One of the 3 Oklahoma thrill killers hates white people. How is this not a hate crime?

[Anonymous]

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

Liberal troll alert!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obama?

Welp, he did not say anything about the White man walking into the predominatly AA school with the AK-47 either. What do we make of that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

[Anonymous]

Or the right wing white terror plot up kidnap and kill police officers in Nevada.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so what exactly is the problem here?

are conservatives upset that this murder isnt getting justice cause the three guys were arrested? are we mad that there is a line of people supporting the killers (outside their family) and think the killing was justified? name them please because they are jackasses. are we mad that we think the three teenagers wont get a fair trial and will be set free, leaving millions of black men with the idea that they can kill a white person and get a pass?

let me know. all this entertaining your nonsense on a non story about who isnt saying what is absurd. there is no outrage here because the people who did the crime are caught, in jail, and hopefully rot in hell. what more do you want?

+1. I do not get the complaint either. I am AA. This murder was heinous and these three killers deserve whatever the justice system has in store for them. Far as I know, they were rounded up and arrested almost immediately and there has been substantial media coverage about them - and that coverage does NOT paint them as victims or symphathetic figures. Yet instead of mourning the loss of a young life, people are more worried about who said what and why. So....what I am missing?

I think the OP is asking the question is it a hate crime since one of the killers openly hates white people and then went and killed one for fun.

Ok. They charged 2 of the guys with 1st degree murder - which is the death penalty in OK and a "hate crime" is not an included lesser charge to 1st degree murder. So why is it so important that a lesser charge is thrown in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Well, in this particular case, the PP provided the primary historical document to refute the prior assertion and to support the PP's point. Instead of a well-reasoned factual rebuttal of the PP's post, the best the person could do was a dismissive non responsive answer. So it may just be a case of the old political adage that " Conservatives are so strong in their beliefs that they never let facts get in the way of them."

[Anonymous]

How many Dems switched parties after the civil rights act?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3LqPedoxSk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Did the real world teach you about the history of the early 1900's???

I would not expect an academic to fix a car. don't pretend that the average auto mechanic knows as much about history as a scholar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Did the real world teach you about the history of the early 1900's???

I would not expect an academic to fix a car. don't pretend that the average auto mechanic knows as much about history as a scholar.

And that's the problem - There are plenty of academics who are damn good at mechanics ... and plenty of mechanics who know a damn lot about history.

Stereotyping like that gets you into trouble!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Did the real world teach you about the history of the early 1900's???

I would not expect an academic to fix a car. don't pretend that the average auto mechanic knows as much about history as a scholar.

And that's the problem - There are plenty of academics who are damn good at mechanics ... and plenty of mechanics who know a damn lot about history.

Stereotyping like that gets you into trouble!

Fine, I suppose for you are sick, call your plumber. Because what the heck, he probably knows as much as your doctor about medicine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Did the real world teach you about the history of the early 1900's???

I would not expect an academic to fix a car. don't pretend that the average auto mechanic knows as much about history as a scholar.

And that's the problem - There are plenty of academics who are damn good at mechanics ... and plenty of mechanics who know a damn lot about history.

Stereotyping like that gets you into trouble!

PP:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You accuse me of being manipulated by someone with an agenda and your article comes from progressive sites? Really?

I didn't give you an "article". I gave you the historical documents written by W.E.B. DuBois to Woodrow Wilson, moron!

And that's one man's opinion

See, this is why liberals are asshats. They would rather take the word of one single man -- W.E.B. Dubois (isn't that French?) -- rather than a noted icon of American history such as Glenn Beck or his Peabody Award winning website, theblaze.

He's one man with one opinion, not a deity

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That's like saying Martin Luther King was just a Negro in the 50's and 60's. No, it's better than that. It's like the actual recorded words of the people there at the time of a historical event are not more or less valid as the musings of some random conservative poster 100 years later.

Please, keep it coming! This is too good to be true.

I know. I could not have made this up had I tried. LOL!!

Sorry but I'm still chuckling over this one. No wonder conservatives are scared of academia. They don't know what they are reading until someone tells them what it is and what to think about it.

What makes academics smarter than those with real world experience? Opinions are like assholes - everyone has one

Did the real world teach you about the history of the early 1900's???

I would not expect an academic to fix a car. don't pretend that the average auto mechanic knows as much about history as a scholar.

And that's the problem - There are plenty of academics who are damn good at mechanics ... and plenty of mechanics who know a damn lot about history.

Stereotyping like that gets you into trouble!

Fine, I suppose for you are sick, call your plumber. Because what the heck, he probably knows as much as your doctor about medicine.

A doctor isn't an academic in the same way a professor is an academic. Being a doctor is actually as technical and practical as a plumber.

[Anonymous]

Good then the plumber should have no trouble putting in your stent.

[Anonymous]

Now that the conservatives are done embarrassing themselves over the Dubois thing, we can get bannock o answer the OP:

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/23/20159691-da-teens-accused-in-ballplayers-slaying-wont-be-charged-with-hate-crimes?lite

DA says no evidence to say that race was the primary factor. An offensive tweet does not make a case.

The DA is a Republican in Oklahoma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good then the plumber should have no trouble putting in your stent.

At this point, I feel you are being deliberately obtuse. A doctor who is only book-educated with no actual patient experience is not capable of putting in a stent either. That's why there are rotations, residencies, etc in the program.