What is the most offensive bumper sticker you've ever seen?

[Anonymous]

I was in Shreveport, la last year and saw a bumper sticker on a pick-up truck that read "tie Obama here".

shock doesn't begin to describe what I felt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw one a few days ago, "somewhere in kenya a village is missing its idiot", which only served to prove the driver is an idiot, with no manners, class, or respect for the office of the president.

Bush is the one who started two wars and cut taxes, managing to kill people, destroy families, and tank our country's economy. But I would still never disrespect the president in a vulgar personal way like that.

I'm a liberal, and that's pretty funny. And before you get all exercised, bumper sticker, with Texas substituted for Kenya, was omnipresent during Bush's terms. Were you outraged then?

Not the PP who posted about the Kenya bumper sticker, but you ARE aware that Bush is from Texas and Obama is NOT from Kenya, right? The bumper sticker isn't offensive because it calls Obama the village idiot. It is offensive (and racist!) because it suggests Obama is from Kenya which, again, he is not!!!

Of course I'm aware of that. But that makes it even funnier (though unintentionally so).

Some of you need thicker skin. A few of these examples are truly offensive (the Calvin and Hobbs one, certainly) - many of the others are inaccurate, slightly meanspirited, and just do not comport with your own personal belief system. That does not mean they are offensive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was in Shreveport, la last year and saw a bumper sticker on a pick-up truck that read "tie Obama here".

shock doesn't begin to describe what I felt.

Yeah, THIS is offensive. Unlike many of the previous examples.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Hampden-Sydeny, where boys are men and girls are visitors."

(not that offensive but not appropriate in the parking deck of my law firm)

I don't get this one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Hampden-Sydeny, where boys are men and girls are visitors."

(not that offensive but not appropriate in the parking deck of my law firm)

I don't get this one?

I think it refers to the fact that it's a single-sex institution. And if that's the case, I'm not sure why it's either offensive or inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was in Shreveport, la last year and saw a bumper sticker on a pick-up truck that read "tie Obama here".

shock doesn't begin to describe what I felt.

OK that is the worst so far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I am so tired of Christians being hypocrites and then using "well we're all sinners" as some kind of a pass.

I'm so tired of liberals being hypocrites when they go on and on about one family (the Duggars) and give the mountains of Muslim families in NoVa a pass for each having at least 4-6 children. But overpopulation is only a Christian-blamed thing, apparently.

I am so tired of Christians like you thinking that liberals are the only ones who can't stand the Duggars.

But they're probably the only ones who simultaneously can't stand the Duggars and are absolutely forgiving in the many-child aspect to the Muslims. Period.

Who says they give Muslims a pass to have large families? Overpopulation is overpopulation.

[Anonymous]

I have no idea what Bible you are reading, no.idea.at.all!
You say all this, but I bet you do not tithe

>>>>>>>>>>>

Really? You have no idea in what Bible Jesus says, for example, to paraphrase, that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into heaven?

How about this: If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? (NIV, 1 John 3:17)
Or these? Luke 16:19-31, Proverbs 15:16-17, Ecclesiastes 5:10-12, Luke 1:52-53, 6:20, 6:24-25.


As for tithing, I AM NOT CHRISTIAN. I don't claim to be. And yet my actual behavior as regards charity seems to be more Christian that that of Christians. I give to a religious institution every month.... but it sure as hell ain't Christian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All bumper stickers are stupid but the most incredibly and disgustingly offensive are those having anything to do with Obama and Liberals.

But unlike liberals, I support their right to profess their love or hate for whatever they want - instead of... oh - scraping the bumper sticker off the car or defacing it in some other way which is something that only a liberal would do.

I had my Obama sticker defaced in New England. Do you think a liberal did that? You need to get around more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I have no idea what Bible you are reading, no.idea.at.all!
You say all this, but I bet you do not tithe

>>>>>>>>>>>

Really? You have no idea in what Bible Jesus says, for example, to paraphrase, that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into heaven?

