who sank back down.

I only looked at the Tier I schools so I am not sure if the spike was universal, but if you compare it to say Washington Latin High School, where when our oldest was considering Latin back in the dark ages we were warned that so many peeled off to privates in 9th it would not solve our financial problems, if you look at their graph, they are slow and steady improvement. Deal has that spike in 2010 and then stays in the stratosphere.

But no Tier I school falls back down. And I found the focus info on another thread. As the announcement said, x # of schools have been Tier I since they opened (Washington Latin MS included until now, the high school since it opened, maintaining its status and getting better every year as more people stay), and once these schools make it they don't tend to fall back down. There was some mention of EL Haynes on another thread having once been Tier I and now being Tier 2 but I can't find that info.

I think I have seen some of the nastiest snobbiest posts from Latin parents here in my entire time on DCUM and I find that very discouraging as well. Laughing at a parent who has sent children to both schools - are you kidding me?


Interesting "dark ages" comment. Not sure what the PP is referring too. However, around 2010 quite a few high SES AA parents stopped sending the sons to Latin and began not considering applying due to the stereotyping that was occurring at the school (including comments made by Board members). This community started looking at Deal for which we are inbound and other schools both private and charter. It has developed the reputation in this community as only being a school that you can send your child if you can be present in the school on a daily or almost constant basis.


dark ages = 2010, when everyone who applied could still get in to Latin but in talking to high SES parents they said that most of the kids in our group were still going private in 9th grade. We were looking for a solution for 4 kids all the way through, so that was not it. What is so interesting to me is how the popularity has skyrocketed and the kids staying for high school increased at the same time that Latin started absolutely failing its advanced kids - so they took a bunch of highly scoring kids, and moved them DOWN from advanced to proficient. And [b]these
are the kids moving on to high school now, where retaining them is such a feather in their cap.

Not AA, but I have heard the same thing about Washington Latin for AA kids much more recently than 2010 - no shade, just the unvarnished truth. That assumptions are being made and kids are being treated differently, and they certainly do not seem to be doing any better by their AA advanced kids - although I think the numbers kind of show you are correct perhaps, that high performing AA kids started going elsewhere. The AA population has decreased.

Latin allows you to helicopter parent your kid to the nth degree but you cannot change their color.

We do not have that problem (we are white), but had I sent my kid to Latin and watched their score go from advanced to proficient on the DC CAS I would have been pissed.

So we are back to the fundamental question, and all of us who are looking at Latin (some for the second time),
want to know what has happened at Washington Latin MS -

why was momentum lost, and why are they moving in the wrong direction - from advanced to proficient as opposed to the other way around. Especially those of us who have kids who have always scored advanced on the DC CAS since 3rd grade.

Washington Latin MS and HS were Tier I from the day they opened their doors (and that was a gradual process). They started in 2006 or 2007. I cannot begin to explain how atypical a progression this is for a charter school that everyone wants to get into NOW, including those charter schools that Latin would definitely consider "laughable" schools by comparison - like KIPP and DC PREP. All these Tier I schools - those that have been there from day I, and those that have just attained the status, show improvement - Latin MS is the only one going in the other direction:

hence the well deserved drop from Tier I to Tier II.
I challenge Washington Latin MS parents to find another school with a similar drop where it is "not a big deal"
whether it is just the pure descent on the FOCUS graphs or a Tier I to Tier II.
It is a big deal, and it makes a big difference to me.
Unlike all these trendy Charter schools that have only existed for a few years, Washington Latin has a long history.
And a lot of explaining to do if it wants to continue to recruit the right type of MS parents (academic, not racial)
WL MS parents - do your school a favor, raise a little bit of hell, even if you do it very very quietly. Your kids deserve it

Thanks for all the info -
I learned that the charter board evaluation system is actually fair, but that if you really want all the info from the day a school started, you don't go to the Charter Board, Learn DC, or OSSE - you go to Focus.

I am sorry if I sound old school - you can be loosey goosey in elementary school, because the kids who come from high SES backgrounds learn most of what they need to at home. Middle School is when the teachers are supposed to take over, find what sparks our kids intellectually and encourage them to run with it, and Latin on paper (meaning course descriptions, glossy fliers) still appears to be an intellectual paradise.

