|
| I wouldnt, sometimes churches rely on volunteers and may not do background checks. no thanks.. |
This. No I wouldn't have left my child. I would have said thank you and left. |
| Ha. Ha ha. As a girl from Utah I find this thread so high class and appropriate. I could rely hear the bishops sermon over the 8 zillion kids in the room. Ya'll dont KNOW church |
Not the PP but I don't think it's pearl clutching or maybe you don't follow the news regarding the Catholic Church? |
+1 |
I would not feel comfortable leaving DC at a church's nursery. My MIL's church is like that and we never went there. |
What does any of this even mean? |
|
I assume that it means that PP (who is probably Mormon) thinks the idea of no kids in church is weird. |
It means not allowing kids in church is really bizarre |
|
I agree OP, not only would I have been utterly offended but what church is not welcoming of families? To the poster who suggested getting a babysitter, are you for real? As has been mentioned, churches and temples and every type of house of worship have declining membership. Attracting and maintaining young families is a huge focus for membership growth. Part of the reason we don't attend regular services are because of the timing and the fact that it would be both impractical and cost prohibitive for us to hire a babysitter for 3-4 hours every Friday night. While I agree there is a time and a place (i.e. maybe not in a bar on a Friday or Sat night) for children, weekly worship services most certainly ARE the time and the place. Once you become comfortable then leaving your child with volunteers seems appropriate but it should be at the parent's discretion.
Honestly, some of these posts make me very sad. When did children become a population that should be hidden away? How will they learn how to behave if they are not provided the opportunity to actually be in situations that require you to listen and behave? |