It was a problem because it was for a year! For a week, there are great opportunities to do things that aren't easily done at school-- like enrichment activities for the kids who are on top of current work and more remedial work for kids who need it. Neither would particularly need teachers re-teaching (remedial stuff is all review and enrichment stuff can be done independently). So teachers could ready a range of such assignments at the beginning of the year and then when a snow day is predicted, they'd just need to assign which kid gets which set of work (videos, worksheets, projects, whatever). |
Are you actually a parent? This is wishful thinking. Good luck getting all the kids to do the worksheets or log on to Khan Academy. For present and engaged parents at the elementary, it will be an absolute power struggle as kids will fight tooth and nail about having to do any work on a snow day. At the high school level, only the motivated, disciplined and responsible kids who already care about their education will do any kind of synchronous or asynchronous work on a snow day. You all have to start dealing with the reality of kids and adolescents and not what you wish them to be. They are not small, fully developed adults. If they think they can take the easy way out of something they think is either boring or a waste of their time, they will. Everyone involved in education policy should know this and make plans accordingly. Plans like this are absolutely a nonstarter for a public school district. This can, however, work with small or selective private and charter schools. |
Kids need live teaching. It can be done well virtually. Try taking some of the harder classes with no teaching. We have a teacher doing a flipped classroom, what ever that means and the kids have to figure it out on their own via videos and its terrible. Virtual live teaching would be better. |
If its a struggle for you you need to readjust your parenting style. This is a you problem, not MCPS or us problem. |
And here's a microcosm of why kids are not performing well in school. "Kid's are going to be lazy, don't try to have expectations of them" is not a good excuse to not have virtual learning for extended closures. |
Seriously. I don't understand this screaming about virtual learning when so many schools offer virtual instruction. In NYS, my friend's school district has an automatic rule--two days of consecutive snow days, if conditions still aren't clear, then virtual learning kicks in. Four snow days are built into the calendar. There's no chaos about "what will be done" because things are automatic. Everything in MCPS seems to say that they must agonize over every decision because they're so different and special. We're not different and special. Other school districts have kids under Gr3, and kids with IEPs, and kids who are poor. They have approved virtual learning plans, because it's the best option rather than having no school at all. |
Really? Because some people are satisfied with virtual in some school districts, you think everyone should be happy with it everywhere? This is not just between "virtual days" and "no school". There are other options. Better options. But if you really want to push virtual, then come up with approaches to address or remediate the problems with it. Instead we just see people ignoring the problems because they're too hard or they think they would cost too much. |
I just don't understand how someone could write a message like this with a straight face. Really? I really wonder what sort of life you've had. You want to use virtual days for remedial lessons for elementary school kids? What are you expecting there. Kids from rich families with SAHPs or tutors are going to be fine. They won't even need that. The kids who do are going to be much more likely to be in households with parent support, or maybe simply be at daycare settings or grandparents homes without the means to connect and participate. Even if they do participate, what do you think expect the teacher to do? A lot of the lessons involve activities by hand or at least on paper. The student can't see what the teacher is doing, and even more importantly, the teacher can't see what the student is struggling with. You expect young kids to be able to break down a problem, think about what's at the root of their misunderstanding, and articulate a clear question? And then be able to process a verbal response? That's simply not a reasonable expectation for a second grader. Not even an on-grade-level second grader. Do you really think that would work? Or do you just not care? |
If it’s not a struggle for you to get your kids to do random Khan assignments, then why do you need the teacher to assign them? Why can’t you just tell them “Hey go do some random Khan assignments”? |
Busy work that can’t be graded. |
You are burying your head in the sand. MCPS is literally telling you virtual is a problem because large numbers of kids are absent or unengaged. As a public school system, they can’t ignore that fact because they HAVE to educate every child. So doing virtual learning, where they know only 50% or fewer of their students will show up for and of that 50%, only 50% will be engaged in the lesson is not worth it for them. Because it creates more makeup and catchup work for the teacher and the school. What are you not understanding? |
These posters touting this party line have no experience with children other than their privileged, well-resourced kids. |
I think you're not understanding that she doesn't care as long as her vacation isn't disrupted. |
Interesting how just four days ago, it was a crime that MCPS wasn’t offering it. Now we are back to the argument that it is actively harmful. |
There are one or two posters here who really don't want their summer vacations disrupted. Most everyone else knows that virtual is terrible for young kids, and only marginally useful for high school kids in AP classes. |