But the emperor has no clothes. Kudos to the Charter Board for calling them on it. I'm sure they got a lot of blow back. But the DC CAS scores over time tell us in no uncertain terms that they have been doing a disservice to their kids, especially the high performing ones. We have no more DC CAS.

But this is something I would like to see the administration of the MS address and explain because it does look bad
If they, like the Latin parents on this thread, consider themselves "above it" because of their waiting lists, I think they will be making a HUGE mistake short term as well as long term.....

These are objective statistics. Laugh all you want, but get to the bottom of it........



The 'achievement gap' is a nation-wide, longstanding trend. It's why Atlanta just had an en masse cheating scandal. It's one of the reasons given for Cahill to be abruptly dismissed from Wilson. I am sure Latin is working on closing it - though have any schools in DC with the same SES diversity succeeded totally?
Anonymous
Yeah, private schools have succeeded!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who mentioned above that only five new ninth-graders have been accepted through the lottery. I find some of the previous comments bizarrely hostile, particularly the very long one above. If you don't think WL is a good enough school, then it's very simple: don't apply there. We have close friends who have sent two kids to Latin--one is in MS now and one is in HS but started in the middle school. We have been following these students' work for a long time, as we think about various schools (DD is in third grade now so we'll enter the lottery next year). I can't explain test scores, but the actual academic work they are doing at Latin is top-notch; I've been impressed with what I've seen. So all you who "challenge" WL to explain why you should deign to apply there, please don't apply! That way people who really want to go there will have a better chance. I think there's a reason it has the waiting lists it does, and it isn't from resting on laurels. Fortunately, people who don't think Latin is good enough have other options, and isn't that the whole point?


Well said pp. Latin is a top notch school with a heart.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Oh, then you right, Boss. Nobody has succeeded.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that.


I don't know the weighting, but the DCPCSB Tier system does take retention into account (the satisfaction component).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that.


I don't know the weighting, but the DCPCSB Tier system does take retention into account (the satisfaction component).


Re enrollment is included, yes, but not mid year withdrawals ... those kids just disappear at no cost to the school's rating. And yes, I'm suggesting that the factors are weighted so that, on net, schools are rewarded for sloughing off poor students: they get up to 80 points based on the DC CAS (overall scores, median growth percentile, and "leading indicators," which is just a way of putting extra emphasis on the 8th grade math score). They can get only 10 points for reenrollment. (The last 10 points are attendance.)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Actually, I was surprised at how few Tier 1 schools there are, at least among the DCUM favorites. Two Rivers, Capital City, YY, LAMB, and BASIS are the only ones, I think. E.L. Haynes, Stokes, Latin and Inspired Teaching are all Tier 2. (I know MV, CMI, Bridges and Lee are yet to be ranked.)


Agree. FWIW Cap City elementary and middle were both Tier 2 in 2014. HS was Tier 1.


Inspired only has 3 years of testing, first of which was not officially counted. Give it time before you officially brand them permanent tier 2. I bet IT, CMI and MV will all obtain and keep tier 1 status.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that.


I don't know the weighting, but the DCPCSB Tier system does take retention into account (the satisfaction component).


Re enrollment is included, yes, but not mid year withdrawals ... those kids just disappear at no cost to the school's rating. And yes, I'm suggesting that the factors are weighted so that, on net, schools are rewarded for sloughing off poor students: they get up to 80 points based on the DC CAS (overall scores, median growth percentile, and "leading indicators," which is just a way of putting extra emphasis on the 8th grade math score). They can get only 10 points for reenrollment. (The last 10 points are attendance.)


You're wrong, PP. The re-enrollment rate that the PCSB measures is the percentage of kids who were enrolled on count day last year who are enrolled on count day this year. Mid-year withdrawals hurt the re-enrollment rate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, private schools have succeeded!


Prescreening your test takers is not succeeding in closing the achievement gap. Please.


Speaking of pre screening your test takers ... one big difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charter middle schools is that nearly every kid Latin enrolls in 5th grade is still enrolled at Latin in 8th grade. The most "successful" charters suffer a rate of attrition that, at a private school, would be shocking. Maybe the difference between Latin and the Tier 1 charters is simply that Latin keeps the bottom quarter of its class around - and the PCSB rating system doesn't give much credit for that.