How about this: If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? (NIV, 1 John 3:17)
Or these? Luke 16:19-31, Proverbs 15:16-17, Ecclesiastes 5:10-12, Luke 1:52-53, 6:20, 6:24-25.


As for tithing, I AM NOT CHRISTIAN. I don't claim to be. And yet my actual behavior as regards charity seems to be more Christian that that of Christians. I give to a religious institution every month.... but it sure as hell ain't Christian.

Ok if you are not a Christian -- not studying the Word in Spirit and in Truth -- then I would guess that you are not qualified to interpret Scripture.
By the way, the Scriptures you quoted do not mean we are not allowed or that it is sinful to have material possessions.
They mean material possessions should not have US.
We are to "...Seek ye first the Kingdom .."
And it is ridiculous to assume that someone who drives what YOU consider to be a luxury vehicle is not a "good" Christian or is not being 'charitable'.
You have no idea what you are talking about.

[Anonymous]

Beaver Eater

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fine hypocrisy offensive. So yes, a cross on a luxury vehicle seems offensive. What about Jesus' exhortations about wealth?

I find it offensive when someone is an A hole in traffic and then I see their religious stickers on the back of their car.

I would find it offensive if someone was driving a Hummer with an eco-type sticker on it.

This thread is why I don't put any bumper stickers on my car. People have enough reasons to be horrible in traffic, you don't need to give them another reason. And hate just seems to run so high these days.... yes PP, much higher than in Bush's terms.

My favorite was seeing a Clean Air type liberal bumper sticker and a Conserve Gas liberal bumper sticker...on a luxury SUV.

Oops...it was a luxury minivan.

Was it an alternative fuel or hybrid vehicle? I have a biodiesel SUV but most people don't know it unless they see me gas up.

I don't know? Does Lexus make a hybrid or alternative fuel minivan that doesn't have labeling as such on it? I've gotten used to all hybrids having either "Hybrid" or the green leaf on the car and alternative vehicles having labels such as "Flex Fuel" or something similar that I assume something without a label doesn't have those things.

Maybe the person driving a 1990 honda civic finds your "humble" 2003 toyota corolla as unchristian-like. Money is relative.

[Anonymous]

Gas, grass, or ass, nobody rides for free

[Anonymous]

It wasn't a bumper sticker, but last week I was behind an SUV that had a flag in the back window - the black flag of Jihad that Al Qaeda uses. I wan't offended, just flabbergasted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fine hypocrisy offensive. So yes, a cross on a luxury vehicle seems offensive. What about Jesus' exhortations about wealth?

I find it offensive when someone is an A hole in traffic and then I see their religious stickers on the back of their car.

I would find it offensive if someone was driving a Hummer with an eco-type sticker on it.

This thread is why I don't put any bumper stickers on my car. People have enough reasons to be horrible in traffic, you don't need to give them another reason. And hate just seems to run so high these days.... yes PP, much higher than in Bush's terms.

My favorite was seeing a Clean Air type liberal bumper sticker and a Conserve Gas liberal bumper sticker...on a luxury SUV.

Oops...it was a luxury minivan.

Was it an alternative fuel or hybrid vehicle? I have a biodiesel SUV but most people don't know it unless they see me gas up.

I don't know? Does Lexus make a hybrid or alternative fuel minivan that doesn't have labeling as such on it? I've gotten used to all hybrids having either "Hybrid" or the green leaf on the car and alternative vehicles having labels such as "Flex Fuel" or something similar that I assume something without a label doesn't have those things.

Maybe the person driving a 1990 honda civic finds your "humble" 2003 toyota corolla as unchristian-like. Money is relative.

This part of the conversation is not a part of the Christian debate going on above. It was only in response to the topic of hypocritical bumper stickers. In this case a person lobbying for and trying to convince others of clean air policies and gas conservation when driving a poor emission and gas guzzling minivan. Whether a person driving a 1990 honda civic finds my car un-Christian or not, I don't go around driving a vehicle that clearly violates the principles that I espouse on my bumper stickers.