Princess Kate’s diet: GMA segment today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

I think he should have taken a sip, but the RD don't eat things they don't want to. They never eat shellfish - although Kate ate a raw oyster on a tour of Canada when William refused. And Kate refused to try the peanut paste on a tour showing the nutritional supplements that are used in places with famine. I think it's all weird and they should just take a small bite, but this isn't new.

He didn't even have to take a sip. Hold it up to his lips, pretend to swallow, and nobody would ever know the difference. Or just take the cup and hold it in his hand for 1/2 hour, like someone at a cocktail party who's handed a cocktail they don't want to drink. We all know how to do these things. It's just so weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

I think he should have taken a sip, but the RD don't eat things they don't want to. They never eat shellfish - although Kate ate a raw oyster on a tour of Canada when William refused. And Kate refused to try the peanut paste on a tour showing the nutritional supplements that are used in places with famine. I think it's all weird and they should just take a small bite, but this isn't new.

I'm sure not royal and I wouldn't eat or drink anything I didn't want to, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she doesn't eat anymore either

+1 she has to be restricting her food.

She's known to be a healthy eater and unusually active. Tennis, skiing, swimming, etc. If she's cleaned up her diet even further post-cancer, I'm not surprised she dropped weight.

Are you serious? She had no weight to drop. And she definitely thinned out a lot more when they got married. She wasn’t ever big to begin with!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

I think he should have taken a sip, but the RD don't eat things they don't want to. They never eat shellfish - although Kate ate a raw oyster on a tour of Canada when William refused. And Kate refused to try the peanut paste on a tour showing the nutritional supplements that are used in places with famine. I think it's all weird and they should just take a small bite, but this isn't new.

I'm sure not royal and I wouldn't eat or drink anything I didn't want to, either.

Nobody's asking him to drink it. They're saying he could have pretended. Say "thank you" and hold the cup for a few minutes. This isn't hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

Yes I am married. And no my dh would not pretend to drink something to make me happy. That would be weird. I mean I guess for the sake of the coffee stand he could have taken it to be polite but I don't see that as an issue between her and him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My mother never fully regained her sense of taste after chemo and surgery, so “years” after cancer she still looked like…a cancer patient. Kate has people to cover up the other effects on skin and hair but weight loss with cancer (even “preventative” chemo) isn’t really shocking.

She has been the same extremely small size for years before she had cancer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

Yes I am married. And no my dh would not pretend to drink something to make me happy. That would be weird. I mean I guess for the sake of the coffee stand he could have taken it to be polite but I don't see that as an issue between her and him.

And your husband wouldn't know that you take decaf or prefer tea, either? Poor you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

Charles is the monarch. Kate is not the monarch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just watched the coffee video. Wow that was overblown. From the commentary here I thought he had shamed her or was rude to her face. He just smiled and nicely said no. She seemed to be kidding with him. They were both laughing. Big whoop.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=898289193208143

Nope. He refuses to even pretend to drink the coffee she made. He even tells her to "make it better."

Are you married? Your spouse would put the cup to their lips, say "mmm!" take a fake sip, and nurse the cup for the rest of the event. He's supposed to be promoting this little coffee place. Are you telling us he's never had to deal with an unwanted beverage before? He's so bad at his job.

Yes I am married. And no my dh would not pretend to drink something to make me happy. That would be weird. I mean I guess for the sake of the coffee stand he could have taken it to be polite but I don't see that as an issue between her and him.

And your husband wouldn't know that you take decaf or prefer tea, either? Poor you.

I don’t know if this interaction proves anything about what she knows or doesn’t know. It was a little goofy thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

Charles is the monarch. Kate is not the monarch.

Neither is Camilla and yet she still manages to do more. Aren’t they supposed to be supporting the king like he did for his mom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

Charles is the monarch. Kate is not the monarch.

Huh? If anything, people would have more concern about the monarch's health than about hers. Yet the actual monarch, who is still undergoing cancer treatment two years on, worked 535 engagements last year compared to her 68 a year after her treatment ended. https://people.com/king-charles-hardest-working-royal-2025-despite-cancer-treatment-11875495

Please explain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

Charles is the monarch. Kate is not the monarch.

Huh? If anything, people would have more concern about the monarch's health than about hers. Yet the actual monarch, who is still undergoing cancer treatment two years on, worked 535 engagements last year compared to her 68 a year after her treatment ended. https://people.com/king-charles-hardest-working-royal-2025-despite-cancer-treatment-11875495

Please explain.

PS, please don't let the explanation involve "she's a mother" because all three of her kids are now in school full-time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not saying it's impossible, but Kate has since publicly visited the hospital where she had cancer treatment. If she's lying, a bunch of people surely know. I get that healthcare professionals are bound by privacy laws, but that's still a big risk. I think she's definitely been too skinny at times, but i honestly believe the cancer thing. Lying about cancer would take the RF down fast- much faster than Andrew. Which really says something about our society, btw.

I agree, a lie about cancer would be extremely risky, and it would take the Waleses down faster than anything Andrew ever did, and that's definitely a condemnation of our society. Which is why there may be some truth to it--a questionable pap smear, precancerous cells, or maybe even full-blown cancer. But the fact that she visited Marsden just the once and doesn't support cancer charities is also why people will forever be questioning why she told the Marsden chemo patients to get lots of sunlight, or told the Marsden patients that she had a port but nobody can see the port scar when she wears lowcut necklines or sleeveless dresses. People will be forever digging around the edges of this.

That's exactly why they shouldn't share details. If they said she had a certain type of cancer, then people would be digging up reasons why she is lying because she couldn't possibly have that. We already saw this when people said preventive chemo is impossible.

Charles said "I have cancer" from the start, and his office kept everyone updated on his treatment that went on for two years and is merely scaled back now. Nobody is digging around to find out what cancer he has, because they are convinced he's being straight about having cancer, end of.

The real problem, actually, is that she keeps making cancer her persona, so people like this chat keep digging into it. So many things about her are explained in terms of cancer--why she needed to move to a huge new mansion last fall, her working less than the 91-year-old Duke of Kent who lost his wife last year. Just simply stop making vague allusions to your "diagnosis" several years after the fact, like when she mentioned her vague "diagnosis" at a brewpub yesterday, sparking this very discussion. (If you don't want to drink, for understandable reasons, then don't go to a brewpub and basically call their beer poison. It really is that simple.) Because making cancer your persona inevitably invites people to reopen all the questions.

Charles is the monarch. Kate is not the monarch.

Huh? If anything, people would have more concern about the monarch's health than about hers. Yet the actual monarch, who is still undergoing cancer treatment two years on, worked 535 engagements last year compared to her 68 a year after her treatment ended. https://people.com/king-charles-hardest-working-royal-2025-despite-cancer-treatment-11875495

Please explain.

PS, please don't let the explanation involve "she's a mother" because all three of her kids are now in school full-time.

In school full time plus they have a nanny and household staff for cooking and cleaning.