I don't know the weighting, but the DCPCSB Tier system does take retention into account (the satisfaction component).


Re enrollment is included, yes, but not mid year withdrawals ... those kids just disappear at no cost to the school's rating. And yes, I'm suggesting that the factors are weighted so that, on net, schools are rewarded for sloughing off poor students: they get up to 80 points based on the DC CAS (overall scores, median growth percentile, and "leading indicators," which is just a way of putting extra emphasis on the 8th grade math score). They can get only 10 points for reenrollment. (The last 10 points are attendance.)


You're wrong, PP. The re-enrollment rate that the PCSB measures is the percentage of kids who were enrolled on count day last year who are enrolled on count day this year. Mid-year withdrawals hurt the re-enrollment rate.


You're right! Good.

It's still a winning strategy to drop a kid who is going to score basic or worse. A 1% reduction in reenrollment is more than offset, under the PCSB formula, by the increase in % of kids scoring proficient or advanced.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Basis opened in 2012 and attracted many high performing kids who would have otherwise gone to Latin. Could this account for some of the decline observed at Latin?


I have been wondering if it is not the Latin curriculum itself, time spent learning Latin (which I figured would help my kid's SATs) taking away from working towards advanced status in math and reading? I'm concerned because I have 2 kids I wish could go there, but while one is a star student the other is not. I need a school that can handle both types


just name me nasty Basis poster: since we have been competing with Washington Latin in Certamen (Latin) competitions, we have consistently beaten Washington Latin

I don't think it is emphasis on Latin (although they did tell us it was their way of introducing English grammar, which at Basis is introduced as English grammar - master it or you are fucked) that is hurting Latin

I would love to know what it is that is hurting Washington Latin
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Basis opened in 2012 and attracted many high performing kids who would have otherwise gone to Latin. Could this account for some of the decline observed at Latin?


I have been wondering if it is not the Latin curriculum itself, time spent learning Latin (which I figured would help my kid's SATs) taking away from working towards advanced status in math and reading? I'm concerned because I have 2 kids I wish could go there, but while one is a star student the other is not. I need a school that can handle both types


just name me nasty Basis poster: since we have been competing with Washington Latin in Certamen (Latin) competitions, we have consistently beaten Washington Latin

I don't think it is emphasis on Latin (although they did tell us it was their way of introducing English grammar, which at Basis is introduced as English grammar - master it or you are fucked) that is hurting Latin

I would love to know what it is that is hurting Washington Latin


I think Latin's "problem" is precisely that they don't going around telling adolescents to learn the material "or you are fucked." That's why parents choose it and that's why students stay, but it is also why its scores are not as high as they would appear if you erased 10% of the lowest-scoring students each year.
Anonymous
The problem with Latin's scores is not that there are all those low-scoring students that they lovingly nurture and retain -- the problem is that the advanced students are sliding down to proficient.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Basis opened in 2012 and attracted many high performing kids who would have otherwise gone to Latin. Could this account for some of the decline observed at Latin?


I have been wondering if it is not the Latin curriculum itself, time spent learning Latin (which I figured would help my kid's SATs) taking away from working towards advanced status in math and reading? I'm concerned because I have 2 kids I wish could go there, but while one is a star student the other is not. I need a school that can handle both types


just name me nasty Basis poster: since we have been competing with Washington Latin in Certamen (Latin) competitions, we have consistently beaten Washington Latin

I don't think it is emphasis on Latin (although they did tell us it was their way of introducing English grammar, which at Basis is introduced as English grammar - master it or you are fucked) that is hurting Latin

I would love to know what it is that is hurting Washington Latin


You are the "nasty BASIS poster." I and other BASIS parents have asked you to stop. This thread is about Latin - not what BASIS is doing. I think Latin is doing well on educating the whole child. BASIS pushes kids out - and the administration is about the dollars. Next you will be raving about the middle school science team which is composed of all 8th graders with no one else being allowed to compete.

BASIS parent who does science projects at home because of the lack of experiments in the classroom.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: